Literature DB >> 16730739

Inverse analysis of constitutive models: biological soft tissues.

Fulin Lei1, A Z Szeri.   

Abstract

The paper describes a procedure for estimating the material parameters of biological soft tissue by fitting model prediction to experimental load-deformation data. This procedure minimizes the error between data and theoretical model prediction through systematically adjusting the parameters in the latter. The procedure uses commercially available software and is not specific to any particular model; nevertheless, for illustration purposes, we employ a six parameter fibril-reinforced poroelastic cartilage model. We are able to estimate any and all of these parameters by the procedure. Convergence of the parameters and convergence of the arbitrary initial stress relaxation to the data was demonstrated in all cases. Though we illustrate the optimization procedure here for unconfined compression only, it can be adapted easily to other experimental configurations such as confined compression, indentation and tensile test. Furthermore, the procedure can be applied in other areas of biomechanics where material parameters need to be extracted from experimental data.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16730739     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  15 in total

1.  A nonlinear biphasic fiber-reinforced porohyperviscoelastic model of articular cartilage incorporating fiber reorientation and dispersion.

Authors:  A Seifzadeh; J Wang; D C D Oguamanam; M Papini
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Biphasic Finite Element Modeling Reconciles Mechanical Properties of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Constructs Across Testing Platforms.

Authors:  Gregory R Meloni; Matthew B Fisher; Brendan D Stoeckl; George R Dodge; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Repeated measurement of mechanical properties in viable osteochondral explants following a single blunt impact injury.

Authors:  P S Ramakrishnan; D R Pedersen; N J Stroud; D J McCabe; J A Martin
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.617

4.  Using regression models to determine the poroelastic properties of cartilage.

Authors:  Chen-Yuan Chung; Joseph M Mansour
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Adaptive surrogate modeling for expedited estimation of nonlinear tissue properties through inverse finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jason P Halloran; Ahmet Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Use of a Poroelastic Model to Predict Intramuscular Pressure.

Authors:  D A Morrow; G M Odegard; K R Kaufman
Journal:  Poromechanics V (2013)       Date:  2013-07-10

7.  Experimental determination of the permeability in the lacunar-canalicular porosity of bone.

Authors:  Gaffar Gailani; Mohammed Benalla; Rashal Mahamud; Stephen C Cowin; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Transport of neutral solute in articular cartilage: effect of microstructure anisotropy.

Authors:  Le Zhang; Andras Z Szeri
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Skeletal muscle tensile strain dependence: Hyperviscoelastic nonlinearity.

Authors:  Benjamin B Wheatley; Duane A Morrow; Gregory M Odegard; Kenton R Kaufman; Tammy L Haut Donahue
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-09-08

10.  New resource for the computation of cartilage biphasic material properties with the interpolant response surface method.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Lampros C Kourtis; Thor F Besier; Derek P Lindsey; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp; Gary S Beaupre
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.