Literature DB >> 21533598

Postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1 and 2 curves: how common is it? and analysis of risk factors.

Per D Trobisch1, Amer F Samdani, Joshua M Pahys, Patrick J Cahill.   

Abstract

The goal of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is to achieve a solid fusion in a balanced spine. While many previous studies analyzed coronal balance, there is a paucity of studies that comment on postoperative trunk shift, which has shown to have impact on clinical outcome. The purpose of this retrospective, multicenter data analysis was to analyze the incidence of postoperative trunk shift in patients with surgical treatment for AIS. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter data analysis of 1,555 patients with AIS. Patients with a Lenke type 1 or 2 curve pattern and a minimum follow-up of 24 months after surgery were included. A >2 cm deviation of the trunk in relation to the pelvis was considered positive trunk shift. A subanalysis was performed to identify potential risk factors for trunk shift. 273 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. While the preoperative prevalence of trunk shift was surgically reduced from 29.3 to 13.6%, 24 patients (8.8%) with postoperative trunk shift had not had preoperative trunk shift, and the trunk shift was considered iatrogenic. Undercorrection of the lumbar curve was identified as potential risk factor, whereas thoracic correction, coronal balance, angulation and translation of the lowest instrumented vertebra did not seem to influence postoperative trunk shift. Iatrogenic postoperative trunk shift has an incidence of 8.8% in the surgical treatment of AIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21533598      PMCID: PMC3176686          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1820-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  10 in total

1.  Geometric analysis of coronal decompensation in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; A Rimkus; T M Gavin; M Bueche; K P Meade; R Bielski; K Ibrahim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Assessment of trunk balance in thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  B Stephens Richards; Anthony Scaduto; Kelly Vanderhave; Richard Browne
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Analysis of the lowest instrumented vertebra following anterior spinal fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can we predict postoperative disc wedging?

Authors:  Kotaro Satake; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Kathy M Blanke; Brenda Sides; Karen Steger-May
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Determination of distal fusion level with segmental pedicle screw fixation in single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Se-Il Suk; Sang-Min Lee; Ewy-Ryong Chung; Jin-Hyok Kim; Won-Joong Kim; Hong-Moon Sohn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The influence of spine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients' health-related quality of life questionnaire responses.

Authors:  Marc Asher; Sue Min Lai; Doug Burton; Barbara Manna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis: an assessment of the Lenke classification.

Authors:  Rolando M Puno; Ki-Chan An; Raquel L Puno; Ashley Jacob; Sung-Soo Chung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Selection of fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using fulcrum bending prediction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Keith D K Luk; Angus S Don; Chee S Chong; Yat W Wong; Kenneth M Cheung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Osteotomy of the fusion mass in scoliosis.

Authors:  Y Floman; J N Penny; L J Micheli; E J Riseborough; J E Hall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Can we predict the ultimate lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing a selective fusion with undercorrection of the thoracic curve?

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; Lawrence G Lenke; Tim Walton; Michael Peelle; Greg Della Rocca; Karen Steger-May; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Fixed lumbar apical vertebral rotation predicts spinal decompensation in Lenke type 3C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion.

Authors:  Hannes Behensky; Ashley A Cole; Brian J C Freeman; Michael P Grevitt; Hossein S Mehdian; John K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Accurate prediction of spontaneous lumbar curve correction following posterior selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using logistic regression models and clinical rationale.

Authors:  H Koller; W Hitzl; M C Marks; P O Newton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Parameters leading to a successful radiographic outcome following surgical treatment for Lenke 2 curves.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Anna McClung; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Daniel Sucato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp; Georg Gosheger; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias Lange; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Cody Eric Bünger; Thomas Andersen; Haolin Sun; Chunsen Wu; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Analysis of factors that affect shoulder balance after correction surgery in scoliosis: a global analysis of all the curvature types.

Authors:  Jae-Young Hong; Seung-Woo Suh; Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Si-Young Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Preventing Fusion Mass Shift Avoids Postoperative Distal Curve Adding-on in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Mauro Bruzzone; Hiroaki Matsumori; Kin-Cheung Mak; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Spinal balance and lumbar curve stability after selective thoracic fusion in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Aaron Gebrelul; Ann Marie Karam; Kiley Poppino; Chan-Hee Jo; B Stephens Richards
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 8.  Selective Thoracic Fusion for King-Moe Type II/Lenke 1C Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Review of Major Concerns.

Authors:  Masayuki Ishikawa; Makoto Nishiyama; Michihiro Kamata
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-10-10

9.  Evaluation of balance in young adults with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Füsun Şahin; Özkan Urak; Nuray Akkaya
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-08-08

10.  The effect of growing Rod treatment on coronal balance during serial lengthening surgeries in early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Wen-jing Li; Zhi-jian Sun; Shi-gong Guo; Gui-xing Qiu; Jian-guo Zhang; Jian-xiong Shen; Yi-peng Wang; Hong Zhao; Shu-gang Li; Yu Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.