Literature DB >> 21540013

Interfraction prostate rotation determined from in-room computerized tomography images.

Rebecca Owen1, Tomas Kron, Farshad Foroudi, Alvin Milner, Jennifer Cox, Gillian Duchesne.   

Abstract

Fiducial markers (FMs) are commonly used as a correction technique for interfraction translations of the prostate. The aim of this investigation was to determine the magnitude of prostate rotations using 2 methods: FM coordinates and the anatomical border of the prostate and rectum. Daily computed tomography (CT) scans (n = 346) of 10 prostate cancer patients with 3 implanted FMs were acquired using the CT on rails. FM coordinates were used to determine rotation in the sagittal, transverse, and coronal planes, and CT contours of the prostate and rectum were used to determine rotation along the sagittal plane. An adaptive technique based on a subset of images (n = 6; planning and first 5 treatment CTs) to reduce systematic rotation errors in the sagittal plane was tested. The standard deviation (SD) of systematic rotation from FM coordinates was 7.6°, 7.7°, and 5.0° in the sagittal, transverse and coronal planes. The corresponding SD of random error was 10.2°, 15.8°, and 6.5°. Errors in the sagittal plane, determined from prostate and rectal contours, were 10.1° (systematic) and 7.7° (random). These results did not correlate with rotation computed from FM coordinates (r = -0.017; p = 0.753, n = 337). The systematic error could be reduced by 43% to 5.6° when the mean prostate position was estimated from 6 CT scans. Prostate rotation is a significant source of error that appears to be more accurately determined using the anatomical border of the prostate and rectum rather than FMs, thus highlighting the utility of CT image guidance.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21540013     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Amy S Harrison; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Timothy N Showalter; Mark D Hurwitz; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Impact of pitch angle setup error and setup error correction on dose distribution in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Akihiro Takemura; Kumiko Togawa; Tomohiro Yokoi; Shinichi Ueda; Kimiya Noto; Hironori Kojima; Naoki Isomura; Tomoyasu Kumano
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-02-12

3.  Dosimetric Impact of the Positional Imaging Frequency for Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy - A Voxel-by-Voxel Analysis.

Authors:  Mona Splinter; Ilias Sachpazidis; Tilman Bostel; Tobias Fechter; Constantinos Zamboglou; Christian Thieke; Oliver Jäkel; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus; Dimos Baltas; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Prostate rotation detected from implanted markers can affect dose coverage and cannot be simply dismissed.

Authors:  Qingyang Shang; Lawrence J Sheplan Olsen; Kevin Stephans; Rahul Tendulkar; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Geographical miss of the prostate during image-guided radiotherapy with a 6-mm posterior expansion margin.

Authors:  Richard Oates; Daryl Jones; Farshad Foroudi; Suki Gill; Prabhakar Ramachandran; Michal Schneider; Michael Lim Joon; Tomas Kron
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2016-11-08

6.  Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy-Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation.

Authors:  Tilman Bostel; Ilias Sachpazidis; Mona Splinter; Nina Bougatf; Tobias Fechter; Constantinos Zamboglou; Oliver Jäkel; Peter E Huber; Dimos Baltas; Jürgen Debus; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Consensus statements on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology.

Authors:  Wai-Kit Ma; Darren Ming-Chun Poon; Chi-Kwok Chan; Tim-Wai Chan; Foon-Yiu Cheung; Lap-Yin Ho; Eric Ka-Chai Lee; Angus Kwong-Chuen Leung; Simon Yiu-Lam Leung; Hing-Shing So; Po-Chor Tam; Philip Wai-Kay Kwong
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Stability of daily rectal movement and effectiveness of replanning protocols for sparing rectal doses based on the daily CT images during proton treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Maeda; Yoshitaka Sato; Kazutaka Yamamoto; Hiroyasu Tamamura; Makoto Sasaki; Nobukazu Fuwa; Shigeyuki Takamatsu; Kyo Kume
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Volumetric-based image guidance is superior to marker-based alignments for stereotactic body radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wen Li; Lan Lu; Kevin L Stephans; Naveen Sharma; Andrew Vassil; Zhilei Liu Shen; Abigail Stockham; Toufik Djemil; Rahul D Tendulkar; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations for Post-prostatectomy Radiotherapy to the Prostatic Fossa-Relevance for the Frequency of Position Verification Imaging and Treatment Adaptation.

Authors:  Mona Splinter; Tilman Bostel; Ilias Sachpazidis; Tobias Fechter; Constantinos Zamboglou; Oliver Jäkel; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus; Dimos Baltas; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.