Literature DB >> 30301694

Identifying the Optimal Candidate for Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Results from a Large, Multi-institutional Analysis.

Nicola Fossati1, Nazareno Suardi1, Giorgio Gandaglia1, Carlo A Bravi1, Matteo Soligo2, R Jeffrey Karnes2, Shahrokh Shariat3, Antonino Battaglia4, Wouter Everaerts4, Steven Joniau4, Hendrik Van Poppel4, Nieroshan Rajarubendra5, Inderbir S Gill5, Alessandro Larcher6, Alexander Mottrie6, Maximilian Schmautz7, Axel Heidenreich7, Almut Kalz8, Daniar Osmonov8, Klaus-Peter Juenemann8, Annika Herlemann9, Christian Gratzke10, Christian Stief9, Francesco Montorsi1, Alberto Briganti11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) represents a possible treatment option for prostate cancer patients affected by nodal recurrence after local treatment. However, SLND may be associated with intra- and postoperative complications, and the oncological benefit may be limited to specific groups of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal candidates for SLND based on preoperative characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 654 patients who experienced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise and nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and underwent SLND at nine tertiary referral centers. Lymph node recurrence was documented by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan using either 11C-choline or 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand. INTERVENTION: SLND. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The study outcome was early clinical recurrence (eCR) developed within 1 yr after SLND. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to develop a predictive model. Multivariable-derived coefficients were used to develop a novel risk calculator. Decision-curve analysis was used to evaluate the net benefit of the predictive model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median follow-up was 30 (interquartile range, 16-50) mo among patients without clinical recurrence (CR), and 334 patients developed CR after SLND. In particular, eCR at 1 yr after SLND was observed in 150 patients, with a Kaplan-Meier probability of eCR equal to 25%. The development of eCR was significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality at 3 yr, being 20% versus 1.4% in patients with and without eCR, respectively (p<0.0001). At multivariable analysis, Gleason grade group 5 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.04; p<0.0001), time from RP to PSA rising (HR: 0.99; p=0.025), hormonal therapy administration at PSA rising after RP (HR: 1.47; p=0.0005), retroperitoneal uptake at PET/CT scan (HR: 1.24; p=0.038), three or more positive spots at PET/CT scan (HR: 1.26; p=0.019), and PSA level at SLND (HR: 1.05; p<0.0001) were significant predictors of CR after SLND. The coefficients of the predictive model were used to develop a risk calculator for eCR at 1 yr after SLND. The discrimination of the model (Harrel'sC index) was 0.75. At decision-curve analysis, the net benefit of the model was higher than the "treat-all" option at all the threshold probabilities.
CONCLUSIONS: We reported the largest available series of patients treated with SLND. Roughly 25% of men developed eCR after surgery. We developed the first risk stratification tool to identify the optimal candidate to SLND based on routinely available preoperative characteristics. This tool can be useful to avoid use of SLND in men more likely to progress despite any imaging-guided approach. PATIENT
SUMMARY: The risk of early recurrence after salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) was approximately 25%. In this study, we developed a novel tool to predict the risk of early failure after SLND. This tool will be useful to identify patients who would benefit the most from SLND from other patients who should be spared from surgery.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymph node excision; Neoplasm recurrence; Positron emission tomography computed tomography; Prostatic neoplasms; Salvage therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30301694      PMCID: PMC9084635          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   24.267


  23 in total

1.  Salvage lymph node dissection for prostate cancer nodal recurrence detected by 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography.

Authors:  R Jeffrey Karnes; Christopher R Murphy; Eric J Bergstralh; Guy DiMonte; John C Cheville; Val J Lowe; Lance A Mynderse; Eugene D Kwon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The role of salvage extended lymph node dissection in patients with rising PSA and PET/CT scan detected nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Porres; D Pfister; A Thissen; T H Kuru; V Zugor; R Buettner; R Knuechel; F A Verburg; A Heidenreich
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Prognostic factors influencing prostate cancer-specific survival in non-castrate patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Piet Ost; Karel Decaestecker; Bieke Lambert; Valérie Fonteyne; Louke Delrue; Nicolaas Lumen; Filip Ameye; Gert De Meerleer
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Philip Cornford; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Maria De Santis; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Thomas Wiegel; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Nicola Fossati; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Vsevolod B Matveev; Paul C Moldovan; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Thomas Van den Broeck; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Thomas Wiegel; Philip Cornford
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Identifying optimal candidates for local treatment of the primary tumor among patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer: a SEER-based study.

Authors:  Nicola Fossati; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jesse Sammon; Akshay Sood; Alessandro Larcher; Maxine Sun; Pierre Karakiewicz; Giorgio Guazzoni; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Mani Menon; Firas Abdollah
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Impact of the Site of Metastases on Survival in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Niccolò Maria Passoni; Jonas Schiffmann; Vincent Trudeau; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Operational characteristics of (11)c-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence after initial treatment.

Authors:  Christopher R Mitchell; Val J Lowe; Laureano J Rangel; Joseph C Hung; Eugene D Kwon; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Metastasis-directed therapy of regional and distant recurrences after curative treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Piet Ost; Alberto Bossi; Karel Decaestecker; Gert De Meerleer; Gianluca Giannarini; R Jeffrey Karnes; Mack Roach; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Surveillance or Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial.

Authors:  Piet Ost; Dries Reynders; Karel Decaestecker; Valérie Fonteyne; Nicolaas Lumen; Aurélie De Bruycker; Bieke Lambert; Louke Delrue; Renée Bultijnck; Tom Claeys; Els Goetghebeur; Geert Villeirs; Kathia De Man; Filip Ameye; Ignace Billiet; Steven Joniau; Friedl Vanhaverbeke; Gert De Meerleer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  27 in total

1.  The role of salvage lymph node dissection and PSMA-PET in recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kalampokis; Nikolaos Grivas
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

Review 2.  Expanding the role of small-molecule PSMA ligands beyond PET staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shankar Siva; Cristian Udovicich; Ben Tran; Homi Zargar; Declan G Murphy; Michael S Hofman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Management of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC): an Evolving Treatment Paradigm.

Authors:  Adam B Weiner; Oluwarotimi S Nettey; Alicia K Morgans
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 4.  Trends in Management of Oligometastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Gargi Kothari; Piet Ost; Patrick Cheung; Pierre Blanchard; Alison C Tree; Nicholas J van As; Simon S Lo; Drew Moghanaki; Andrew Loblaw; Shankar Siva
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  The role of surgery in high risk and advanced prostate cancer: A narrative review.

Authors:  Chloe Sheila Dayan Roy; Ashwin Sachdeva; Gokul Vignesh Kandaswamy; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-30

6.  Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of local tumor and lymph node metastases in early biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maija Radzina; Mara Tirane; Lilita Roznere; Liene Zemniece; Laura Dronka; Marika Kalnina; Edgars Mamis; Juergen Biederer; Vilnis Lietuvietis; Arvis Freimanis; Egils Vjaters
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 7.  Navigating systemic therapy for metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer.

Authors:  E M Kwan; I A Thangasamy; J Teh; O Alghazo; N J Sathianathen; N Lawrentschuk; A A Azad
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [18F]Fluciclovine-PET Guided Salvage Lymph Node Dissection Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Carli E Calderone; Jeffrey W Nix; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus.

Authors:  Eliney Ferreira Faria; Carlos Vaz Melo Maciel; André Berger; Anuar Mitre; Breno Dauster; Celso Heitor Freitas; Clovis Fraga; Daher Chade; Marcos Dall'Oglio; Francisco Carvalho; Franz Campos; Gustavo Franco Carvalhal; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Gustavo Guimarães; Hamilton Zampolli; Joao Ricardo Alves; Joao Pádua Manzano; Marco Antônio Fortes; Marcos Flavio Holanda Rocha; Mauricio Rubinstein; Murilo Luz; Pedro Romanelli; Rafael Coelho; Raphael Rocha; Roberto Dias Machado; Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis; Stenio Zequi; Romulo Guida; Valdair Muglia; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-11

10.  18F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography guided laparoscopic salvage lymph node dissection in patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Markiian Kubis; Krystian Kaczmarek; Artur Lemiński; Marcin Słojewski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.