Literature DB >> 27072316

The effect of growing Rod treatment on coronal balance during serial lengthening surgeries in early onset scoliosis.

Wen-jing Li1, Zhi-jian Sun1, Shi-gong Guo2, Gui-xing Qiu1, Jian-guo Zhang1, Jian-xiong Shen1, Yi-peng Wang1, Hong Zhao1, Shu-gang Li1, Yu Zhao3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gaining and maintaining spinal balance after surgery is of great importance for early onset scoliosis (EOS). However, tendency of balance on the coronal plane after growing rod surgery has not been studied before. This study evaluated the effect of growing rod treatment on coronal balance (CB) during serial lengthening surgeries in EOS.
METHODS: All EOS patients treated with growing rod technique in our hospital from August 2002 to June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic data before the sixth lengthening surgery were measured on the posteroanterior X-ray images, including global CB (C7 plumbline-central sacral vertical line, C7PL-CSVL), regional CB (apical vertebrae-CSVL), Cobb angle of the main curve and pelvic inlet width (PIW). Global CB index and regional CB index were calculated as dividing global CB and regional CB by PIW, respectively. The changes of these parameters during repeated lengthening surgeries were analyzed.
RESULTS: Five hundred seventy Radiographs of 67 patients, including 134 images before and after growing rod insertion surgeries and 436 images pre- and post-lengthening surgeries were measured. Global CB and global CB index did not show significant differences between every two set points during lengthening procedures (P > 0.05). The percentage of patients with C7PL-CSVL distance more than 20 mm roughly ranged from 30 to 45 % during the lengthening process. With regards to regional CB and main curve Cobb angles, there were significant differences between every two adjacent set points during the first five lengthening surgeries (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Global CB did not significantly change during serial lengthening surgeries and C7PL-CSVL distances of greater than 20 mm comprised of over one third of patients during growing rod treatment. However, worsening regional CB and Cobb angles of the main curve during lengthening intervals were corrected by lengthening manipulation and maintained at a stable level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronal balance; Early onset scoliosis; Growing rod; Lengthening surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27072316      PMCID: PMC4830065          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1007-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


Background

The goal of surgical correction of scoliosis is to achieve a solid spinal fusion in a balanced position in both coronal and sagittal planes. Gaining and maintaining spinal balance after surgery is of great importance as apparent trunk deformity significantly correlates with patients’ quality of life [1-3]. Growing rod surgery was developed to treat early onset scoliosis (EOS) with the goals of obtaining and maintaining deformity correction, achieving adequate spinal growth and allowing sufficient thoracic development [4]. Previous studies had evaluated the effect of growing rod surgery on curve correction, spinal growth as well as thoracic or lung growth [5-19]. Several studies have also evaluated the effect of growing rod treatment on the sagittal profile [20-22]. However, to our knowledge, tendency of trunk balance on the coronal plane during growing rod lengthening surgery has not been studied before. After growing rod insertion surgery, repeated lengthening surgeries were carried out, which would last for several years. Flynn et al. [23] studied 99 patients who completed lengthening and found that the mean duration of growing rod treatment was 5 years. Coronal profile would influence patients’ quality of life not only after final fusion but also during serial lengthening surgeries. During serial lengthening procedures, long term coronal imbalance would probably influence EOS patients’ quality of life. Therefore we retrospectively reviewed the radiographic data of EOS patients treated with growing rod in our hospital and conducted this study to evaluate the effect of consecutive growing rod lengthening on coronal balance (CB).

Methods

Patients

All EOS patients treated with growing rods in our hospital from August 2002 to June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent at least one lengthening surgery were included. Patients with kyphoscoliosis were excluded. Since very few patients underwent more than five lengthenings, radiographic data up to and including the fifth lengthening surgery were reviewed. If the radiographic parameters could not be measured due to technical inadequacy of the plain film, measurements and outcomes for that specific radiograph were excluded from our study. In addition, if patients underwent final fusion surgeries before the fifth lengthening surgery, radiographs after the final surgery were not measured. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. And written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Radiographic measurements

The upright posteroanterior images before and after growing rod insertion surgery and the first five lengthening surgeries were measured, including global CB, regional CB, Cobb angle of the main curve and pelvic inlet width (PIW). Global CB was measured in millimeters as the perpendicular distance between the C7 plumbline and the central sacral vertical line (C7PL–CSVL). Regional CB was defined as the perpendicular distance between the midpoint of the apex vertebrae of the main curve and CSVL (AV-CSVL). PIW was measured at the maximal width across the inner margin of the left and right iliac bones [24] (Fig. 1). PIW is an age-independent parameter, which can be used as an individualized internal standard of growth [25]. Thus, global CB index and regional CB index were calculated as dividing global CB and dividing regional CB by PIW, respectively.
Fig. 1

Measurements of global coronal balance, regional coronal balance and pelvic inlet width

Measurements of global coronal balance, regional coronal balance and pelvic inlet width Measurements were performed by two of authors independently using Surgimap version 1.2.1.86 (Nemaris Inc, New York, NY, USA). All the radiographs were calibrated to achieve accurate distance measurements. The alignments of all stitched films were carefully checked.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Comparisons of global CB, regional CB, Cobb angle of the main curve, global CB index and regional CB index at adjacent set points were performed using covariance analysis. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 67 patients, including 21 males and 46 females were included in this study. The mean age at initial growing rod insertion surgeries was 7.3 ± 2.9 years (range from 2 to 13 years). And the mean duration of growing rod treatment was 2.8 ± 1.5 years (range from 0.5 to 6 years). An average of 3.4 lengthening procedures per patient with an average interval of 0.8 years was performed. Of the 67 patients, 59 underwent dual growing rod surgery and 8 received single growing rod treatment. In terms of etiology, 52 patients were congenital (77.6 %), 4 patients were idiopathic (5.9 %), 3 patients had an underlying neuromuscular condition (4.4 %), 5 patients had neurofibromatosis(7.5 %) and 3 patients had syndromic scoliosis (4.4 %). 570 Radiographs were available for measurement, including 134 images before and after growing rod insertion surgeries and 436 images pre- and post-lengthening surgeries. The number of patients that underwent initial growing rod insertion and each subsequent lengthening is illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Numbers of patients that underwent initial growing rod insertion and each subsequent lengthening “0” indicates growing rod insertion surgery and “1-5” indicate the first to the fifth lengthening surgery respectively

Numbers of patients that underwent initial growing rod insertion and each subsequent lengthening “0” indicates growing rod insertion surgery and “1-5” indicate the first to the fifth lengthening surgery respectively The mean preoperative global CB of the 67 patients was 21.3 ± 17.7 mm, and C7PL-CSVL distances were greater than 20 mm in 30 patients (44.7 %) (Fig. 3) After growing rod insertion surgery, the mean global CB changed to 17.1 ± 15.2 mm, which showed significant differences (P = 0.0382, Table 1). The percentage of C7PL-CSVL distance greater than 20 mm also fell to 32.8 % (22/67). However, during lengthening procedures, global CB did not show significant differences between every two set points (P > 0.05; Table 1, Fig. 4a). The percentage of patients with C7PL-CSVL distance >20 mm also showed no regularity, approximately ranging from 30 to 45 % (Fig. 3). When normalized by PIW, global CB index did not show statistical difference both between measurements of initial surgery and between lengthening surgeries (P > 0.05; Table 1, Fig. 4d).
Fig. 3

Percentage of patients with C7PL-CSVL distance greater than 20 mm during growing rod treatment

Table 1

Comparison of CB during serial growing rod lengthening procedures in EOS patients 

Comparison P value
Global CBRegional CBCobb angleGlobal CB indexRegional CB index
Pre-op vs. post-op 0.0382 <.0001 <.0001 0.0361 <.0001
Post-op vs. pre-1st-L0.2732 <.0001 <.0001 0.5564 <.0001
Pre-1st-L vs. post-1st-L0.5651 0.0004 <.0001 0.5237 <.0001
Post-1st-L vs. pre-2nd-L0.1694 0.0268 <.0001 0.16530.1291
Pre-2nd-L vs. post-2nd-L0.0762 0.0080 <.0001 0.0579 0.0119
Post-2nd-L vs. pre-3rd-L0.2604 0.0025 <.0001 0.4004 0.0162
Pre-3rd-L vs. post-3rd-L0.8247 0.0006 <.0001 0.9603 0.0005
Post-3rd-L vs. pre-4th-L0.7842 0.0101 <.0001 0.78100.0886
Pre-4th-L vs. post-4th-L0.30010.1113 0.0003 0.26410.1171
Post-4th-L vs. pre-5th-L0.5719 0.0134 0.0002 0.69890.0565
Pre-5th-L vs. post-5th-L0.3782 0.0362 0.0008 0.38250.0679

Bold numbers were considered statistically significant (P > 0.05)

Fig. 4

Changes in CB of initial surgeries and consecutive lengthening surgeries in EOS patients

Percentage of patients with C7PL-CSVL distance greater than 20 mm during growing rod treatment Comparison of CB during serial growing rod lengthening procedures in EOS patients Bold numbers were considered statistically significant (P > 0.05) Changes in CB of initial surgeries and consecutive lengthening surgeries in EOS patients With regards to regional CB, there were significant differences between every two adjacent set points of initial surgeries and the first five lengthening surgeries, which was more obvious before and after initial surgeries with the mean AV-CSVL distance changing from 64.5 ± 30.5 mm to 29.4 ± 22.2 mm (P < 0.05; Table 1, Fig. 4b). However, they fluctuated at a certain range during the following lengthening surgeries, which illustrated as a wavy curve in Fig. 4b. Regional CB index also showed significant differences before and after initial growing rod insertion surgeries, after initial surgeries and before first lengthening as well as before and after first lengthening (P < 0.05; Table 1, Fig. 4e). Although the wavy curve changes still existed during subsequent lengthening surgeries, no statistical difference was observed (P > 0.05; Table 1, Fig. 4e). The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the main curve was 72.3° ± 20.9°, ranging from 32°to 135°, which was corrected to an average of 37.2° ± 13.6° after initial surgeries (P < 0.05). Then a wavy change was also observed during the following lengthening surgeries, which manifested an increase during lengthening intervals and a decrease after lengthening manipulations (Table 1, Fig. 4c). Twenty implant-related complications occurred in 12 out of 67 patients, including 7 hook dislodgements, 7 screw pullouts and 6 rod breakages. All these complications were corrected during subsequent planned elective lengthening procedures. No patients experienced wound infection or other medical complications.

Discussion

Other than deformity correction and maintaining spinal and thoracic growth, CB of EOS patients is also an important aspect during growing rod treatment. Normally this problem can be easily ignored, considering CB during lengthening surgeries is temporary and does not represent the final result. However, the whole growing rod treatment usually lasts for many years [6, 23]. Coronal imbalance during this long period would probably influence EOS patients’ quality of life [26]. In this study, through analyzing the radiographic data of 67 EOS patients treated by growing rod technique, we found that global CB was maintained during serial lengthening procedures whereas worsened regional CB during lengthening intervals was corrected by lengthening manipulations. Global CB, defined as C7PL-CSVL distance, was affected by several factors, including compensative changes of uninvolved segments cephalad to the upper instrumented vertebrae and caudad to the lower instrumented vertebrae, aggravating tendencies of the main curve due to the Hueter-Volkmann law and inherent etiologies, restriction of involved segments by growing rod constructs, and regular lengthening manipulations [27]. Although C7PL-CSVL distance significantly decreased immediately after growing rod insertion surgery,the overall effect of these aforementioned factors ensured that global CB was generally stable throughout serial lengthening procedures in our study. Normally, global coronal imbalance is defined as C7PL-CSVL distance greater than 20 mm in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [3, 28, 29]. Using this definition, we might underestimate coronal imbalance in EOS patients considering their smaller size than in adolescents. Nevertheless, the percentage of C7PL-CSVL distance greater than 20 mm was also analyzed. It turned out comparatively, there were a greater proportion of patients with C7PL-CSVL distance more than 20 mm during growing rod treatment, and the effect of growing rod manipulation on global CB during repeated lengthenings was very limited. However, we speculated that global CB would probably improve after final fusion surgery [30]. Regional CB, defined by AV-CSVL distance in this study, was also affected by similar factors as global CB, except compensative changes of uninvolved segments that were cephalad to the upper instrumented vertebrae. We hypothesized that worsening of the main curve during lengthening intervals might play a vital role, because in this study we found that regional CB was aggravated during lengthening intervals and growing rod lengthening manipulation significantly reversed it. However, regional CB index did not show statistical difference between every two set point measurements after the first lengthening surgeries. Thus, spinal growth might also have some effects on regional CB, which should be studied further in the future. As expected, Cobb angle of the main curve was increased during lengthening intervals because of aggravating tendencies of the curve itself and restriction of growing rod constructs. Lengthening manipulations reversed the deterioration and maintained it in a stable level. There were some limitations in this study. First, the enrolled patients have different etiologies with varying magnitude of the main curve Cobb angle (ranging from 32° to 135°), which might influence the statistical results of change tendencies of global CB and regional CB during consecutive lengthening procedures. In addition, only the first five lengthening radiographic data was analyzed due to the small number of patients that received more than five lengthening surgeries [19]. However, we could still analyze the effect of growing rod treatment on CB during subsequent lengthenings based on the findings of this study. Finally, complications, especially implant-related complications, could also affect global and regional CB. We did not exclude these patients or the specific surgeries, thus the results of this study reflected the overall effect of growing rod treatment on CB, and not just lengthening manipulations.

Conclusions

In conclusion, through analyzing 570 radiographic data of 67 EOS patients treated with growing rod technique, we found that global CB did not significantly change during serial lengthening surgeries and approximately 30–45 % patients had C7PL-CSVL distance greater than 20 mm. Regional CB and Cobb angle of the main curve worsened during lengthening intervals, both of which were corrected by lengthening manipulation and thereby maintained at a stable level.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. And written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available on request to the corresponding author.
  30 in total

1.  Lung function after growing rod surgery for progressive early-onset scoliosis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yu Jiang; Yu Zhao; Yi-Peng Wang; Gui-Xing Qiu; Xi-Sheng Weng; Ye Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Prediction of thoracic dimensions and spine length based on individual pelvic dimensions in children and adolescents: an age-independent, individualized standard for evaluation of outcome in early onset spinal deformity.

Authors:  John B Emans; Michelle Ciarlo; Michael Callahan; David Zurakowski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Dual growing rod treatment in early onset scoliosis: the effect of repeated lengthening surgeries on thoracic growth and dimensions.

Authors:  Zhi-jian Sun; Gui-xing Qiu; Yu Zhao; Shi-gong Guo; Jian-guo Zhang; Jian-xiong Shen; Yi-Peng Wang; Hong Zhao; Shu-gang Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of initial efficacy between single and dual growing rods in treatment of early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Yu Zhao; Gui-Xing Qiu; Yi-Peng Wang; Jian-Guo Zhang; Jian-Xiong Shen; Shu-Gang Li; Hong Zhao; Yu Jiang; Ye Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Behrooz A Akbarnia; David S Marks; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Alistair G Thompson; Marc A Asher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effect of serial growing rod lengthening on the sagittal profile and pelvic parameters in early-onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Suken A Shah; Ali F Karatas; Arjun A Dhawale; Ozgur Dede; Gregory M Mundis; Laurens Holmes; Petya Yorgova; Geraldine Neiss; Charles E Johnston; John B Emans; George H Thompson; Jeff B Pawelek; Behrooz A Akbarnia
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Three-dimensional stereoradiographic modeling of rib cage before and after spinal growing rod procedures in early-onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Marc Sabourin; Erwan Jolivet; Lotfi Miladi; Philippe Wicart; Virginie Rampal; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Growth-sparing spinal instrumentation in skeletal dysplasia.

Authors:  Ali F Karatas; Ozgur Dede; Kenneth Rogers; Colleen P Ditro; Laurens Holmes; Michael Bober; Suken A Shah; William G Mackenzie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Early onset scoliosis: modern treatment and results.

Authors:  John E Tis; Lawrence I Karlin; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Laurel C Blakemore; George H Thompson; Richard E McCarthy; Carlos A Tello; Michael J Mendelow; Edward P Southern
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2012 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection for selective posterior fusion of moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis: lower-end vertebra or lower-end vertebra+1?

Authors:  Zhijian Sun; Guixing Qiu; Yu Zhao; Yipeng Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of the Effects of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod and Tradiotinal Growing Rod Techniques on the Sagittal Plane in the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis.

Authors:  Sinan Erdoğan; Barış Polat; Yunus Atıcı; Osman Nuri Özyalvaç; Çağatay Öztürk
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2019-08-30

2.  Coronal and sagittal spinopelvic alignment in the patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip: a prospective study.

Authors:  Guangyang Zhang; Mufan Li; Hang Qian; Xu Wang; Xiaoqian Dang; Ruiyu Liu
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.