Literature DB >> 26873139

Impact of pitch angle setup error and setup error correction on dose distribution in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Akihiro Takemura1, Kumiko Togawa2, Tomohiro Yokoi3, Shinichi Ueda4, Kimiya Noto4, Hironori Kojima4, Naoki Isomura4, Tomoyasu Kumano5.   

Abstract

In volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer, a positional and rotational error correction is performed according to the position and angle of the prostate. The correction often involves body leaning, and there is concern regarding variation in the dose distribution. Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the impact of body pitch rotation on the dose distribution regarding VMAT. Treatment plans were obtained retrospectively from eight patients with prostate cancer. The body in the computed tomography images for the original VMAT plan was shifted to create VMAT plans with virtual pitch angle errors of ±1.5° and ±3°. Dose distributions for the tilted plans were recalculated with use of the same beam arrangement as that used for the original VMAT plan. The mean value of the maximum dose differences in the dose distributions between the original VMAT plan and the tilted plans was 2.98 ± 0.96 %. The value of the homogeneity index for the planning target volume (PTV) had an increasing trend according to the pitch angle error, and the values of the D 95 for the PTV and D 2ml, V 50, V 60, and V 70 for the rectum had decreasing trends (p < 0.05). However, there was no correlation between differences in these indexes and the maximum dose difference. The pitch angle error caused by body leaning had little effect on the dose distribution; in contrast, the pitch angle correction reduced the effects of organ displacement and improved these indexes. Thus, the pitch angle setup error in VMAT for prostate cancer should be corrected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose distribution; Pitch angle; Prostate cancer; Setup error; Volumetric modulated arc therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26873139     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-016-0347-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  16 in total

Review 1.  A review of prostate motion with considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Byrne
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.482

2.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging.

Authors:  John M Schallenkamp; Michael G Herman; Jon J Kruse; Thomas M Pisansky
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  A comparison of the use of bony anatomy and internal markers for offline verification and an evaluation of the potential benefit of online and offline verification protocols for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Helen A McNair; Vibeke N Hansen; Christopher C Parker; Phil M Evans; Andrew Norman; Elizabeth Miles; Emma J Harris; Louise Del-Acroix; Elizabeth Smith; Richard Keane; Vincent S Khoo; Alan C Thompson; David P Dearnaley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Validation of deformable image registration algorithms on CT images of ex vivo porcine bladders with fiducial markers.

Authors:  S Wognum; S E Heethuis; T Rosario; M S Hoogeman; A Bel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI).

Authors:  Michel J Ghilezan; David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Marcel Van Herk; Anil Shetty; Michael B Sharpe; Syed Zafar Jafri; Frank A Vicini; Richard C Matter; Donald S Brabbins; Alvaro A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Rectal dose-volume constraints in high-dose radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Claudio Fiorino; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Cesare Cozzarini; Gianni Fellin; Franca Foppiano; Loris Menegotti; Anna Piazzolla; Vittorio Vavassori; Riccardo Valdagni
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.

Authors:  Weihua Fu; Yong Yang; Ning J Yue; Dwight E Heron; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.482

8.  Trends in radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in elderly patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Carrie Luu; Leanne Goldstein; Bryan Goldner; Hans F Schoellhammer; Steven L Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Rotation effects on the target-volume margin determination.

Authors:  Qinghui Zhang; Weijun Xiong; Maria F Chan; Yulin Song; Chandra Burman
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.119

10.  Potentials of on-line repositioning based on implanted fiducial markers and electronic portal imaging in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Reinhold Graf; Peter Wust; Volker Budach; Dirk Boehmer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Tomoya Kaneda; Toshio Ohashi; Takashi Hanada; Koji Takenaka; Shuichi Nishimura; Masanori Sakayori; Shinya Sutani; Tetsuo Momma; Naoyuki Shigematsu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.724

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.