Literature DB >> 21538049

Metabolic effects of contraceptive steroids.

Regine Sitruk-Ware1, Anita Nath.   

Abstract

Estrogen and progestins have been used by millions of women as effective combined contraceptives. The safety of hormonal contraceptives has been documented by years of follow-up and serious adverse events that may be related to their use are rare in the young population exposed to these agents. The balance between the benefits and the risks of contraceptive steroids is generally positive in particular when comparing to the risks of pregnancy and especially in women with risk factors. The metabolic changes induced by the synthetic steroids used in contraception, such as lipoprotein changes, insulin response to glucose, and coagulation factors have been considered as potential markers of cardiovascular and venous risk. Observations of these effects have led to modifications of the composition of hormonal contraceptive in order to minimize these changes and hence potentially decrease the risks. The synthetic estrogen Ethinyl-Estradiol (EE) exerts a stronger effect that natural estradiol (E2) on hepatic metabolism including estrogen-dependent markers such as liver proteins. This stronger hepatic impact of EE has been related to its 17α-ethinyl group which prevents the inactivation of the molecule and results in a more pronounced hepatic effect of EE as compared to estradiol. Due to its strong activity, administering EE via a non-oral route does not prevent its impact on liver proteins. In order to circumvent the metabolic changes induced by EE, newer products using more natural compounds such as estradiol (E2) and estradiol valerate (E2V) have been introduced. The synthetic progestins used for contraception are structurally related either to testosterone (T) (estranes and gonanes) or to progesterone (pregnanes and 19-norpregnanes). Several new progestins have been designed to bind more specifically to the progesterone receptor and to minimize side-effects related to androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid receptor interactions. Dienogest (DNG), and drospirenone (DRSP) and the 19-norpregnanes including Nestorone® (NES), nomegestrol acetate (NOMAc) and trimegestone (TMG) have been combined with estrogen either EE or E2 or estradiol valerate (E2V). Risks and benefits of the newer progestins used in contraception depend upon the type of molecular structure, the type and dose of estrogen associated in a combination and the route of administration. The lower metabolic impact of estradiol-based combinations may result in an improved safety profile, but large surveillance studies are warranted to confirm this plausible hypothesis. So far, the contraindications and warnings for use of current COCs also apply to the estradiol-based COCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21538049     DOI: 10.1007/s11154-011-9182-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord        ISSN: 1389-9155            Impact factor:   6.514


  87 in total

1.  Effects of two combined oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol 20 microg combined with either drospirenone or desogestrel on lipids, hemostatic parameters and carbohydrate metabolism.

Authors:  Christine Klipping; Joachim Marr
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Comparative effects of a contraceptive vaginal ring delivering a nonandrogenic progestin and continuous ethinyl estradiol and a combined oral contraceptive containing levonorgestrel on hemostasis variables.

Authors:  Mandana Rad; Cornelis Kluft; Joël Ménard; Jacobus Burggraaf; Marieke L de Kam; Piet Meijer; Irving Sivin; Regine L Sitruk-Ware
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Hormonal contraception: present and future.

Authors:  Giuseppe Benagiano; Carlo Bastianelli; Manuela Farris
Journal:  Drugs Today (Barc)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.245

Review 4.  Effects of progestogens on haemostasis.

Authors:  H Kuhl
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  The association between the combined oral contraceptive pill and insulin resistance, dysglycemia and dyslipidemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Ilana J Halperin; Shoba Sujana Kumar; Donna F Stroup; Sheila E Laredo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Low-dose contraceptive estrogen-progestin and coronary artery atherosclerosis of monkeys.

Authors:  M R Adams; M S Anthony; J M Manning; D L Golden; J S Parks
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Comparison of pharmacodynamic properties of various estrogen formulations.

Authors:  C A Mashchak; R A Lobo; R Dozono-Takano; P Eggena; R M Nakamura; P F Brenner; D R Mishell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Oral progestogen-only contraceptives and cardiovascular risk: results from the Transnational Study on Oral Contraceptives and the Health of Young Women.

Authors:  L A Heinemann; A Assmann; T DoMinh; E Garbe
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Insulin resistance, secretion, and elimination in postmenopausal women receiving oral or transdermal hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  I F Godsland; K Gangar; C Walton; M P Cust; M I Whitehead; V Wynn; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.694

10.  Dienogest is a selective progesterone receptor agonist in transactivation analysis with potent oral endometrial activity due to its efficient pharmacokinetic profile.

Authors:  Shinichi Sasagawa; Yutaka Shimizu; Hideaki Kami; Takashi Takeuchi; Shizuka Mita; Kazunori Imada; Shigeaki Kato; Kiyoshi Mizuguchi
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 2.668

View more
  26 in total

1.  Maximal fat oxidation, but not aerobic capacity, is affected by oral contraceptive use in young healthy women.

Authors:  Laurie Isacco; David Thivel; Bruno Pereira; Martine Duclos; Nathalie Boisseau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Half a century of the oral contraceptive pill: historical review and view to the future.

Authors:  Pamela Verma Liao; Janet Dollin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Hormonal Contraception and Risk of Psychiatric and Other Noncommunicable Diseases in HIV-Infected Women.

Authors:  Jessica L Castilho; Cathy A Jenkins; Bryan E Shepherd; Sally S Bebawy; Megan Turner; Timothy R Sterling; Vlada V Melekhin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Estrogen and thrombosis: A bench to bedside review.

Authors:  Mouhamed Yazan Abou-Ismail; Divyaswathi Citla Sridhar; Lalitha Nayak
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 5.  Estrogen and thrombosis: controversies and common sense.

Authors:  Thomas G DeLoughery
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 6.  Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  E Carmina
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  The patient with Turner syndrome: puberty and medical management concerns.

Authors:  Luisa Gonzalez; Selma Feldman Witchel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  [Efficacy and metabolic safety of long-term treatment with ethinyl oestradiol/cyproterone and desogestrel/ethinyl oestradiol tablets in women with polycystic ovary syndrome].

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mi Su; Liangzhi Xu; Zhilan Yang; Weiyao Yin; Ying Nie; Xiaoyong Qiao; Ran Cheng; Yaxian Ma
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-07-30

9.  Nomegestrol acetate/estradiol: in oral contraception.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Using changes in binding globulins to assess oral contraceptive compliance.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Kelsey A Petrie; Serge Cremers
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.