| Literature DB >> 21547064 |
Tongming Liu1, Ling Liu, Qiwei Wei, Yunhan Hong.
Abstract
Sperm nuclear transfer or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a powerful assisted reproductive technology (ART) for treating human male infertility. Controversial reports of increased birth defects have raised concerns about the ART's safety. The cause for birth defects, however, has remained elusive for analysis in human because of the sample size, male infertility genetics, physiological heterogeneity and associated procedures such as embryo manipulations. Animal models are required to evaluate factors leading to the increased birth defects. Here we report the establishment of medakafish model for ICSI and transgenic production. This small laboratory fish has high fecundity and easy embryology. We show that ICSI produced a 5% high percentage of fertile animals that exhibited both paternal and maternal contribution as evidenced by the pigmentation marker. Furthermore, when sperm were pre-incubated with a plasmid ubiquitously expressing RFP and subjected to ICSI, 50% of sperm nuclear transplants showed germline transmission. We conclude that medaka is an excellent model for ICSI to evaluate birth defects and that sperm nuclear transfer can mediate stable gene transfer at high efficiency. Although more demanding for experimentation, sperm-mediated transgenesis should be particularly applicable for aquaculture species with a lengthy generation time and/or a large adult body size.Entities:
Keywords: gene transfer; medaka; nuclear transfer; sperm; transgenesis
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21547064 PMCID: PMC3088289 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.7.469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Figure 1Sperm nuclei and ICSI. (a-b) Sperm after demembranation and propidium iodide staining (red) were detected under phase-contrast (a) and fluorescent optics (b). A sperm nucleus is 4 μm. (c) Mature oocyte showing micropyle and the cytoplasmic region (circle) free of attachment filaments (af). (d) The same oocyte shown in (c) after sperm nuclear transfer, showing the injection capillary and oil droplets (od) that are fused (arrow) and fusing (asterisks). The oocyte is 1 mm in diameter.
Sperm nuclear transplantation
| Method of injection | Number of experiments | Eggs injected | Gastrula, n (%)1) | Fry, n (%)1) | Adult, n (%)1) | Germline transmission n (%)2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICSI | 4 | 223 | 19 (8.5) | 13 (5.8) | 11 (4.9) | Nd |
| ICSI + linear pDsRed-N1 | 3 | 112 | 8 (7.1) | 7 (6.3) | 6 (5.5) | 3 (50) |
1) Derived by comparison to the total number of eggs injected.
2) Derived by comparison to the number of adults.
Figure 2Production of transgenic sperm nuclear transplant. (a) Flow chat of the procedure. Sperm nuclei after demembration treatments are incubated with pDsRed1 DNA and individually injected into normal mature eggs, resulting in the restoration of diploidy in the eggs that develop into sperm nuclear transplants containing sperm-mediated transgene pDsRed1. Notably, the combination of nuclei between two albino strains produces wildtype pigmentation, most evident in the eye. (b-e') A representative sperm nuclear transplant at different stages of development, showing RFP expression and wildtype pigmentation. (f and f') Transgenic F1 progeny from a cross between the sperm nuclear transplant male (shown in Table 1) and albino strains i1, showing pigmentation and ubiquitous RFP expression.
Germline transmission in F1 progeny1)
| SNT (sex) | Total of Progeny | RPF-positive progeny, n (%) | RPF-negative progeny, n (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subtotal2) | Albino3) | Pigmented3) | Subtotal2) | Albino3) | Pigmented3) | ||
| 1 (♀) | 53 | 9 (17) | 4 | 5 | 44 | 21 | 23 |
| 2 (♀) | 64 | 13 (22) | 5 | 8 | 51 | 23 | 28 |
| 3 (♀) | 73 | 41 (56) | 23 | 18 | 32 | 19 | 13 |
| 4 (♂) | 200 | 174 (87) | 91 | 87 | 22 | 11 | 11 |
| Sum | 390 | 237 (61) | 123 (52) | 118 (48) | 149 (39) | 74 (50) | 75 (50) |
1) SNTs were crossed to the opposite sex of non-transgenic i medaka. RFP expression was monitored throughout embryonic development. Pigmentation was monitored from day 3 post fertilization onwards.
2) Derived by comparison to the total number of progeny observed.
3) Derived by comparison to the subtotal of progeny.