Literature DB >> 9772245

Muscle activation patterns during two types of voluntary single-joint movement.

G L Gottlieb1.   

Abstract

We examined the systematic variations in the EMG patterns during two types of single joint elbow movements. These patterns may be interpreted as exhibiting rules by which the CNS controls movement parameters. Normal human subjects performed two series of fast elbow flexion movements of 20-100 degrees in a horizontal plane manipulandum. The first series consisted of pointing movements (PMs) from an initial position to a target; the second series consisted of reversal movements (RMs) to the same targets with an immediate return to the starting position. Both series showed kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) patterns that followed our previously described speed-insensitive strategy for controlling movement distance. Kinematic patterns of PMs and RMs were identical to about the time of peak PM deceleration. Agonist EMG bursts were also initially the same, but RM bursts ended abruptly in a silent period, whereas PM bursts declined more gradually. Antagonist EMG bursts of RMs were later than those of PMs but were not larger, contrary to our prior expectation and despite the larger net extension torque during RMs. The increase in net RM extension-directed torque that takes the limb back to its initial position appears to be a consequence of reduced flexor muscle torque rather than increased extensor muscle torque. We propose that rules for movement control may be similar for different kinds of movements as long as they are functionally sufficient for the task. However, even in a single-joint movement paradigm, physics alone, that is, the knowledge of net muscle torque and limb kinematics, is not adequate to fully predict those rules or the muscle activation patterns they produce. These must be discovered by experiment. The simplest expression of such rules may not be in terms of torque or kinematic variables but rather explicitly in terms of muscle activation patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9772245     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.4.1860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Rapid correction of aimed movements by summation of force-field primitives.

Authors:  W J Kargo; S F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Muscle strength testing: evaluation of tests of explosive force production.

Authors:  Dragan M Mirkov; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Sladjan Milanovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Influence of biomechanical factors on substructure of pointing movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Deric Wisleder; Travis Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of different submovement types during pointing to a target.

Authors:  Deric Wisleder; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of ipsilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation on the triphasic EMG pattern accompanying fast ballistic movements in humans.

Authors:  Kerstin Irlbacher; Martin Voss; Bernd-Ulrich Meyer; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Control of velocity and position in single joint movements.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 8.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; J Lucas McKay
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke.

Authors:  David J Clark; Lena H Ting; Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Spinal cord modularity: evolution, development, and optimization and the possible relevance to low back pain in man.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Corey B Hart; Sheri P Silfies
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.