Literature DB >> 10512937

Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: international survey.

V Paolucci1, B Schaeff, M Schneider, C Gutt.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine if tumor seeding during laparoscopic surgery for cancer is a rare event or a typical complication of this procedure. Laparoscopic staging and treatment of intraabdominal tumors is increasing in gastroenterology, gynecology, and general surgery. A total of 1052 questionnaires were mailed to surgical department chairmen, members of the German Society of Surgery, Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery, and Austrian Society of Minimal Invasive Surgery asking them to list their department's experience with tumor seeding after laparoscopy for nonapparent or known malignancy. There were 607 (57.7%) surgeons who reported a total of 117,840 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 409 incidental gallbladder carcinomas, and 412 laparoscopies on patients with colorectal carcinoma. Altogether 109 patients who developed tumor recurrence in connection with laparoscopic surgery have been reported. Port-site recurrence was identified in 70 of 409 patients (17.1%) with a median of 180 days following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for nonapparent gallbladder carcinoma. In 8 cases (11.5%) a protective plastic bag had been used for gallbladder retrieval. Six patients without port-site metastases were found to have a diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis a median of 120 days after cholecystectomy. Of 412 laparoscopies for colorectal cancer, 19 cases (4.6%) of tumor seeding have been reported, 16 of which (3.9%) had documented port-site and scar recurrences a median of 196 days after laparoscopy. The tumor specimen was intact, and a plastic bag was used for extraction in seven cases. In 14 patients trocar-site metastases have been reported a median of 70 days after laparoscopy for different nonapparent or known malignancies. The probability of developing abdominal wall metastasis is higher after laparoscopy for cancer than after open surgery. An intact surgical specimen and the use of a plastic retrieval bag do not exclude the risk of port-site recurrences. These facts and the early appearance of peritoneal carcinosis in a few cases of intraabdominal malignancies seem to confirm a specific laparoscopic risk for intraperitoneal tumor cell seeding and implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10512937     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  59 in total

1.  Re: Paolucci, V et al: Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: international survey. World J. Surg. 23:989,1999.

Authors:  L Sarli; R Costi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Implications of the index cholecystectomy and timing of referral for radical resection of advanced incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  T Tsirlis; F Ausania; S A White; J J French; B C Jaques; R M Charnley; D M Manas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Minimally invasive versus the conventional open surgical approach of a radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Anil K Agarwal; Amit Javed; Raja Kalayarasan; Puja Sakhuja
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the database of the Swiss association of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Philippe Marc Glauser; Daniel Strub; Samuel Andreas Käser; Diana Mattiello; Franziska Rieben; Christoph Andreas Maurer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: morcellate or leave intact? Definitely morcellate!

Authors:  Jay T Bishoff
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 6.  Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule presenting as large bowel obstruction: a case report and brief review of the literature.

Authors:  Brant W Ullery; Heather Wachtel; Steven E Raper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Gallbladder carcinoma incidentally encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how to deal with it.

Authors:  Ketao Jin; Huanrong Lan; Tieming Zhu; Kuifeng He; Lisong Teng
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for appendix carcinoid.

Authors:  P Bucher; P Gervaz; F Ris; W Oulhaci; I Inan; P Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and management of the distal ureter: a review of current techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Davis P Viprakasit; Amanda M Macejko; Robert B Nadler
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-01-08

10.  Guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas: surgical treatment.

Authors:  Satoshi Kondo; Tadahiro Takada; Masaru Miyazaki; Shuichi Miyakawa; Kazuhiro Tsukada; Masato Nagino; Junji Furuse; Hiroya Saito; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Masakazu Yamamoto; Masato Kayahara; Fumio Kimura; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Satoshi Nozawa; Masahiro Yoshida; Keita Wada; Satoshi Hirano; Hodaka Amano; Fumihiko Miura
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.