Literature DB >> 21547434

TMDL implementation in agricultural landscapes: a communicative and systemic approach.

Nicholas R Jordan1, Carissa Schively Slotterback, Kirsten Valentine Cadieux, David J Mulla, David G Pitt, Laura Schmitt Olabisi, Jin-Oh Kim.   

Abstract

Increasingly, total maximum daily load (TMDL) limits are being defined for agricultural watersheds. Reductions in non-point source pollution are often needed to meet TMDL limits, and improvements in management of annual crops appear insufficient to achieve the necessary reductions. Increased adoption of perennial crops and other changes in agricultural land use also appear necessary, but face major barriers. We outline a novel strategy that aims to create new economic opportunities for land-owners and other stakeholders and thereby to attract their voluntary participation in land-use change needed to meet TMDLs. Our strategy has two key elements. First, focused efforts are needed to create new economic enterprises that capitalize on the productive potential of multifunctional agriculture (MFA). MFA seeks to produce a wide range of goods and ecosystem services by well-designed deployment of annual and perennial crops across agricultural landscapes and watersheds; new revenue from MFA may substantially finance land-use change needed to meet TMDLs. Second, efforts to capitalize on MFA should use a novel methodology, the Communicative/Systemic Approach (C/SA). C/SA uses an integrative GIS-based spatial modeling framework for systematically assessing tradeoffs and synergies in design and evaluation of multifunctional agricultural landscapes, closely linked to deliberation and design processes by which multiple stakeholders can collaboratively create appropriate and acceptable MFA landscape designs. We anticipate that application of C/SA will strongly accelerate TMDL implementation, by aligning the interests of multiple stakeholders whose active support is needed to change agricultural land use and thereby meet TMDL goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21547434     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9647-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  16 in total

1.  Applying ecological risk principles to watershed assessment and management.

Authors:  Victor B Serveiss
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Per Olsson; Carl Folke; Fikret Berkes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Promoting transparency of long-term environmental decisions: the Hanford Decision Mapping System pilot project.

Authors:  Christina H Drew; Timothy L Nyerges; Thomas M Leschine
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  The impotence of cumulative effects assessment in Canada: ailments and ideas for redeployment.

Authors:  Peter N Duinker; Lorne A Greig
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Integrated water resources management: lost on the road from ambition to realisation?

Authors:  P Jeffrey; M Gearey
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.915

Review 6.  Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management.

Authors:  Heather Tallis; Stephen Polasky
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning.

Authors:  Fikret Berkes
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.789

8.  Energy. Beneficial biofuels--the food, energy, and environment trilemma.

Authors:  David Tilman; Robert Socolow; Jonathan A Foley; Jason Hill; Eric Larson; Lee Lynd; Stephen Pacala; John Reilly; Tim Searchinger; Chris Somerville; Robert Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: what do we really know?

Authors:  Pamela R D Williams; Daniel Inman; Andy Aden; Garvin A Heath
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development.

Authors:  David W Cash; William C Clark; Frank Alcock; Nancy M Dickson; Noelle Eckley; David H Guston; Jill Jäger; Ronald B Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 12.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.