Literature DB >> 21547377

Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography.

Rui Wang1, Wei Yu, Yongmei Wang, Yi He, Lin Yang, Tao Bi, Jian Jiao, Qian Wang, Liquan Chi, Yang Yu, Zhaoqi Zhang.   

Abstract

To determine the value of dual-energy CT (DECT) and combined information of perfusion and angiography in diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD), with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as a reference standard. Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this study. DECT was used as a contrast-enhanced retrospectively ECG-gated scan protocol during the rest state and tubes were set at 140/100 kV. DECT angiography (DE-CTA) and DECT perfusion (DE-CTP) were calculated from two kV images. DE-CTP results were compared with SPECT and DE-CTA with QCA, respectively. The combined DE-CTP with DE-CTA data were compared to QCA in diagnosis of obstructive CAD (stenosis ≥ 50%). DECT showed diagnostic image quality in 31 patients. Using SPECT as a reference, DE-CTP had sensitivity of 68%, specificity of 93%, and sensitivity of 81%, and specificity of 92% for identifying any type of perfusion deficits on the segment- and territory-based analysis, respectively. Using QCA as a reference standard, DE-CTA showed sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 91% and accuracy of 86% for detecting ≥50% coronary stenosis on the vessel-based analysis, whereas the combination of DE-CTA and DE-CTP gave sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 86% and accuracy of 88% for detecting ≥50% coronary stenosis, respectively. Combination of DE-CTP and DE-CTA may improve diagnostic performance compared to CTA alone for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21547377     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9881-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  34 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart.

Authors:  Richard L Morin; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Piet K Vanhoenacker; Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Ruben Van Heste; Isabel Decramer; Lieven R Van Hoe; William Wijns; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dual source dual-energy computed tomography of acute myocardial infarction: correlation with histopathologic findings in a canine model.

Authors:  Long-Jiang Zhang; Jin Peng; Sheng-Yong Wu; Benjamin M Yeh; Chang-Sheng Zhou; Guang-Ming Lu
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  Cardiac MRI in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Masaki Ishida; Shingo Kato; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.993

7.  Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply.

Authors:  Balazs Ruzsics; Florian Schwarz; U Joseph Schoepf; Yeong Shyan Lee; Gorka Bastarrika; Salvatore A Chiaramida; Philip Costello; Peter L Zwerner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Perfusion weighted color maps for enhanced visualization of myocardial infarction by MSCT: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Andreas Horst Mahnken; Stefan Lautenschläger; Dominik Fritz; Ralf Koos; Michael Scheuering
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Combined assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nadjia Kachenoura; Tamar Gaspar; Joseph A Lodato; Dianna M E Bardo; Barbara Newby; Sarah Gips; Nathan Peled; Roberto M Lang; Victor Mor-Avi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Functional assessment of coronary artery flow using adenosine stress dual-energy CT: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Michinobu Nagao; Teruhito Kido; Kouki Watanabe; Hideyuki Saeki; Hideki Okayama; Akira Kurata; Kohei Hosokawa; Hiroshi Higashino; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial CT perfusion imaging for ischemia detection.

Authors:  Patricia Carrascosa; Carlos Capunay
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

Review 2.  New Applications of Cardiac Computed Tomography: Dual-Energy, Spectral, and Molecular CT Imaging.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Zahi A Fayad; Martin J Willemink; James K Min
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis.

Authors:  A M Bucher; C N De Cecco; U J Schoepf; R Wang; F G Meinel; S R Binukrishnan; J V Spearman; T J Vogl; B Ruzsics
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Cardiac CT Imaging of Plaque Vulnerability: Hype or Hope?

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Tim Leiner; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Myocardial ischemia testing with computed tomography: emerging strategies.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Christopher D Maroules
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10

Review 6.  Computed tomography of cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Kevin Kalisz; Prabhakar Rajiah
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10

Review 7.  Delayed enhancement cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of myocardial infarction: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

Review 8.  The New Frontier of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography: Fractional Flow Reserve and Stress Myocardial Perfusion.

Authors:  Gianluca Pontone; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Daniele Andreini; Andrea I Guaricci; Marco Guglielmo; Saima Mushtaq; Andrea Baggiano; Edoardo Conte; Virginia Beltrama; Andrea Annoni; Alberto Formenti; Elisabetta Mancini; Mark G Rabbat; Mauro Pepi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-12

9.  Accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for the measurement of iodine concentration using cardiac CT protocols: validation in a phantom model.

Authors:  James D Koonce; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; U Joseph Schoepf; Bernhard Schmidt; Amy E Wahlquist; Paul J Nietert; Gorka Bastarrika; Thomas G Flohr; Felix G Meinel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Clinical Impact of Rest Dual-energy Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Stefan Baumann; Marlon Rutsch; Tobias Becher; Philipp Kryeziu; Holger Haubenreisser; Nils Vogler; Celi Anne Schoenike; Martin Borggrefe; Stefan O Schoenberg; Ibrahim Akin; Thomas Henzler; Dirk Lossnitzer
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.