Literature DB >> 21254798

Event-related repetitive TMS reveals distinct, critical roles for right OFA and bilateral posterior STS in judging the sex and trustworthiness of faces.

Milena P Dzhelyova1, Amanda Ellison, Anthony P Atkinson.   

Abstract

Judging the sex of faces relies on cues related to facial morphology and spatial relations between features, whereas judging the trustworthiness of faces relies on both structural and expressive cues that signal affective valence. The right occipital face area (OFA) processes structural cues and has been associated with sex judgments, whereas the posterior STS processes changeable facial cues related to muscle movements and is activated when observers judge trustworthiness. It is commonly supposed that the STS receives inputs from the OFA, yet it is unknown whether these regions have functionally dissociable, critical roles in sex and trustworthiness judgments. We addressed this issue using event-related, fMRI-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Twelve healthy volunteers judged the sex of individually presented faces and, in a separate session, whether those same faces were trustworthy or not. Relative to sham stimulation, RTs were significantly longer for sex judgments when rTMS was delivered over the right OFA but not the right or left STS, and for trustworthiness judgments on male but not female faces when rTMS was delivered over the right STS or left STS but not the right OFA. Nonetheless, an analysis of the RT distributions revealed a possible critical role also for the right OFA in trustworthiness judgments, limited to faces with longer RTs, perhaps reflecting the later, ancillary use of structural cues related to the sex of the face. On the whole, our findings provide evidence that evaluations of the trustworthiness and sex of faces rely on functionally dissociable cortical regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21254798     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Emotion recognition deficits as predictors of transition in individuals at clinical high risk for schizophrenia: a neurodevelopmental perspective.

Authors:  C M Corcoran; J G Keilp; J Kayser; C Klim; P D Butler; G E Bruder; R C Gur; D C Javitt
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 2.  The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity.

Authors:  Anthony P Atkinson; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Brain systems for assessing the affective value of faces.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; James V Haxby; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Bruce Luber; Courtney A Crowell; Susan A Hilbig; Wesley Lim; Duy Nguyen; Nicolas A Chrapliwy; Simon W Davis; Roberto Cabeza; Sarah H Lisanby; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Facial emotion processing in patients with social anxiety disorder and Williams-Beuren syndrome: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Cynthia Binelli; Armando Muñiz; Susana Subira; Ricard Navines; Laura Blanco-Hinojo; Debora Perez-Garcia; Jose Crippa; Magi Farré; Luis Pérez-Jurado; Jesus Pujol; Rocio Martin-Santos
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Influence of task instructions and stimuli on the neural network of face processing: An ALE meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veronika I Müller; Yvonne Höhner; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Hands as sex cues: sensitivity measures, male bias measures, and implications for sex perception mechanisms.

Authors:  Justin Gaetano; Rick van der Zwan; Duncan Blair; Anna Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Electrical stimulation over bilateral occipito-temporal regions reduces N170 in the right hemisphere and the composite face effect.

Authors:  Li-Zhuang Yang; Wei Zhang; Bin Shi; Zhiyu Yang; Zhengde Wei; Feng Gu; Jing Zhang; Guanbao Cui; Ying Liu; Yifeng Zhou; Xiaochu Zhang; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Increased Accuracy of Emotion Recognition in Individuals with Autism-Like Traits after Five Days of Magnetic Stimulations.

Authors:  Pingping Liu; Guixian Xiao; Kongliang He; Long Zhang; Xinqi Wu; Dandan Li; Chunyan Zhu; Yanghua Tian; Panpan Hu; Bensheng Qiu; Gong-Jun Ji; Kai Wang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Tuning Eye-Gaze Perception by Transitory STS Inhibition.

Authors:  Ana Saitovitch; Traian Popa; Hervé Lemaitre; Elza Rechtman; Jean-Charles Lamy; David Grévent; Raphael Calmon; Sabine Meunier; Francis Brunelle; Yves Samson; Nathalie Boddaert; Monica Zilbovicius
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.