Literature DB >> 21539772

How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization?

Stefano Piana1, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, David E Shaw.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations hold the promise of providing an atomic-level description of protein folding that cannot easily be obtained from experiments. Here, we examine the extent to which the molecular mechanics force field used in such simulations might influence the observed folding pathways. To that end, we performed equilibrium simulations of a fast-folding variant of the villin headpiece using four different force fields. In each simulation, we observed a large number of transitions between the unfolded and folded states, and in all four cases, both the rate of folding and the structure of the native state were in good agreement with experiments. We found, however, that the folding mechanism and the properties of the unfolded state depend substantially on the choice of force field. We thus conclude that although it is important to match a single, experimentally determined structure and folding rate, this does not ensure that a given simulation will provide a unique and correct description of the full free-energy surface and the mechanism of folding.
Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21539772      PMCID: PMC3149239          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  22 in total

1.  Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher D Snow; Houbi Nguyen; Vijay S Pande; Martin Gruebele
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Unifying features in protein-folding mechanisms.

Authors:  Stefano Gianni; Nicholas R Guydosh; Faaizah Khan; Teresa D Caldas; Ugo Mayor; George W N White; Mari L DeMarco; Valerie Daggett; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Sub-microsecond protein folding.

Authors:  Jan Kubelka; Thang K Chiu; David R Davies; William A Eaton; James Hofrichter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

6.  Heterogeneity even at the speed limit of folding: large-scale molecular dynamics study of a fast-folding variant of the villin headpiece.

Authors:  Daniel L Ensign; Peter M Kasson; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Chemical, physical, and theoretical kinetics of an ultrafast folding protein.

Authors:  Jan Kubelka; Eric R Henry; Troy Cellmer; James Hofrichter; William A Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function.

Authors:  John L Klepeis; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Common structural transitions in explicit-solvent simulations of villin headpiece folding.

Authors:  Peter L Freddolino; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06
View more
  243 in total

1.  Toward Learned Chemical Perception of Force Field Typing Rules.

Authors:  Camila Zanette; Caitlin C Bannan; Christopher I Bayly; Josh Fass; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Effects of pH on proteins: predictions for ensemble and single-molecule pulling experiments.

Authors:  Edward P O'Brien; Bernard R Brooks; D Thirumalai
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Protein folding is mechanistically robust.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Weber; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Residue-specific α-helix propensities from molecular simulation.

Authors:  Robert B Best; David de Sancho; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Simple few-state models reveal hidden complexity in protein folding.

Authors:  Kyle A Beauchamp; Robert McGibbon; Yu-Shan Lin; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Low folding cooperativity of HP35 revealed by single-molecule force spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Chunmei Lv; Cheng Tan; Meng Qin; Dawei Zou; Yi Cao; Wei Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  In silico structural characterization of protein targets for drug development against Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Carlyle Ribeiro Lima; Nicolas Carels; Ana Carolina Ramos Guimaraes; Pierre Tufféry; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Linking time-series of single-molecule experiments with molecular dynamics simulations by machine learning.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Matsunaga; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Molecular mechanism of GPCR-mediated arrestin activation.

Authors:  Naomi R Latorraca; Jason K Wang; Brian Bauer; Raphael J L Townshend; Scott A Hollingsworth; Julia E Olivieri; H Eric Xu; Martha E Sommer; Ron O Dror
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Probing the Huntingtin 1-17 membrane anchor on a phospholipid bilayer by using all-atom simulations.

Authors:  Sébastien Côté; Vincent Binette; Evgeniy S Salnikov; Burkhard Bechinger; Normand Mousseau
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.