Literature DB >> 18947638

The minimally invasive open pyeloplasty.

Job K Chacko1, Martin A Koyle, Gerald C Mingin, Peter D Furness.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The dismembered pyeloplasty is the operation of choice for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Recently, with the advent of improved minimally invasive techniques and equipment, laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty has gained popularity. We present our experience with a minimally invasive open pyeloplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the last 5 years of consecutive open pyeloplasties was performed with regard to age, surgical operative time, length of hospital stay, need for postoperative narcotics and surgical success.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients had a dismembered pyeloplasty using an open flank incision: 34 patients (<1 year), 13 (1-5 years), 7 (5-10 years) and 20 (>10 years). Mean surgical time for patients according to age was: <1 year, 109.4+/-36.4 min; 1-5 years, 105.5+/-37.4 min; 5-10 years, 131.1+/-76.4 min; >10 years, 134+/-37.8 min. Mean incision sizes for the respective groups were 2.01+/-0.50 cm, 1.93+/-0.73 cm, 2.71+/-1.55 cm and 3.5+/-1.58 cm. The last 20 patients under 1 year of age had incisions of 1-1.5 cm. The majority of incisions were via a posterior subcostal muscle splitting approach. All patients received postoperative ketorolac and acetaminophen. Supplemental narcotics were not required in any patient less than 10 years old. All patients were discharged in <23 h. Radiologic and/or symptomatic improvement was seen in 70/74 (95%) patients after surgery.
CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive approach to open pyeloplasty is a safe and effective treatment choice for UPJO. In small children our technique can be easily performed through a small incision without excessive postoperative pain allowing for early discharge. Our results with a refined open surgical technique challenge the current trend in the literature that laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques are superior with regard to cosmesis, length of stay and postoperative narcotic use.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18947638     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  6 in total

1.  Reverse Tubularized Pelvis Flap Method for the Treatment of Long Segment Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Haluk Sarihan; Hatice Sonay Yalçın Comert; Mustafa İmamoğlu; Dilek Basar
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Study comparing the applicability of dorsal lumbotomy in older children.

Authors:  Jonathan Cloutier; Nadim Haidar; Marie-Pier Rompre-Deschenes; Maryse Grimard; Stéphane Bolduc
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Experience with laparoscopy-assisted retroperitoneal pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Mohan K Abraham; Abdul Rasheed A Nasir; S Bindu; P Ramakrishnan; Prashant M Kedari; Gopidas R Unnithan; Kalyan Ravi Prasad Damisetti
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome.

Authors:  Vishwajeet Singh; Manish Garg; Pradeep Sharma; Rahul Janak Sinha; Manoj Kumar
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Comparative, Prospective, Case-Control Study of Open versus Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Long-term Results.

Authors:  Lisandro A Piaggio; Juan P Corbetta; Santiago Weller; Ricardo Augusto Dingevan; Víctor Duran; Javier Ruiz; Juan C Lopez
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: experience of 226 cases at one centre.

Authors:  Marcin Polok; Dominika Borselle; Krystian Toczewski; Wojciech Apoznański; Diana Jędrzejuk; Dariusz Patkowski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.