BACKGROUND: X-ray magnetic resonance fusion (XMRF) allows for use of 3D data during cardiac catheterization. However, to date, technical requirements have limited the use of this modality in clinical practice. We report on a new internal-marker XMRF method that we have developed and describe how we used XMRF during cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: XMRF was performed in a phantom and in 23 patients presenting for cardiac catheterization who also needed cardiac MRI for clinical reasons. The registration process was performed in < 5 minutes per patient, with minimal radiation (0.004 to 0.024 mSv) and without contrast. Registration error was calculated in a phantom and in 8 patients using the maximum distance between angiographic and 3D model boundaries. In the phantom, the measured error in the anteroposterior projection had a mean of 1.15 mm (standard deviation, 0.73). The measured error in patients had a median of 2.15 mm (interquartile range, 1.65 to 2.56 mm). Internal markers included bones, airway, image artifact, calcifications, and the heart and vessel borders. The MRI data were used for road mapping in 17 of 23 (74%) cases and camera angle selection in 11 of 23 (48%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Internal marker-based registration can be performed quickly, with minimal radiation, without the need for contrast, and with clinically acceptable accuracy using commercially available software. We have also demonstrated several potential uses for XMRF in routine clinical practice. This modality has the potential to reduce radiation exposure and improve catheterization outcomes.
BACKGROUND: X-ray magnetic resonance fusion (XMRF) allows for use of 3D data during cardiac catheterization. However, to date, technical requirements have limited the use of this modality in clinical practice. We report on a new internal-marker XMRF method that we have developed and describe how we used XMRF during cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: XMRF was performed in a phantom and in 23 patients presenting for cardiac catheterization who also needed cardiac MRI for clinical reasons. The registration process was performed in < 5 minutes per patient, with minimal radiation (0.004 to 0.024 mSv) and without contrast. Registration error was calculated in a phantom and in 8 patients using the maximum distance between angiographic and 3D model boundaries. In the phantom, the measured error in the anteroposterior projection had a mean of 1.15 mm (standard deviation, 0.73). The measured error in patients had a median of 2.15 mm (interquartile range, 1.65 to 2.56 mm). Internal markers included bones, airway, image artifact, calcifications, and the heart and vessel borders. The MRI data were used for road mapping in 17 of 23 (74%) cases and camera angle selection in 11 of 23 (48%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Internal marker-based registration can be performed quickly, with minimal radiation, without the need for contrast, and with clinically acceptable accuracy using commercially available software. We have also demonstrated several potential uses for XMRF in routine clinical practice. This modality has the potential to reduce radiation exposure and improve catheterization outcomes.
Authors: Luis F Gutiérrez; Ranil de Silva; Cengizhan Ozturk; Merdim Sonmez; Annette M Stine; Amish N Raval; Venkatesh K Raman; Vandana Sachdev; Ronnier J Aviles; Myron A Waclawiw; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ranil de Silva; Luis F Gutiérrez; Amish N Raval; Elliot R McVeigh; Cengizhan Ozturk; Robert J Lederman Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-11-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kawal S Rhode; Derek L G Hill; Philip J Edwards; John Hipwell; Daniel Rueckert; Gerardo Sanchez-Ortiz; Sanjeet Hegde; Vithuran Rahunathan; Reza Razavi Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Osamah Aldoss; Brian M Fonseca; Uyen T Truong; John Bracken; Jeffrey R Darst; Ruixin Guo; Tamekia L Jones; Thomas E Fagan Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Sphoorti Shellikeri; Randolph M Setser; Seth Vatsky; Abhay Srinivasan; Ganesh Krishnamurthy; Xiaowei Zhu; Marc S Keller; Anne Marie Cahill Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2017-11-12
Authors: Thomas E Fagan; Uyen T Truong; Pei-Ni Jone; John Bracken; Robert Quaife; Anas A Abu Hazeem; Ernesto E Salcedo; Brian M Fonseca Journal: Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J Date: 2014 Apr-Jun