BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging has made it easier to distinguish among the different types of intracranial mass lesions. Nevertheless, it is sometimes impossible to base a diagnosis solely on clinical and neuroradiologic findings, and, in these cases, biopsy must be performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that proton MR spectroscopy is able to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy in cases of intracranial tumors and may therefore obviate stereotactic biopsy. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with intracranial tumors underwent MR imaging, proton MR spectroscopy, and stereotactic biopsy. MR spectroscopic findings were evaluated for the distribution pattern of pathologic spectra (NAA/Cho ratio < 1) across the lesion and neighboring tissue, for signal ratios in different tumor types, and for their potential to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Gliomas and lymphomas showed pathologic spectra outside the area of contrast enhancement while four nonastrocytic circumscribed tumors (meningioma, pineocytoma, metastasis, and germinoma) showed no pathologic spectra outside the region of enhancement. No significant correlation was found between different tumor types and signal ratios. MR spectroscopy improved diagnostic accuracy by differentiating infiltrative from circumscribed tumors; however, diagnostic accuracy was not improved in terms of differentiating the types of infiltrative or circumscribed lesions. CONCLUSION: MR spectroscopy can improve diagnostic accuracy by differentiating circumscribed brain lesions from histologically infiltrating processes, which may be difficult or impossible solely on the basis of clinical or neuroradiologic findings.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging has made it easier to distinguish among the different types of intracranial mass lesions. Nevertheless, it is sometimes impossible to base a diagnosis solely on clinical and neuroradiologic findings, and, in these cases, biopsy must be performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that proton MR spectroscopy is able to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy in cases of intracranial tumors and may therefore obviate stereotactic biopsy. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with intracranial tumors underwent MR imaging, proton MR spectroscopy, and stereotactic biopsy. MR spectroscopic findings were evaluated for the distribution pattern of pathologic spectra (NAA/Cho ratio < 1) across the lesion and neighboring tissue, for signal ratios in different tumor types, and for their potential to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS:Gliomas and lymphomas showed pathologic spectra outside the area of contrast enhancement while four nonastrocytic circumscribed tumors (meningioma, pineocytoma, metastasis, and germinoma) showed no pathologic spectra outside the region of enhancement. No significant correlation was found between different tumor types and signal ratios. MR spectroscopy improved diagnostic accuracy by differentiating infiltrative from circumscribed tumors; however, diagnostic accuracy was not improved in terms of differentiating the types of infiltrative or circumscribed lesions. CONCLUSION: MR spectroscopy can improve diagnostic accuracy by differentiating circumscribed brain lesions from histologically infiltrating processes, which may be difficult or impossible solely on the basis of clinical or neuroradiologic findings.
Authors: P Demaerel; K Johannik; P Van Hecke; C Van Ongeval; S Verellen; G Marchal; G Wilms; C Plets; J Goffin; F Van Calenbergh Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1991 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: J P Usenius; R A Kauppinen; P A Vainio; J A Hernesniemi; M P Vapalahti; L A Paljärvi; S Soimakallio Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1994 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: P E Sijens; M V Knopp; A Brunetti; K Wicklow; B Alfano; P Bachert; J A Sanders; A E Stillman; H Kett; R Sauter Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: H Shimizu; T Kumabe; T Tominaga; T Kayama; K Hara; Y Ono; K Sato; N Arai; S Fujiwara; T Yoshimoto Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: C Majós; J Alonso; C Aguilera; M Serrallonga; S Coll; J J Acebes; C Arús; J Gili Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2003-02-19 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Amit M Saindane; Soonmee Cha; Meng Law; Xiaonan Xue; Edmond A Knopp; David Zagzag Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sarah Gheuens; Long Ngo; Xiaoen Wang; David C Alsop; Robert E Lenkinski; Igor J Koralnik Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Juan M García-Gómez; Jan Luts; Margarida Julià-Sapé; Patrick Krooshof; Salvador Tortajada; Javier Vicente Robledo; Willem Melssen; Elies Fuster-García; Iván Olier; Geert Postma; Daniel Monleón; Angel Moreno-Torres; Jesús Pujol; Ana-Paula Candiota; M Carmen Martínez-Bisbal; Johan Suykens; Lutgarde Buydens; Bernardo Celda; Sabine Van Huffel; Carles Arús; Montserrat Robles Journal: MAGMA Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 2.310