INTRODUCTION: The use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring (BAR) has been reported in the literature with good results. Our purpose in this review was to document the clinical outcomes after gastrointestinal anastomoses performed with use of the BAR. METHODS: Data were gathered systematically through chart review with the help of data collection forms from 159 patients who underwent 173 intestinal anastomoses performed with use of the BAR between 1992 and 1999. Of the 165 patients who had anastomoses (6 had 2 anastomoses constructed on separate occasions and were considered separately), 23 (13.9%) had surgery with anastomosis under emergency conditions, and 44 (26.7%) were steroid-dependent patients. The indications for surgery were malignant disease in 63 (38.2%) patients, inflammatory bowel disease in 54 (32.7%) patients, diverticular disease in 13 (7.9%) patients and other conditions in 35 (21.2%) patients. RESULTS: A clinical anastomotic leak developed in the first 2 weeks after surgery in 7 (4.2%) patients, 6 of whom required reoperation. All recovered well, withno deaths related to use of the BAR. Early small-bowel obstruction developed in 13 patients (7.9%), none of whom required reoperation. The average postoperative length of hospital stay was 9.0 days, the average time to pass the first flatus was 3.2 days, and the average time to begin oral fluid intake was 3.3 days. The rate of leakage at the anastomosis in our series was comparable to that found in randomized trials with the BAR (2.0%-4.4%) and as reported with hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses (1.9%-8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that use of the BAR is safe and effective in both elective and emergent surgery. The rate of leakage is comparable to that reported in the literature when a BAR is used.
INTRODUCTION: The use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring (BAR) has been reported in the literature with good results. Our purpose in this review was to document the clinical outcomes after gastrointestinal anastomoses performed with use of the BAR. METHODS: Data were gathered systematically through chart review with the help of data collection forms from 159 patients who underwent 173 intestinal anastomoses performed with use of the BAR between 1992 and 1999. Of the 165 patients who had anastomoses (6 had 2 anastomoses constructed on separate occasions and were considered separately), 23 (13.9%) had surgery with anastomosis under emergency conditions, and 44 (26.7%) were steroid-dependent patients. The indications for surgery were malignant disease in 63 (38.2%) patients, inflammatory bowel disease in 54 (32.7%) patients, diverticular disease in 13 (7.9%) patients and other conditions in 35 (21.2%) patients. RESULTS: A clinical anastomotic leak developed in the first 2 weeks after surgery in 7 (4.2%) patients, 6 of whom required reoperation. All recovered well, withno deaths related to use of the BAR. Early small-bowel obstruction developed in 13 patients (7.9%), none of whom required reoperation. The average postoperative length of hospital stay was 9.0 days, the average time to pass the first flatus was 3.2 days, and the average time to begin oral fluid intake was 3.3 days. The rate of leakage at the anastomosis in our series was comparable to that found in randomized trials with the BAR (2.0%-4.4%) and as reported with hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses (1.9%-8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that use of the BAR is safe and effective in both elective and emergent surgery. The rate of leakage is comparable to that reported in the literature when a BAR is used.
Authors: A Thiede; D Geiger; U A Dietz; E S Debus; R Engemann; G C Lexer; B Lünstedt; W Mokros Journal: World J Surg Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: A D Smith; M P Bubrick; S T Mestitz; F M Crouch; G R Johnston; D A Feeney; R L Strom; J W Maney Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1988-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: A A P Slesser; G Pellino; O Shariq; D Cocker; C Kontovounisios; S Rasheed; P P Tekkis Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Michael Thornton; Heman Joshi; Chandrakumar Vimalachandran; Richard Heath; Paul Carter; Ufuk Gur; Paul Rooney Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Dadi Vilhjalmsson; Stefan Appelros; Ervin Toth; Ingvar Syk; Anders Grönberg; Tommie Mynster; Henrik Thorlacius Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Adam Bobkiewicz; Adam Studniarek; Lukasz Krokowicz; Krzysztof Szmyt; Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki; Jacek Szmeja; Ryszard Marciniak; Michal Drews; Tomasz Banasiewicz Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 2.571