PURPOSE: The reliable detection of myocardial perfusion defects and myocardial infarction (MI) is of great interest in the comprehensive workup of coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to optimize the ability of contrast-enhanced cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for detecting hypoperfused myocardium as surrogate marker of MI using a newly developed post-processing technique. METHODS: First a model-based software tool for semi-automated detection of the long axis of the left ventricle and assignment of left-ventricular segments was developed using a region growing algorithm and a point distribution model. To visualize changes of the myocardial contrast enhancement pattern color coding was performed after spreading of the attenuation values. 15 patients (12 men, mean age 57 +/- 15 years) with a history of MI underwent cardiac MSCT (16 x 0.75 mm, 120 kV, 550 mA s(eff.), 100 ml Iopromide) and contrast enhanced delayed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) after administration of 0.2 mmol Gd-DTPA/kg/bodyweight as reference standard. Presence of infarction was assessed from MSCT, post-processed MSCT images and DE-MRI using a 17-segment model of the left ventricle. RESULTS: On DE-MRI MI was present in 78/255 myocardial segments. From conventional MSCT images MI was detected in 63/255 segments (5 false positive; sensitivity 74.4%; specificity: 97.1%), while on post-processed images MI was assigned to 74/255 segments (6 false positive; sensitivity 87.2%; specificity: 96.6%). Agreement between DE-MRI and conventional MSCT images for detecting MI was kappa = 0.756. Using post-processed images agreement improved to kappa = 0.850. CONCLUSION: MSCT detection of hypoperfused myocardium as surrogate for MI can be improved using dedicated post processing algorithms.
PURPOSE: The reliable detection of myocardial perfusion defects and myocardial infarction (MI) is of great interest in the comprehensive workup of coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to optimize the ability of contrast-enhanced cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for detecting hypoperfused myocardium as surrogate marker of MI using a newly developed post-processing technique. METHODS: First a model-based software tool for semi-automated detection of the long axis of the left ventricle and assignment of left-ventricular segments was developed using a region growing algorithm and a point distribution model. To visualize changes of the myocardial contrast enhancement pattern color coding was performed after spreading of the attenuation values. 15 patients (12 men, mean age 57 +/- 15 years) with a history of MI underwent cardiac MSCT (16 x 0.75 mm, 120 kV, 550 mA s(eff.), 100 ml Iopromide) and contrast enhanced delayed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) after administration of 0.2 mmol Gd-DTPA/kg/bodyweight as reference standard. Presence of infarction was assessed from MSCT, post-processed MSCT images and DE-MRI using a 17-segment model of the left ventricle. RESULTS: On DE-MRI MI was present in 78/255 myocardial segments. From conventional MSCT images MI was detected in 63/255 segments (5 false positive; sensitivity 74.4%; specificity: 97.1%), while on post-processed images MI was assigned to 74/255 segments (6 false positive; sensitivity 87.2%; specificity: 96.6%). Agreement between DE-MRI and conventional MSCT images for detecting MI was kappa = 0.756. Using post-processed images agreement improved to kappa = 0.850. CONCLUSION: MSCT detection of hypoperfused myocardium as surrogate for MI can be improved using dedicated post processing algorithms.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kai Uwe Juergens; Matthias Grude; David Maintz; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Wichter; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-12-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Konstantin Nikolaou; Javier Sanz; Michael Poon; Bernd J Wintersperger; Bernd Ohnesorge; Teresa Rius; Zahi A Fayad; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-03-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S M Ko; J B Seo; M K Hong; K H Do; S H Lee; J S Lee; J W Song; S J Park; S W Park; T H Lim Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Andreas H Mahnken; Ralf Koos; Marcus Katoh; Joachim E Wildberger; Elmar Spuentrup; Arno Buecker; Rolf W Günther; Harald P Kühl Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-06-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Thomas A Holly; Michael D Elliott; Matthias Regenfus; Michele Parker; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-02-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A M Bucher; C N De Cecco; U J Schoepf; R Wang; F G Meinel; S R Binukrishnan; J V Spearman; T J Vogl; B Ruzsics Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Serena Dell'Aversana; Raffaele Ascione; Marco De Giorgi; Davide Raffaele De Lucia; Renato Cuocolo; Marco Boccalatte; Gerolamo Sibilio; Giovanni Napolitano; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Sandro Sironi; Giuseppe Di Costanzo; Enrico Cavaglià; Massimo Imbriaco; Andrea Ponsiglione Journal: J Imaging Date: 2022-09-01