Literature DB >> 11815819

Applying ecological risk principles to watershed assessment and management.

Victor B Serveiss1.   

Abstract

Considerable progress in addressing point source (end of pipe) pollution problems has been made, but it is now recognized that further substantial environmental improvements depend on controlling nonpoint source pollution. A watershed approach is being used more frequently to address these problems because traditional regulatory approaches do not focus on nonpoint sources. The watershed approach is organized around the guiding principles of partnerships, geographic focus, and management based on sound science and data. This helps to focus efforts on the highest priority problems within hydrologically-defined geographic areas. Ecological risk assessment is a process to collect, organize, analyze, and present scientific information to improve decision making. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sponsored three watershed assessments and found that integrating the watershed approach with ecological risk assessment increases the use of environmental monitoring and assessment data in decision making. This paper describes the basics of the watershed approach, the ecological risk assessment process, and how these two frameworks can be integrated. The three major principles of watershed ecological risk assessment found to be most useful for increasing the use of science in decision making are (1) using assessment endpoints and conceptual models, (2) holding regular interactions between scientists and managers, and (3) developing a focus for multiple stressor analysis. Examples are provided illustrating how these principles were implemented in these assessments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11815819     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-001-0025-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Applications of numerical sediment quality targets for assessing sediment quality conditions in a US Great Lakes Area of Concern.

Authors:  Judy L Crane; Donald D MacDonald
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Relation of environmental characteristics to fish assemblages in the upper French Broad River basin, North Carolina.

Authors:  Brenda Rashleigh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Ecological risk assessment and problem formulation for Lake Uluabat, a Ramsar State in Turkey.

Authors:  Guray Salihoglu; Feza Karaer
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Improving the TMDL process using watershed risk assessment principles.

Authors:  Victor B Serveiss; Jonathan B Butcher; Jerome Diamond; Ken C Jones
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  TMDL implementation in agricultural landscapes: a communicative and systemic approach.

Authors:  Nicholas R Jordan; Carissa Schively Slotterback; Kirsten Valentine Cadieux; David J Mulla; David G Pitt; Laura Schmitt Olabisi; Jin-Oh Kim
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of metals in sediments of Baiyangdian wetland ecosystem.

Authors:  Liya Su; Jingling Liu; Per Christensen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay Watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts.

Authors:  Victor B Serveiss; Jennifer L Bowen; David Dow; Ivan Valiela
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Using ecological indicators and a decision support system for integrated ecological assessment at two national park units in the mid-Atlantic region, USA.

Authors:  Carolyn G Mahan; John A Young; Bruce J Miller; Michael C Saunders
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  A phased approach for assessing combined effects from multiple stressors.

Authors:  Charles A Menzie; Margaret M MacDonell; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.