BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to map the nodal metastases distribution in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (rLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective mapping study included 19 patients with high-risk PCa (sharing at least two out of the three following parameters: PSA >20 ng/ml, cT3, biopsy Gleason score ≥8). All patients were treated with RP, ePLND (removal of the obturator, hypogastric, external iliac, presacral, and common iliac lymph nodes) and rLND (removal of para-aortal/para-caval and inter-aorto-caval lymph nodes) by a single surgeon. All patients signed an informed consent highlighting the absence of clinical data supporting the benefit of this surgical approach. RESULTS: Overall, 18 out of 19 patients (94.7%) had pelvic lymph node invasion. The most commonly affected pelvic nodal landing site was obturator (88.8%), followed by external iliac (83.3%), common iliac (77%), hypogastric (44.4%), and presacral (33.3%). Moreover, 14 (77.8%) patients also had involvement of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Only patients with positive common iliac lymph nodes having at least five positive lower pelvic lymph nodes (n = 14), also had invariably positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes. No patients with negative common iliac lymph nodes had positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: PCa lymphatic spread ascends from the pelvis up to the retroperitoneum invariably through common iliac lymph nodes. PCa lymphatic spread can be divided in two main levels: pelvic and common iliac plus retroperitoneal lymph nodes.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to map the nodal metastases distribution in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (rLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective mapping study included 19 patients with high-risk PCa (sharing at least two out of the three following parameters: PSA >20 ng/ml, cT3, biopsy Gleason score ≥8). All patients were treated with RP, ePLND (removal of the obturator, hypogastric, external iliac, presacral, and common iliac lymph nodes) and rLND (removal of para-aortal/para-caval and inter-aorto-caval lymph nodes) by a single surgeon. All patients signed an informed consent highlighting the absence of clinical data supporting the benefit of this surgical approach. RESULTS: Overall, 18 out of 19 patients (94.7%) had pelvic lymph node invasion. The most commonly affected pelvic nodal landing site was obturator (88.8%), followed by external iliac (83.3%), common iliac (77%), hypogastric (44.4%), and presacral (33.3%). Moreover, 14 (77.8%) patients also had involvement of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Only patients with positive common iliac lymph nodes having at least five positive lower pelvic lymph nodes (n = 14), also had invariably positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes. No patients with negative common iliac lymph nodes had positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: PCa lymphatic spread ascends from the pelvis up to the retroperitoneum invariably through common iliac lymph nodes. PCa lymphatic spread can be divided in two main levels: pelvic and common iliac plus retroperitoneal lymph nodes.
Authors: Stefan A Koerber; Gerald Stach; Clemens Kratochwil; Matthias F Haefner; Henrik Rathke; Klaus Herfarth; Klaus Kopka; Tim Holland-Letz; Peter L Choyke; Uwe Haberkorn; Juergen Debus; Frederik L Giesel Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Carlo A Bravi; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nazareno Suardi; Elio Mazzone; Daniele Robesti; Daniar Osmonov; Klaus-Peter Juenemann; Luca Boeri; R Jeffrey Karnes; Alexander Kretschmer; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Andreas Hiester; Alessandro Nini; Peter Albers; Gaëtan Devos; Steven Joniau; Hendrik Van Poppel; Shahrokh F Shariat; Axel Heidenreich; David Pfister; Derya Tilki; Markus Graefen; Inderbir S Gill; Alexander Mottrie; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 24.267
Authors: Nicola Fossati; Nazareno Suardi; Giorgio Gandaglia; Carlo A Bravi; Matteo Soligo; R Jeffrey Karnes; Shahrokh Shariat; Antonino Battaglia; Wouter Everaerts; Steven Joniau; Hendrik Van Poppel; Nieroshan Rajarubendra; Inderbir S Gill; Alessandro Larcher; Alexander Mottrie; Maximilian Schmautz; Axel Heidenreich; Almut Kalz; Daniar Osmonov; Klaus-Peter Juenemann; Annika Herlemann; Christian Gratzke; Christian Stief; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 24.267
Authors: Stefano Mangiola; Matthew K H Hong; Marek Cmero; Natalie Kurganovs; Andrew Ryan; Anthony J Costello; Niall M Corcoran; Geoff Macintyre; Christopher M Hovens Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.379