Literature DB >> 22795088

Using changes in binding globulins to assess oral contraceptive compliance.

Carolyn L Westhoff1, Kelsey A Petrie, Serge Cremers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Validity of oral contraceptive pill (OCP) clinical trial results depends on participant compliance. Ethinyl estradiol (EE2) induces increases in hepatic binding globulin (BG) levels. Measuring these BG increases may provide an effective and convenient approach to distinguish noncompliant from compliant OCP users in research settings. This analysis evaluated the usefulness of measuring increases in corticosteroid-, sex-hormone- and thyroxine-binding globulins (CBG, SHBG and TBG, respectively) as measures of OCP compliance.
METHODS: We used frozen serum from a trial that compared ovarian suppression between normal-weight and obese women randomized to one of two OCPs containing EE2 and levonorgestrel (LNG). Based on serial LNG measurements during the trial, 17% of participants were noncompliant. We matched noncompliant participants with compliant participants by age, body mass index, ethnicity and OCP formulation. We measured CBG, SHBG and TBG levels and compared change from baseline to 3-month follow-up between the noncompliant and compliant participants. Construction of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves allowed comparison of various BG measures.
RESULTS: Changes in CBG and TBG distinguished OCP noncompliant users from compliant users [area under the ROC curve (AUROC), 0.86 and 0.89, p<.01]. Changes in SHBG were less discriminating (AUROC 0.69)
CONCLUSIONS: EE2-induced increases in CBG and TBG provide a sensitive integrated marker of compliance with an LNG-containing OCP.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795088      PMCID: PMC3494777          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  29 in total

1.  Predictors of noncompliance in an oral contraceptive clinical trial.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Anupama T Torgal; Elizabeth R Mayeda; Noa'a Shimoni; Frank Z Stanczyk; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Elevation of certain plasma proteins in man following estrogen administration: a dose-response relationship.

Authors:  B U Musa; U S Seal; R P Doe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of ethynyl estrogens in various populations. I. Ethynylestradiol.

Authors:  J W Goldzieher; T S Dozier; A de la Pena
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Effect of low-dose oral contraceptives on androgenic markers and acne.

Authors:  I H Thorneycroft; F Z Stanczyk; K D Bradshaw; S A Ballagh; M Nichols; M E Weber
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 5.  Pharmacology of estradiol valerate/dienogest.

Authors:  A Teichmann
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.005

6.  Serum steroid binding protein concentrations, distribution of progestogens, and bioavailability of testosterone during treatment with contraceptives containing desogestrel or levonorgestrel.

Authors:  G L Hammond; M S Langley; P A Robinson; S Nummi; L Lund
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  A randomized cross-over comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives upon hormonal and metabolic serum parameters: II. Effects upon thyroid function, gastrin, STH, and glucose tolerance.

Authors:  H Kuhl; G Gahn; G Romberg; P H Althoff; H D Taubert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Plasma hormone levels in women receiving new oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol plus levonorgestrel or desogestrel.

Authors:  U J Gaspard; M A Romus; D Gillain; J Duvivier; E Demey-Ponsart; P Franchimont
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Effect of four different oral contraceptives on various sex hormones and serum-binding globulins.

Authors:  I Wiegratz; E Kutschera; J H Lee; C Moore; U Mellinger; U H Winkler; H Kuhl
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 10.  Human corticosteroid binding globulin.

Authors:  T G Brien
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.478

View more
  7 in total

1.  Endogenous thrombin potential changes during the first cycle of oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Malcolm C Pike; Serge Cremers; Andrew Eisenberger; Stella Thomassen; Jan Rosing
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Estimating systemic exposure to levonorgestrel from an oral contraceptive.

Authors:  Cale N Basaraba; Carolyn L Westhoff; Malcolm C Pike; Renu Nandakumar; Serge Cremers
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Estimating systemic exposure to ethinyl estradiol from an oral contraceptive.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Malcolm C Pike; Rosalind Tang; Marianne N DiNapoli; Monica Sull; Serge Cremers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Association of hormonal contraceptive use with reduced levels of depressive symptoms: a national study of sexually active women in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Keely Cheslack-Postava; Carolyn Westhoff; Christine M Heim; Michelle Haloossim; Kate Walsh; Karestan Koenen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The association of menstrual and reproductive factors with thyroid nodules in Chinese women older than 40 years of age.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Yu Yang; Yang Wu; Jie Chen; Danyu Zhang; Chao Liu
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Clotting factor changes during the first cycle of oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Andrew Eisenberger; Rosalind Tang; Serge Cremers; Lisa V Grossman; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Assessing the validity and reliability of self-report data on contraception use in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Chris Smith; Phil Edwards; Caroline Free
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.