| Literature DB >> 21539741 |
Jérôme Fuchs1, Jon Fjeldså, Rauri C K Bowie.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Eastern Arc Mountains of Africa have become one of the focal systems with which to explore the patterns and mechanisms of diversification among montane species and populations. One unresolved question is the extent to which populations inhabiting montane forest interact with those of adjacent lowland forest abutting the coast of eastern Africa. The Tiny Greenbul (Phyllastephus debilis) represents the only described bird species within the Eastern Arc/coastal forest mosaic, which is polytypic across an altitudinal gradient: the subspecies albigula (green head) is distributed in the montane Usambara and Nguru Mountains whereas the subspecies rabai (grey head) is found in Tanzanian lowland and foothill forest. Using a combination of morphological and genetic data, we aim to establish if the pattern of morphological differentiation in the Tiny Greenbul (Phyllastrephus debilis) is the result of disruptive selection along an altitudinal gradient or a consequence of secondary contact following population expansion of two differentiated lineages.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21539741 PMCID: PMC3097164 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Distribution of . The painting depicts the typical plumage of P. d. albigula and P. d. rabai/debilis, respectively.
Figure 250% majority consensus rule tree obtained from the Bayesian analyses of ND2. Values close to nodes represent bootstrap values (above node; if > 75%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (below node; if >0.95). Mean genetic distances among the primary groups are indicated. The haplotype networks were constructed using the statistical parsimony algorithm implemented in TCS.
Genetic diversity estimated using DNASP for each locus: Hd, haplotype diversity; S, number of segregating sites and π, nucleotide diversity.
| Locus | Nbp/Nvar | Population | Nalleles | θ (from S) | Nhaplotype | Hd | S | π | Fu's |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1041/170 | 110 | 0.03106 | 43 | 0.948 | 170 | 0.05776 | 11.200/0.1757 | ||
| 59 | 0.00539 | 13 | 0.844 | 25 | 0.00586 | 1.303/0.1175 | |||
| Nguru Mts | 38 | 0.00161 | 6 | 0.751 | 7 | 0.00215 | 1.120/0.0839 | ||
| Usambara Mts | 21 | 0.00375 | 7 | 0.562 | 14 | 0.00239 | -0.458/0.1553 | ||
| Lowland ( | 51 | 0.02034 | 30 | 0.965 | 95 | 0.02068 | -1.521//0.1103 | ||
| 41 | 0.01216 | 22 | 0.948 | 54 | 0.00833 | -3.976**/0.0740 | |||
| 10 | 0.00579 | 8 | 0.956 | 17 | 0.00681 | -1.104/0.1827 | |||
| 559/17 | 184 | 0.00525 | 17 | 0.575 | 17 | 0.00432 | -3.383*/0.0706 | ||
| 118 | 0.00067 | 3 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.00009 | -3.527*/0.0466* | |||
| Nguru Mts | 76 | 0.00036 | 2 | 0.052 | 1 | 0.00009 | -1.248/0.0260** | ||
| Usambara Mts | 42 | 0.00042 | 2 | 0.048 | 1 | 0.00009 | -1.149/0.1525 | ||
| Lowland ( | 66 | 0.00564 | 15 | 0.777 | 15 | 0.00460 | -4.127**/0.0852 | ||
| 58 | 0.00425 | 10 | 0.713 | 11 | 0.00401 | -1.198/0.1018 | |||
| 8 | 0.00483 | 6 | 0.929 | 7 | 0.00530 | -1.637/0.1866 | |||
| 328/15 | 208 | 0.00776 | 20 | 0.827 | 15 | 0.00622 | -7.122**/0.0676 | ||
| 110 | 0.00464 | 11 | 0.824 | 8 | 0.00619 | -1.261/0.1266 | |||
| Nguru Mts | 68 | 0.00511 | 10 | 0.824 | 8 | 0.00683 | -0.934/0.1397 | ||
| Usambara Mts | 42 | 0.00355 | 6 | 0.661 | 5 | 0.00329 | -1.016/0.1074 | ||
| Lowland ( | 98 | 0.00771 | 16 | 0.556 | 13 | 0.00351 | -10.918**/0.0439 | ||
| 70 | 0.00762 | 15 | 0.634 | 12 | 0.00443 | -8.485**/0.0596 | |||
| 28 | 0.00157 | 3 | 0.320 | 2 | 0.00103 | -0.731/0.0840 | |||
| 364/12 | 168 | 0.00530 | 14 | 0.849 | 11 | 0.00768 | -0.914/0.1257 | ||
| 96 | 0.00214 | 4 | 0.639 | 4 | 0.00226 | 0.852/0.1100 | |||
| Nguru Mts | 62 | 0.00264 | 4 | 0.633 | 4 | 0.00264 | 0.947/0.1284 | ||
| Usambara Mts | 34 | 0.00067 | 2 | 0.428 | 1 | 0.00118 | 1.407/0.2139 | ||
| Lowland ( | 72 | 0.00397 | 10 | 0.815 | 7 | 0.00511 | -1.598/0.1328 | ||
| 58 | 0.00415 | 9 | 0.759 | 7 | 0.00508 | -1.221/0.1321 | |||
| 14 | 0.00259 | 4 | 0.692 | 3 | 0.00353 | 0.135/0.2143 | |||
In the absence of selection, significant negative values of Fu's Fs and low values of Rare indicative of population expansion (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). For the three nuclear loci, only alleles with phase probabilities greater than 0.75 were included in the analyses. The subspecies rabai includes all individuals from lowland Tanzania (including the three specimens from SE Tanzania, whereas subspecies debilis only includes individuals from Mozambique and Zimbabwe, see text for details).
Figure 3Assignment of individuals to genetic cluster using the STRUCTURE algorithm for K = 2 (mean LogLikelihood across three runs, -ln = 595.9). The red color corresponds to the individuals sampled in the Nguru and Usambara Mts (albigula). Green corresponds to individuals sampled in the Tanzanian lowland (rabai) and Mozambique/Zimbabwe (debilis). Evidence for admixture involves five individuals sampled in the Nguru Mts, Usambara Mts and on Mt Kanga.
Figure 4Multi-locus network obtained using standardized genetic distances of the three nuclear loci. Only individuals that could be sequenced and phased with a posterior probability greater than 0.75 for all three loci (n = 80) are included.
Median estimate of the TMRCA (in million years before present) for the mtDNA data set.
| Lineage | TMRCA four-fold | TMRCA 2.1% | TMRCA 6.1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 (1.2-7.7) | 7.7 (6.0-9.7) | 2.6 (2.0-3.2) | |
| 0.25 (0.08-0.7) | 0.8 (0.6-1.1) | 0.3 (0.2-0.4) | |
| 0.15 (0.02-0.5) | 0.6 (0.3-0.9) | 0.2 (0.1-0.3) | |
| 1.1 (0.3-2.3) | 2.8 (2.1-3.7) | 0.9 (0.1-1.2) | |
| 0.4 (0.1-0.9) | 0.6 (0.4-0.9) | 0.2 (0.1-0.3) | |
Values in brackets are the 95% HPD. TMRCA were estimated using an uncorrelated lognormal molecular clock model, coalescent prior with constant population size and a mean rate of evolution for the four-fold degenerated sites of 0.073 s/s/myr (95% CI: 0.025-0.123 s/s/myr); 192 sites were included in the analyses.
Estimates of the Isolation with Migration model using IMa.
| Θ1 | 7.019 (4.870-9.659) | 6.531 (4.452-9.194) | 3.266 (1.594-4.9398) | 1.0913 (0.465-1.705) |
| Θ2 | 2.426 (1.480-3.632) | 2.402 (1.502-3.556) | 8.355 (5.881-10.742) | 1.409 (0.584-2.194) |
| ΘA | 21.321 (1.587- 52.328) | 25.909 (1.344-51.185) | 21.068 (0.0261-44.8762) | 8.6927 (0.009-16.221) |
| M12 | 0.109 (0.025-0.245) | 0.0535 (0.005-0.145) | 0.2735 (0.005-0.605) | 2.8637 (0.355-5.305) |
| M21 | 0.123 (0.015-0.345) | 0.093 (0.005-0.195) | 0.186 (0.005-0.365) | 1.113 (0.005-2.465) |
| 2.4 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | |
Values represent the mean of the distribution and the 90% HPD confidence interval.
The posterior distribution of the parameter T possesses a non-zero probability distribution when T increases; the value represents the highest posterior estimate. For this reason we do not discuss the T value from the Isolation with Migration analyses in the text. The estimates for the T parameters are given in million years before present.
Figure 5Biplot of the first two components of the bioclimatic variables extracted from our sampling locality co-ordinates. Note the rather disparate environmental conditions for the albigula sampling points. All sites where gene flow was recorded (e.g. Mt. Kanga) are characterized by reduced seasonality (variable 4).