BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (METH), an abused illicit drug, disrupts many cellular processes, including energy metabolism, spermatogenesis, and maintenance of oxidative status. However, many components of the molecular underpinnings of METH toxicity have yet to be established. Network analyses of integrated proteomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic data are particularly well suited for identifying cellular responses to toxins, such as METH, which might otherwise be obscured by the numerous and dynamic changes that are induced. METHODOLOGY/ RESULTS: We used network analyses of proteomic and transcriptomic data to evaluate pathways in Drosophila melanogaster that are affected by acute METH toxicity. METH exposure caused changes in the expression of genes involved with energy metabolism, suggesting a Warburg-like effect (aerobic glycolysis), which is normally associated with cancerous cells. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that carbohydrate metabolism plays an important role in METH toxicity. In agreement with our hypothesis, we observed that increased dietary sugars partially alleviated the toxic effects of METH. Our systems analysis also showed that METH impacted genes and proteins known to be associated with muscular homeostasis/contraction, maintenance of oxidative status, oxidative phosphorylation, spermatogenesis, iron and calcium homeostasis. Our results also provide numerous candidate genes for the METH-induced dysfunction of spermatogenesis, which have not been previously characterized at the molecular level. CONCLUSION: Our results support our overall hypothesis that METH causes a toxic syndrome that is characterized by the altered carbohydrate metabolism, dysregulation of calcium and iron homeostasis, increased oxidative stress, and disruption of mitochondrial functions.
BACKGROUND:Methamphetamine (METH), an abused illicit drug, disrupts many cellular processes, including energy metabolism, spermatogenesis, and maintenance of oxidative status. However, many components of the molecular underpinnings of METHtoxicity have yet to be established. Network analyses of integrated proteomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic data are particularly well suited for identifying cellular responses to toxins, such as METH, which might otherwise be obscured by the numerous and dynamic changes that are induced. METHODOLOGY/ RESULTS: We used network analyses of proteomic and transcriptomic data to evaluate pathways in Drosophila melanogaster that are affected by acute METHtoxicity. METH exposure caused changes in the expression of genes involved with energy metabolism, suggesting a Warburg-like effect (aerobic glycolysis), which is normally associated with cancerous cells. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that carbohydrate metabolism plays an important role in METHtoxicity. In agreement with our hypothesis, we observed that increased dietary sugars partially alleviated the toxic effects of METH. Our systems analysis also showed that METH impacted genes and proteins known to be associated with muscular homeostasis/contraction, maintenance of oxidative status, oxidative phosphorylation, spermatogenesis, iron and calcium homeostasis. Our results also provide numerous candidate genes for the METH-induced dysfunction of spermatogenesis, which have not been previously characterized at the molecular level. CONCLUSION: Our results support our overall hypothesis that METH causes a toxic syndrome that is characterized by the altered carbohydrate metabolism, dysregulation of calcium and iron homeostasis, increased oxidative stress, and disruption of mitochondrial functions.
The term “systems biology” refers to the interdisciplinary study of
complex interactions that give rise to the function and performance of a particular
biological system. Currently, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics are the
principal technology platforms that provide useful data for systems biology
analyses. Data from these various platforms are integrated to reveal how cellular
systems respond to xenobiotics like plant defense compounds, food ingredients [1], [2], pesticides, and
drugs, thereby providing insights into how animals are affected by xenobiotic
challenges and possible ways to alleviate their negative biological effects.When used in combination with model organisms, xenobiotic challenges also provide an
opportunity to test analytical approaches based on systems biology. For example,
METH is a central nervous system stimulant that is increasingly abused, especially
by teenagers and young adults, and that causes acute and chronic side effects in
multiple organ systems [1], [2]. However, most molecular studies on the impact of METH
have focused on brain tissues [3], [4], [5], including recent work by Chin et al
[6] using combined
proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. However, to our knowledge, there are no
systems biology analyses of the impact of METH on whole organisms. In terms of a
model organism, Drosophila melanogaster has one of the best-defined
genomes among insects [7] and a robust set of available mutants, making it an
excellent system with which to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the genomic,
proteomic, and metabolomic whole-organism responses to xenobiotics and to obtain
follow-up validation through mutant analysis. Moreover, METH influences
evolutionarily conserved pathways shared by Drosophila and mammals
(e.g., oxidative phosphorylation). Importantly, xenobiotic
perturbations of conserved molecular pathways have the potential to generate similar
cellular- and organism-level responses across species.Here we report that the administration of METH to Drosophila causes
a METH-induced cytotoxic syndrome. Consumption of this drug has been associated with
several disorders in humans and in animal models, including defects in the male
reproductive system, changes in blood sugar levels, induction of oxidative stress,
neurological damage, heart disease, reduction of mitochondrial energy production,
increased lactic acid build up, and apoptosis in multiple tissues [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. METH syndrome
produces changes in cellular energy metabolism that appear to be consistent with a
Warburg effect, which is characterized by high levels of glycolysis (followed by
lactic acid fermentation) and decreased oxidative phosphorylation in the
mitochondria, even under aerobic conditions [16], [17]. These metabolic changes, however,
could also be consistent with hypoxia. The Warburg effect has not previously been
associated with METH syndrome.Using a systems biology approach, we present a mechanism-based model to describe the
molecular impacts of METH on cellular pathways, followed by a mutant analysis of key
METH-responsive genes including those with known and previously unknown function. We
also determined that dietary trehalose reduced METHtoxicity in
Drosophila. Trehalose is an antioxidant and the major blood
sugar in insects [18], [19]. Combined results from systems biology and mutant
analyses have the potential to give us an in-depth understanding of the impact of
xenobiotics on cellular and organismal systems.
Results and Discussion
Systems biology elucidates complementary aspects of the METH syndrome
Gene pathways detected by microarray
To elucidate potential pathways responsive to METH, we analyzed microarray
data, comparing control and METH-treated Drosophila males
through Gene Ontology (GO) system categorizations (http://www.geneontology.org) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of
Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/). Genes with a
p value smaller than 0.008 and an absolute fold change
greater than 1.5 were considered significant and used for the analyses. The
top eight pathways were (i–v) detoxification/drug metabolism pathways,
(vi) glutathione metabolism, (vii) glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and (viii)
purine metabolism (Table S1). In total, we observed 229
differentially transcribed genes and 34 potential pathways, some of which
are consistent with METH syndrome (e.g., energy-associated
pathways) and known specific responses to METH (such as tyrosine
metabolism); METH is known to lead to long-term decreases in the activity of
dopamine transporter and tyrosine hydroxylase [20].
Proteomic analysis
Initially, we identified 226 spectral peaks that were differentially
expressed after METH treatment (p<0.05 and a fold-change
of >2). We were able to identify the associated peptides for 87 of the
original 226 peaks (SpectrumMill peptide score of >6 and SPI%
>60%) (Table S2). Because multiple peptides were
observed for a single protein, only 72 proteins were identified: 33
increased in abundance, 35 decreased, and 4 proteins (CG4169-PA; ATP
synthase- CG11154-PA, isoform A; enolase CG17654-PE, isoform E; and, MyHC)
(Table
S2) had associated peptides that were for unknown reasons both
increased and decreased (they were probably associated with different
isoforms of the same protein). The 72 differentially expressed proteins were
then categorized according to their involvement in 26 pathways, including
those relating to heart and skeletal muscles, oxidative stress, energy,
oxidative phosphorylation, and spermatogenesis. All 26 pathways are known to
be associated with METH responses in mammals (Table
S2).
Impact of METH on combined transcriptome and proteome pathways
The database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery (DAVID)
analysis indicated that a large number of differentially expressed proteins
were involved in glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 1; Figure
S1 and Table S3). Because only one common
protein/gene, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH), was present in both
the proteomic and gene expression data in the METH-treated flies, we
performed multiple pathway analyses in which these two “omic”
data sets were combined. Although each of these analyses revealed somewhat
different pathways, all the pathways identified were consistent with METH
syndrome (Figures S2 & S3). A process network analysis of the
proteomic and microarray data revealed that of the top 10 networks impacted
by METH, 8 were associated with skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle,
cytoskeleton systems, and oxidative stress (Figure
S2). Statistically significant test results for genes or proteins
enriched in pathways performed with DAVID software were obtained for several
pathways related to changes in both the microarray and proteomics
experiments (Figure S3). These pathways include glycolysis, oxidative
phosphorylation, hormonal pathways and cytoskeletal remodeling.
Figure 1
Changes in abundance of key proteins associated with oxidative
phosphorylation.
METH exposure results in changes in the abundance of key proteins in
the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC), including
complexes I, III and V. The direction of the red arrow indicates
specific proteins that either increased (up) or decreased (down) in
abundance as a result of METH exposure. Protein expression data is
also given in Table S2. The figure for ETC was
adapted from http://www.genome.jp/kegg-bin/highlight_pathway?scale=1.0&map=map00190&keyword=oxidative.
Changes in abundance of key proteins associated with oxidative
phosphorylation.
METH exposure results in changes in the abundance of key proteins in
the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC), including
complexes I, III and V. The direction of the red arrow indicates
specific proteins that either increased (up) or decreased (down) in
abundance as a result of METH exposure. Protein expression data is
also given in Table S2. The figure for ETC was
adapted from http://www.genome.jp/kegg-bin/highlight_pathway?scale=1.0&map=map00190&keyword=oxidative.
Biological relevance of pathways associated with METH syndrome
The pathways that we observed in our transcriptomic and proteomic analyses are
consistent with the known effects of METH on biological systems, including
proteases, detoxification enzymes, oxidative stress and iron homeostasis (See
Text
S1). However, because we analyzed whole-organisms, as compared to
previous studies on brain tissue [3], [4], [5], we observed proteins that
had not been previously associated with METH-induced responses, including
certain proteins involved in the electron transport chain, muscle
formation/homeostasis, and spermatogenesis.
Mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC)
METH has been previously shown to affect the mitochondrial electron transport
chain (ETC) [21]. We observed changes in the abundance of proteins
associated with the ETC, corroborating the work of others who have observed that
METH inhibits the ETC in mice and rats [9], [22]; Burrows and co-workers
observed the inhibition of cytochrome oxidase activity [9] (complex IV of the ETC) in
rat brains after METH treatment, and Brown et al.
[23] observed
that succinate dehydrogenase (complex II of the ETC) was inhibited by METH in
the striatum of rats. We observed changes in the prevalence of multiple proteins
in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway beyond complex II and IV (Figure S3),
including those associated with complex I (phosphoglycerate mutase
[pglym78] and NADH dehydrogenase
[ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 10
[ND42)]), complex III (CG3815 with
ubiquinol-cytochrome-c reductase activity), and complex V (ATP synthase subunit
alpha [also known as bellwether in
Drosophila]) of the ETC (Figure 1). Alaux et al.
observed that aggression in bees is associated with reduced enzyme activity for
complexes I (NADH dehydrogenase), IV (cytochrome c oxidase), and V (ATP
synthase) [24]
(Table
S2). Whether METH-induced aggressive behavior is associated with the
oxidative phosphorylation pathway has not been determined.
Proteins related to muscle and heart disease
METH causes muscle loss [25], [26] and heart failure in humans [27], however, little is
known about the molecular mechanisms by which METH causes this effect. In
Drosophila, we observed that the concentrations of
numerous muscle-associated proteins changed in response to METH exposure.
For example, dynein heavy chain and troponin c decreased 6- and 2-fold,
respectively, and tropomyosin protein levels increased 10-fold (Table
S2). Additionally, we observed that three MyHC peptides increased
approximately 10-fold (Table S2) and two other MyHC peptides
decreased 8-fold with METH treatment, suggesting that METH likely disrupts
normal muscle physiology in Drosophila. This is supported
by the observation that changes in the relative mRNA expression of alpha -
and beta-myosin heavy chain (MyHC) are associated with chronic heart failure
in humans [28].
Spermatogenesis- and ejaculation-related proteins
METH causes sexual dysfunction in mammals, inhibiting sperm motility [29], and
amphetamines, which are structurally similar to METH, retard ejaculation in
humans [30]. Although METH is known to have negative effects
on male fertility [29] little is known regarding the molecular impacts
of METH on spermatogenesis. In our study, we detected seven METH-responsive
genes and proteins that are associated with reproductive functions in males
(Tables
S2 & S3), some of which are evolutionarily conserved in
humans.The transcript of CG11893, which was up-regulated in
METH-treated flies, is associated with the Androcam gene;
this gene encodes a protein abundantly expressed in the cones of the testes
in Drosophila
[31]. The
C-domain of Androcam binds calcium and has 67%
homology with a mammalian calmodulin [32] protein that has
testes-specific calcium signaling functions [31].
CG11893, which is associated with poe,
has protein-binding functions (UniProtKB).The protein CG32542, which is over-expressed in METH-treated flies, interacts
with ocn (iHOP- http://www.ihop-net.org/) [33], a testes-specific
gene [34].
The protein CG3815 was under-expressed in METH-treated flies and interacts
with sneaky, a testes-expressed gene involved in sperm
exocytosis in Drosophila
[35].
Fertilization typically involves membrane fusion between sperm and eggs. In
Drosophila, however, sperm enter eggs with membranes
intact, and the membranes are broken down in the egg; only then are the
sperm activated. Mutations in sneaky can impair this
process, resulting in male sterility due to impaired sperm plasma membrane
breakdown [35]. Sneaky-like genes have also
been detected in humans [35].Tubulins also have an important function in spermatogenesis [36]. We
observed that the alpha-tubulin 84B protein, a component of the spermatozoa
cytoskeleton involved in spermatid development [37], decreased in
METH-treated flies. Two mitochondrial proteins—porin, which decreased,
and bellwether, which increased—were identified in
flies exposed to METH. Porin is localized in the outer mitochondrial
membrane of germ cells in the testes and in the spermatozoa in
Drosophila
[38].
The mitochondrial ATP synthase subunit alpha of complex V
(bellwether) is also involved in spermatogenesis and is
associated with male sterility [39]. In addition, the
expression of the predominant ejaculatory bulb protein (PEB-me), a component
of the mating plug in Drosophila
[40],
[41],
increased 10-fold in response to METH treatment (Table
S2). Moreover, the germ cell nuclear-like factor (GCNF) was
identified in METH-treated flies; this potential transcription factor
binding motif (TFBM) is associated with germ cells (Figure
S4, S5, S6,
Text
S1, Table S4 and Table
S5). GCNF targets several genes involved in sperm maturation.
Metabolomic profiling and dietary trehalose
Previous studies in mammals have shown that METHtoxicity is interrelated with
metabolism in the brain and sugar levels in the blood [3], [4], [5], [42], [43]. Thus, we also investigated
changes in whole organism sugar levels in Drosophila in
response to METH. Using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), we
observed decreased trehalose levels in METH-exposed Drosophila
(p<0.0001; Figure S7). That trehalose acts as an
antioxidant [18], [44], and thus is itself oxidized, could account for
reduced trehalose levels. Because trehalose is the major blood sugar in insects,
decreased levels of trehalose could also reflect either higher metabolic rates
resulting from a METH-induced increase in physical activity or increased
carbohydrate consumption resulting from increased glycolysis.We found that METH-treated flies fed a diet containing trehalose or sucrose lived
longer than flies treated only with METH (p<0.01 and
p<0.05, respectively; Table 1). In contrast, sorbitol, a sugar
alcohol that is not well metabolized by Drosophila
[45], had no
impact on METHtoxicity. These results suggest that METH-toxicity is
interrelated with carbohydrate metabolism, corroborating previous findings where
it has also been observed that supplementation with cofactors of energy
metabolism attenuates the toxicity of METH [8], [46]. Interestingly, humanMETH
addicts often imbibe large amounts of sugary soft drinks [47]; such dietary studies in
Drosophila lead us to question whether sugar intake in
humans helps to alleviate the toxic effects of METH.
Table 1
The lethal time 50 (LT50) and 95% confidence
interval (C.I.) of Drosophila melanogaster fed on
methamphetamine (METH), and different sugars (including trehalose,
sucrose, and sorbitol) plus METH.
Treatment
LT50 (h)
95% C. I. (h)
P value*
METH 0.6%
50.40
45.19–55.58
–
Trehalose 0.189M+METH 0.6%
91.99
80.31–112.04
<0.01
Sucrose 0.189M+METH 0.6%
71.88
67.34–77.03
<0.05
Sorbitol 0.189M+METH 0.6%
62.68
56.74–69.01
N.S.
*Comparisons were between the LT50s of the given sugar
plus METH treatment versus the METH only treatment. N.S. stands for
not significant. The LT50s and treatment comparisons were
performed using SAS (Cary, NC).
*Comparisons were between the LT50s of the given sugar
plus METH treatment versus the METH only treatment. N.S. stands for
not significant. The LT50s and treatment comparisons were
performed using SAS (Cary, NC).
Oxidative stress
We observed multiple genes and proteins associated with an oxidative stress in
METH-treated Drosophila; METH also induces oxidative stress in
mammals [6].
Oxidative stress has been linked to many pathways, including alcohol
dehydrogenase (ADH) activity [48], actin reorganization [49], and the inhibition of
hexokinase activity in rabbit erythrocytes [50]. Aconitase also helps to
regulate resistance to oxidative stress and cell death in two plant species,
Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana
benthamiana
[51].
Consistent with the hypothesis that the METH-treated flies are experiencing
oxidative stress, we observed decreases in alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and
aconitase, as well as increases in hexokinase and actin (Table
S2).Oxidative stress also causes thiol oxidation in the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH) of Staphylococcus aureus
[52] and
increases GAPDH transcript levels in rabbit aortas [53]. Perhaps because of the
oxidative stress involved in exposure to METH, we observed a 10-fold increase in
GAPDH in the treated flies (Table S2). GAPDH belongs to an evolutionarily
conserved protein family, the aldehyde dehydrogenases; these play a key role in
stress responses, including oxidative stress [54], [55].Our data also suggest that METH induces multiple pathways associated with the
generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Figure 2). Flies challenged with METH
differentially expressed multiple genes and exhibited changed protein levels
associated with the mitochondrial ETC, potentially leading to ROS formation.
High levels of P450s, which we observed in METH-treated
Drosophila, in some cases can also lead to the generation
of ROS during detoxification and catabolism, which can cause downstream ROS
formation. For example, the degradation of the endoplasmic reticulum [56], the main
Ca2+ storage areas of the cell, disrupts
Ca2+ homeostasis [57]. Dysregulation of
Ca2+ homeostasis can lead to cell death, especially under
conditions of oxidative stress, because high levels of cytoplasmic
Ca2+ can cause the formation of nonspecific pores, known as
permeability transition pores, in the inner mitochondrial membrane. These pores
may cause the mitochondria to swell massively, depolarize, and generate ROS,
leading to cell death [58]. Additionally, the tumor suppressor p53 protein is
induced by ROS, leading to apoptosis following treatment with METH [59], [60], [61].
Figure 2
Changes in energy metabolism and apoptosis in response to METH
treatment.
In METH metabolic syndrome, key glycolytic enzymes
[i.e., HK (hexokinase), ALD (aldolase), GAPDH
(glyceraldehydes 3-phosphate dehydrogenase), and ENO (enolase)] are
up-regulated (upward-pointing red arrows), presumably leading to higher
glycolytic flux. PYK (pyruvate kinase), however, was down-regulated
(downward-pointing red arrow), diverting pyruvate away from oxidative
respiration towards fermentation to lactic acid. Mitochondrial
degradation (see Figure
3 for detailed discussion) and dysregulation of the electron
transport chain (see Figure
1) may also contribute to decreased oxidative respiration.
Hsp60 binds to BAX, preventing apoptosis. Thus, the down-regulation of
Hsp60 observed with METH exposure may potentially increase free BAX,
leading to apoptosis. Multiple genes known to transcriptionally regulate
glycolysis and/or apoptosis were differentially regulated during METH
exposure, including (i) AKT and PI3K, which were up-regulated, enhancing
glycolysis and carbohydrate transport across the cellular membrane, and
(ii) iron chelators (Fe-Ch), which were down-regulated and are known to
interact with HF1a (genes not detected experimentally, indicated by
dashed lines). In addition, ENO1 and YY1, which suppress and activate,
respectively, the transcription of c-Myc, were both up-regulated,
suggesting a loss of fine control over c-Myc. c-Myc in turn regulates
the transcription of many other genes including those involved in
apoptosis and glycolysis.
Changes in energy metabolism and apoptosis in response to METH
treatment.
In METHmetabolic syndrome, key glycolytic enzymes
[i.e., HK (hexokinase), ALD (aldolase), GAPDH
(glyceraldehydes 3-phosphate dehydrogenase), and ENO (enolase)] are
up-regulated (upward-pointing red arrows), presumably leading to higher
glycolytic flux. PYK (pyruvate kinase), however, was down-regulated
(downward-pointing red arrow), diverting pyruvate away from oxidative
respiration towards fermentation to lactic acid. Mitochondrial
degradation (see Figure
3 for detailed discussion) and dysregulation of the electron
transport chain (see Figure
1) may also contribute to decreased oxidative respiration.
Hsp60 binds to BAX, preventing apoptosis. Thus, the down-regulation of
Hsp60 observed with METH exposure may potentially increase free BAX,
leading to apoptosis. Multiple genes known to transcriptionally regulate
glycolysis and/or apoptosis were differentially regulated during METH
exposure, including (i) AKT and PI3K, which were up-regulated, enhancing
glycolysis and carbohydrate transport across the cellular membrane, and
(ii) iron chelators (Fe-Ch), which were down-regulated and are known to
interact with HF1a (genes not detected experimentally, indicated by
dashed lines). In addition, ENO1 and YY1, which suppress and activate,
respectively, the transcription of c-Myc, were both up-regulated,
suggesting a loss of fine control over c-Myc. c-Myc in turn regulates
the transcription of many other genes including those involved in
apoptosis and glycolysis.
Figure 3
METH exposure may promote oxidative stress through multiple
mechanisms.
First, cytochrome P450s are up-regulated (upward-pointing red arrow) to
potentially detoxify METH but in some cases also produce reactive oxygen
species (ROS) byproducts. Second, METH, a weak base, is known to
alkalinize dopamine (DA)-containing vesicles, promoting DA release into
the cytosol. Cytosolic DA is rapidly degraded, resulting in ROS
byproducts. Third, iron chelators are down-regulated (downward-pointed
red arrow), potentially increasing the concentration of free iron, a
known source of ROS. Fourth, degradation of the mitochondria,
potentially resulting from (i) the ability of high cytosolic
Ca2+ to promote the formation of permeability
transition pores (PTP), (ii) increased membrane hydrolysis by
Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A2 (PLA2) in
the presence of increased Ca2+, (iii) the direct effects
of ROS on mitochondrial integrity, and (iv) the potential effects of
altered HK/porin ratio - HK detachment from mitochondria on PTP
formation. This may cause the mitochondria to uncouple and result in ROS
production. The cellular targets of oxidative stress, indicated by
orange arrows, include membrane phospholipids; p53, a gene that
regulates apoptosis; and DNA.
ROS react with and cause damage to cellular macromolecules, including DNA and
membrane phospholipids. For example, ROS can chemically modify and fragment DNA
[62],
potentially leading to genetic mutations. Helicases play a central role in
repairing DNA damage caused by UV-light and ROS. These proteins also reverse the
DNA damage associated with replication errors and thus help maintain genomic
stability. Our observation that one helicase was down-regulated (Table S2)
is consistent with the hypothesis that METH causes oxidative DNA damage [63].For membrane phospholipids, ROS cause lipid peroxidation, a process that may
result in the degradation of cellular and mitochondrial membranes. The resulting
change in mitochondrial membrane permeability triggers a signaling cascade that
causes the release of cytochrome c into the cytoplasm, triggering the downstream
caspase-dependent apoptosis [64]. Mitochondrial degradation might contribute to higher
levels of free Ca2+ that can in turn activate phospholipase A,
promoting the hydrolysis of membrane phospholipids, which further disrupts the
cellular compartmentalization of Ca2+. Furthermore, P450 enzyme
systems, which were up-regulated in METH-exposed Drosophila, in
some cases modulate Ca2+ channels that in turn trigger fluxes of
Ca2+
[65]; these
further increase levels of intracellular free Ca2+. An imbalance
in Ca2+ homeostasis due to oxidative stress is also an important
factor in heart disease [66].Iron also plays a role in responses to oxidative stress. Free iron, through the
Fenton reaction, can produce harmful free radicals from hydrogen peroxide [67]. Ferritin,
a major regulator of iron homeostasis [68], chelates iron and prevents
the Fenton reaction. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the
down-regulation of ferritin that we observed with METH-exposure could enhance
the generation of ROS.
Integrating the effects of METH on cellular pathways
METH-treated Drosophila differentially expressed multiple genes,
proteins, and pathways associated with both hypoxia and the Warburg effect
(aerobic glycolysis) [16], [17] (Figure
3). In the mammalian liver, pyruvate kinase is positioned at a key
branch-point in glucose metabolism, and a high expression level of this protein
is correlated with the aerobic status of the cell [69]. This enzyme was
down-regulated in the METH-treated flies, suggesting that METH either induces an
anaerobic response or a Warburg-like effect [70] or some third hitherto
unknown process.
METH exposure may promote oxidative stress through multiple
mechanisms.
First, cytochrome P450s are up-regulated (upward-pointing red arrow) to
potentially detoxify METH but in some cases also produce reactive oxygen
species (ROS) byproducts. Second, METH, a weak base, is known to
alkalinize dopamine (DA)-containing vesicles, promoting DA release into
the cytosol. Cytosolic DA is rapidly degraded, resulting in ROS
byproducts. Third, iron chelators are down-regulated (downward-pointed
red arrow), potentially increasing the concentration of free iron, a
known source of ROS. Fourth, degradation of the mitochondria,
potentially resulting from (i) the ability of high cytosolic
Ca2+ to promote the formation of permeability
transition pores (PTP), (ii) increased membrane hydrolysis by
Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A2 (PLA2) in
the presence of increased Ca2+, (iii) the direct effects
of ROS on mitochondrial integrity, and (iv) the potential effects of
altered HK/porin ratio - HK detachment from mitochondria on PTP
formation. This may cause the mitochondria to uncouple and result in ROS
production. The cellular targets of oxidative stress, indicated by
orange arrows, include membrane phospholipids; p53, a gene that
regulates apoptosis; and DNA.The heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60), primarily a mitochondrial Hsp, is also an
indicator of the aerobic status of the cell and is involved in the apoptotic
response [70],
[71].
Hsp60 is expressed at high levels in normal cells, but hypoxia decreases its
expression and/or changes its cellular distribution [70], causing apoptosis. Indeed,
decreasing the level of Hsp60 in cardiac myocytes was sufficient to cause
apoptosis [71]. Hsp60 forms a macromolecular complex with the
pro-apoptotic protein BAX, which blocks the ability of BAX to translocate to the
mitochondria and to promote apoptosis in vivo
[70]. The
reduced expression of the Hsp60 protein in METH-treated flies, which we
observed, supports the idea that METH induces hypoxia.Levels of the mitochondrial ATP synthase, bellwether, increased
with METH exposure. The over-expression of the subunits of the catalytic core of
the mitochondrial F(0)–F(1) ATP synthase complex,
including the alpha-subunit, are correlated with apoptosis [72]. Up-regulation of these
proteins apparently causes a transient increase in intracellular ATP levels,
which is necessary for apoptosis [72]; pharmacologically inhibiting ATP synthase blocks
apoptosis. Apoptosis is induced in response to a specific signal that indicates
an imbalance between aerobic and anaerobic ATP biosynthesis [69].Several oncogenes have been implicated in the Warburg effect, including the
serine-threonine kinases (AKT) that enhance glucose uptake and aerobic
glycolysis in cancer cells [73] and are able to do so independently of
hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1); the levels of two AKT proteins significantly
changed in the METH-treated flies. AKT mobilizes glucose transporters to the
cell surface to enhance glucose uptake and activates hexokinase (HK) [73], a protein
that was over-expressed in the METH-treated flies. Elstrom and co-workers
reported that through these effects, AKT is able to enhance glycolytic flux
without affecting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, thereby presumably
contributing to the Warburg effect [73]. Moreover, the AKT and
phosphatidylinositol triphosphate kinase (PI3K) protein levels were up-regulated
in METH-treated flies. The PI3K-AKT signaling pathway promotes cell growth,
increases glucose uptake, influences cell cycle progression, and prevents
apoptosis through multiple mechanisms [73].The transcription factor c-Myc, a known oncogene, regulates the cell cycle,
differentiation, apoptosis, metabolism, and cellular responses to oxidative
stress. Typically, the expression of c-Myc is tightly regulated by multiple
transcriptional activators and repressors. In METH-treated
Drosophila, however, multiple genes that regulate c-Myc
were differentially expressed. For instance, YY1 transcription factor, which has
previously been associated molecular responses to oxidative stress and heart
disease [74], [75], activates the transcription of Notch 1 transcription
factor (N1IC) [76]. Subsequently, the N1IC-YY1 complex binds to the
major promoter of the c-Myc gene and activates its expression [76]. In addition,
enolase, which was up-regulated in METH-treated flies, and promoter binding
protein 1 (MBP-1), which results from an alternative translation initiation
codon of the enolase gene, are transcriptional repressors of c-Myc [77]. The
simultaneous up-regulation of transcriptional activators and repressors suggests
that METH disrupts the fine control of c-Myc.Interestingly, c-Myc has been associated with the direct activation of aerobic
glycolysis in humancancers. Numerous METH-responsive glycolytic genes and
proteins detected in our microarray and proteomic analysis are known to interact
with c-Myc (Figure S3). For example, c-Myc activates many glycolytic genes,
including hexokinase (HK) and enolase [78], [79], both of which were
over-expressed in METH-treated flies.Increased glycolytic activity requires increased glucose uptake via glucose
transporter proteins and the increased expression of glycolytic enzymes. METH
treatment induced changes in the flies' expression of glucose transporters,
adolase (Ald), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Table S2).
Ald and GAPDH are associated with the production or elimination of
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate in the process of glycolysis or gluconeogenesis, and
are differentially expressed under many physiological conditions, such as
cancer, hypoxia, and apoptosis [80], [81].The Warburg effect is also associated with other apoptotic pathways, including
one that is induced by voltage-dependent anion channels called porins [82]. Porins
are located in the outer mitochondrial membrane and have been widely implicated
in the initiation of the mitochondria-mediated intrinsic pathway of apoptosis.
Furthermore, porins have been characterized as an important component in the
distribution of mitochondrial membrane cholesterol, which in turn is associated
with aerobic glycolysis [82]. Importantly, porin is a binding partner for HK, a
protein associated with the Warburg effect [82], [83]. The increased affinity
of porin to HK increases cellular access to ATP, which increases use of the
glycolytic pathway. Therefore, the direct binding of HK to porins and the
involvement of porins in cell death suggest that interactions between HK and
porin are a component of apoptosis regulation by HK [83]. In METH treated flies,
porins were under-expressed and HK protein increased more than 10-fold. It is
possible that alterations in the HK-porin relationship influence the apoptotic
pathway. This prediction is supported by a recent report that the
over-expression of HK in human cells suppressed cytochrome c release and
apoptotic cell death [83]. In addition, a single mutation in porin decreased HK
binding, diminishing the protection that HK offers against cell death.
Alternatively, Chiara and co-authors suggested that HK detachment (independent
of porins) from mitochondria induces the PTPs that cause mitochondrial
degradation and apoptosis [84]; furthermore, Shoshan-Barmatz and co-authors observed
that over-expression of HK corresponds to an anti-apoptotic defense mechanism
used by malignant cells [85].Both enolase (which synthesizes phosphoenol pyruvate) and calcium ion homeostasis
are also involved in apoptosis. Some cancers, such as neuroblastoma, have an
associated genomic deletion that corresponds to the enolase gene
(ENO1). When a functional copy of enolase is transfected to
this type of cancer cell, it causes apoptosis [86]. Additionally,
METH-treated flies up-regulated enolase 10-fold. Calcium also has an important
role in signaling pathways associated with cell death and drug resistance [87]. The
cytosolic Ca2+ concentration is controlled by interactions among
transporters, pumps, ion channels, and binding proteins. Consistent with these
observations, METH treatment affected the expression of several calcium-binding
proteins (Table
S2). Drosophila possessing a mutant Giiispla2 gene
(Table
S6), which encodes a Ca2+ binding protein, was more
susceptible than the w control to METH,
suggesting that the disruption of Ca2+ homeostasis affects
apoptosis. Alternatively, increased susceptibility of the Giiispla2 mutants
might be related to altered arachidonic acid metabolism (Table
S1).Iron chelators also activate a hypoxia stress-response pathway. We found that the
METH syndrome decreases the expression of ferritin and aconitase (Table S2).
Iron chelators induce the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and
glycolytic enzymes [16], [88]. These studies highlight the diversity of cellular
responses to iron chelators and suggest that these multifunctional antiapoptotic
agents may enhance survival by suppressing ROS generation as well as by inducing
glycolytic enzymes, such as aldolase and enolase, and glucose channels. Changes
in the expression of these genes are observed in the METH syndrome (Table S2
& Table 1).In summary, our observations indicate that METH impacts pathways associated with
hypoxia and/or the Warburg effect, pathways in which cellular energy is
predominantly produced by glycolysis rather than by oxidative respiration. These
results are consistent with the fact that METH use is associated with the
formation of lactic acid (Figure
2) [8]; lactate dehydrogenase mRNA was over-transcribed
1.8-fold in METH-treated flies (p<0.01). Further work is
required to validate the role of these pathways in response to METH. However, an
approach based on systems biology, validated by mutant analysis or feeding
studies or both, has the potential to accelerate the discovery of the molecular
effects of drugs and potential dietary factors that can alleviate the effects of
drugs. Additionally, two mutants for two separate genes with previously unknown
function (CG14280 and CG7796) were more susceptible to METH (as compared to the
non-mutant control flies), raising the possibility that systems biology in
combination with targeted mutant analysis could be useful for elucidating other
unknown aspects of METHtoxicity (Table S6).
Materials and Methods
Drosophila melanogaster stock
The w strain was obtained from Dr. Misha Ludwig
(University of Chicago) and reared on the Formula 24®
Drosophila diet (Carolina Biological Supply, Burlington,
NC) at 22–23°C and 60–70% humidity.
METH bioassays
For microarrays and proteomic and metabolomic experiments, virgin male flies were
collected during the sixth to seventh hours following eclosion from the pupae
[89]
and cultured for 5 days. Twenty of these flies were then placed on a standard
fly diet (control) or a diet supplemented with 0.6% (w/v) METH (Sigma,
M8750, St. Louis, MO) for 24 h. Three biological replicates were performed for
each experiment (for a total of six samples). At the end of the 24 h feeding
period, the 20 flies were collected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored
at −80°C. These samples were subsequently used in the DNA oligoarray
experiments, proteomic or metabolite analyses.For toxicology experiments of sugar feeding treatments, virgin male flies were
collected as aforementioned, and cultured for 5 days. Nine of these flies were
placed on one of following diets: 1) 0.6% (w/v) METH (methamphetamines),
2) 0.6% METH+5% (0.189M) trehalose (Sigma, T9449, St. Louis,
MO), 3) 0.6% METH+5% (0.189M) sucrose (Sigma, 84097, St.
Louis, MO), and 4) 0.6% METH+0.189M sorbitol (Sigma, W302902, St.
Louis, MO). Three biological replicates were performed for each treatment.For toxicology experiments of mutant flies, 3–5-day-old male flies were
collected to determine the lethal time 50 (LT50). Five of these flies
were placed on either a standard fly diet (control) or a diet supplemented with
0.6% (w/v) METH. Six biological replicates were performed for each
mutant. Mutant flies were ordered from Bloomington Drosophila
Stock Center at Indiana University.
Microarray experiment
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent for each replicate (Invitrogen Life
Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Three replicates each were used for control and
METH-treated flies. DNA contamination was removed by DNaseI set (Qiagen Inc.,
Valencia, CA) followed by another step of Trizol extraction to remove DNase.
Affymetrix oligoarray experiments were performed as described in Pedra
et al.
[90]. Amplified
cRNA was hybridized to Affymetrix Drosophila Genome 2.0 Arrays
(Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA); this array allows for the potential analysis of
over 18,500 different Drosophila transcripts.
Gene-chip-operating software (GCOS 1.4) was used to quantify the images.
Microarray data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database
with accession number GSE16198.
Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR)
cDNA was synthesized using 1 µg of total RNA with iScript cDNA kit
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) in a 20 µl reaction. Primers (Table S7)
were designed by primer3 online and Genscript Real-Time PCR Primer Design
(http://fokker.wi.mit.edu/primer3/input.htm & https://www.genscript.com/ssl-bin/app/primer). The 2× iQ
SYBR Green Supermix was purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). qRT-PCRs were
performed on an iCycler Thermal Cycler with an annealing temperature of 60°C
and 30 cycles. Each cDNA sample has triplicates. The statistical analyses of the
relative gene expression level were performed using the SAS TTEST (SAS Institute
Inc., Cary, NC). AFFX-Dros-ACTIN_M_r was used as the reference gene, and the
significance analysis of the microarray (SAM) and transcriptional analyses of 21
genes were performed on it.
Metabolomic and GC/MS procedure
For metabolite extraction, each sample was removed from the freezer and 200
µL of 100% ethanol was added to each tube. A sterile plastic pellet
pestle was used to grind each sample for 3 minutes. The samples were then placed
onto a heating block set to 80°C. After 10 minutes, 400 µL of
methanol/water (50∶50 v/v) mixture was added and vortexed for 30 minutes
at room temperature. Once the extraction was complete, the tubes were
centrifuged at 13,000 g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to a new
tube and dried using a rotary evaporation device at 43°C for 3 hours. The
samples were derivatized with 20 µL of O-Methylhydroxylamine-HCl solution
(20 mg/mL anhydrous pyridine) by heating them to 60°C for 30 minutes.
Subsequently, 30 µL of MSTFA labeling reagent was added to each tube and
incubated at 60°C for one hour. After the heating process, each sample was
allowed to cool to room temperature and then transferred to a glass autosampler
vial.The GC-MS instruments used were the Pegasus 4D GCxGC-TOFMS from Leco Corp (St.
Joseph, MI), an Agilent 6890N GC, and an Agilent 7683B Series autosampler. The
first dimension column was a HP-5MS phase, 30 m length, 0.250 mm I.D., 0.25 um
film. The second dimension column was a DB-17 phase, 1 m length, 0.100 mm I.D.,
0.10 um film. Both columns were from Agilent. A 3 µL injection was made
for each sample using helium as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/minute.The front inlet split was set to 20 and the inlet temperature was 280°C. The
temperature gradient was as follows: 50°C for 0.20 minutes, ramped
10°C/min to 250°C and held for 10 minutes, ramped 25°C/min to
300°C and held for 5 minutes. The second dimension temperature profile was
exactly the same, only +20°C. The transfer line between GC and MS was
set to 250°C. The MS had a solvent delay of 150 seconds. Data were collected
from 30–1000 m/z with an acquisition rate of 100 spectra/second. The
detector voltage was 1700 and electron energy was −70 V. The ion source
was set to 200°C. All data were processed using Leco ChromaTOF software
(Version 3.32). Area and height calculations were based on the 73 ion. Standard
curves for the trehalose metabolite were generated, using an equimolar mixture
of standards at 5 concentrations (0.5, 0.25, 0.05, 0.025, and 0.005
µmols).
Statistical analyses for FDR in microarrays, cellular metabolomics, and
toxicity
The oligoarray data were transformed by log base 2 and normalized by
AFFX-Dros-ACTIN_M_r, and then analyzed using the significance analysis of
microarrays (SAM) [91]. A list of genes with associated
q-values [92] was generated using defined false discovery rates
(FDRs) (we used 5% and 10%). The q-value gives
the minimum value at which that gene will be considered significant. The
cellular metabolomics dataset was analyzed by absolute quantification: a
separate standard curve was completed for each metabolite, which allowed us to
regress the density (area under the curve) to a known concentration of the
metabolite. The standards curve was estimated by regressing density on
concentration to obtain the linear coefficient. This coefficient, estimated
independently for each metabolite, was then used to convert observed densities
in the experimental data to quantities (µmoles) of the cellular
metabolites.The quantified data were then transformed by logs and analyzed by SAS Proc Mixed
as a split plot with treatments; biological replicates within treatments were
analyzed as whole plot effects, and cellular metabolites and cellular
metabolite×treatment interactions were analyzed as split plot effects
since all cellular metabolites sampled were correlated within a replicate.
Replicates within treatments were the error term used to test treatment effects,
while residue was used to test cellular metabolite×treatment interactions.
The cellular metabolite×treatment interaction was the term of greatest
interest, as it indicated which cellular metabolites were being affected by
treatments. If the interaction was significant, means by cellular metabolite
were compared for treatment effects by comparisons using single degrees of
freedom.For the toxicology experiments involving sugar feeding (Table S7)
and mutant screening (Table S8), data were analyzed using the
PROBIT procedure of SAS. The PROBIT procedure computes maximum likelihood
estimates of the parameters of the probit equation using a modified
Newton-Raphson algorithm. When the response Y is binary, with values 0 and 1,
the probit equation is
p = Pr(Y = 0) = C+(1−C)F(x'B),
where B is a vector of parameter estimates, F is a cumulative distribution
function (normal, logistic, or extreme value), x is a vector of explanatory
variables, p is the probability of a response, C is the natural (threshold)
response rate. The PROBIT procedure fits a common slope cumulative model, which
is a parallel-line regression model based on the cumulative probabilities of the
response categories rather than on their individual probabilities. The
cumulative model has the form Pr
(Y
DNA transcription factor binding motif analyses
The method of analysis was as described by Li et al.
[93].
Transcription factor binding motifs (TFBMs) may regulate gene transcription in
response to METH. Thus, we assessed the potential TFBMs of the 18 up-regulated
genes (5% FDR) and 5 down-regulated genes (10% FDR) in response to
METH treatment. The promoter regions near the genes were analyzed. The analysis
included the 800 bp upstream and 200 bp downstream region from the transcription
start site (TSS) of the gene. The distance indicates a dissimilarity measurement
between any pair of position weight matrices (PWMs), so the smaller the value,
the more similarity between the PWM and the mammalian TFBM. Distances of 0.1 or
less indicated that the D. melanogaster TFBM was very similar
to the respective mammalian one.
Proteomic analyses
Sample preparation
Proteins were denatured and reduced with 8 M Urea (Fischer Scientific) and 10
mM dithiothreitol (DTT) (Fischer Scientific) for 1.5 hours at 37°C
followed by further reduction and alkylation with 0.5%
Triethylphosphine (TEP), 2% 2-Iodoethanol and 97.5%
Acetonitrile for 1.5 hours at 37°C. Proteins were trypsin digested at a
ratio of 1∶50 (w/w trypsin/protein) overnight at 37°C. The
supernatant was removed and applied to a C18 microspin column (Nest Group,
Southborough, MA) for buffer exchange and desalting. The resulting peptides
were dried down and resuspended in 100 µl 0.01% TFA in
water.
NanoLC-Chip-MS
The peptides (0.5 µg) were concentrated on the on-chip 300SB-C18
enrichment column at a flow rate of 4 µl/min for 5 minutes and
separated with the on-chip C-18 reversed phase ZORBAX 300SB-C18 (0.75
µm×150 mm; Agilent) analytical column coupled to the
electrospray ionization (ESI) source of the ion trap mass spectrometer (1100
Series LC equipped with HPLC chip interface, Agilent, XCT Plus, Agilent). A
55 min linear gradient from 5%–35% buffer B (100%
acetonitrile, 0.01% TFA) at a rate of 300 nl/min, followed by a 10
minute gradient from 35%–100% buffer B was used to elute
the column. After elution of the column, an isocratic flow (5% buffer
B) at 300 nl/min was used for equilibration.
NanoLC-Chip-MS/MS and targeted MS/MS
Peptides were separated on a nanoLC-Chip system (1100 Series LC equipped with
HPLC chip interface, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) using the same platform as
described above. Automated MS/MS spectra were acquired during the run in the
data-dependent acquisition mode with the selection of the three most
abundant precursor ions.
Data mining
The raw data files were converted into mzXML format using Bruker's
CompassXport program and then analyzed using the “Proteomics Discovery
Pipeline” (PDP). A chi-square statistical analysis was used to
determine the significant peaks that were present in one group
(e.g. treated) but not in the other (untreated). Peaks
present in both sample groups but with significantly different intensities
were evaluated by the standard two-sample t-test. The peptide peaks were
ranked by their p-values and by their fold-change. The
cut-off values were set at a 5% false discovery rate
(p-value<0.05) and 2-fold or greater change in
protein quantity. All peaks with p-values less than the
cut-off were selected as differentially expressed peptides between the
treated and untreated groups.
Protein identification
NanoLC-Chip-MS/MS results were analyzed using Spectrum Mill A.03.02.060
software (Agilent Technologies) and searches were performed against the
National Institutes of Health National Center for Biotechnology Information
(NCBI) protein database specifically for Drosophila. The
parameters of the search were as follows: no more than two tryptic
miscleavages allowed, cysteine searched as iodoethanol, 1.0 Da peptide mass
tolerance and 0.7 Da MS/MS mass tolerance. Only peptides with a score of 6
or higher and %SPI of 60 or higher were considered true
positives.
Overlap of MS and MS/MS data
A significant peak list, a treated peptide/protein list and an untreated
peptide/protein list were generated from MS and MS/MS data, and the lists
were combined. The MS and MS/MS raw data were compared to guarantee that the
molecular information [m/z (+/−0.7 Da), retention time
(+/−0.5 min), charge state] and chromatographic patterns
were the same.
Gene ontology and KEGG analyses
The GeneChip Drosophila Genome 2.0 Array contains probe sets
interrogating 18,952 genes from Drosophila, 14,705 of which
used in the design of this array can be found in Flybase (http://flybase.org/). A combination of fold-change and test
p-value methods are used to identify differentially
expressed genes between control and METH treatments. For this method, genes
were ordered on p-values derived from the t-statistic and
reported only when a fold-change was greater than the given
threshold–a practice commonly used in cDNA microarray data analysis
[94].
Cutoff was set by a p value≤0.005 and the absolute
fold-change ≥1.5 to choose differentially expressed genes.Gene ontology categorization and pathway comparison were performed using the
following databases: gene ontology (GO) system (http://www.geneontology.org) [95] and Kyoto
Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/) [96]. Fisher's exact
test was used to test the statistical significance of associations between
the gene list and expression changes and function set [97]. Significance levels for
pathway comparisons were set by hit number >2, allowing any assumptions
about the shape of sampling distribution of population to be avoided.
Network analyses
Differentially expressed transcripts and proteins identified in this study
were compared with known networks in MetaCore integrated knowledge database
using statistical tests and scoring for network relevance to the dataset,
functional processes, cellular pathways and transcription factors of GeneGo
software (http://www.genego.com/metacore.php) and DAVID.
MetaCore™ is based on a proprietary manually curated database of human
protein-protein, protein-DNA and protein compound interactions, metabolic
and signaling pathways for human, mouse and rat, supported by proprietary
ontologies and controlled vocabulary. The most highly significant pathways
are summarized in Figure S2 and S3.Human gene orthologs of proteins in
Drosophila genes and their respective human gene orthologs
were compared using David annotation software. The genes found to have the
same function in Drosophila and humans were used to create
the pie chart. The genes (Entrez_GeneID) observed for each of the pathways
are: glycolysis (31532, 33351, 33824, 35728, 42185, 42620, and 43447),
biotin metabolism (31551, 32095), steroid metabolism (53507 and 53511),
oxidative phosphorylation (42591, 43829, 37617, 42291, and 41550), pyruvate
metabolism (42620 and 42185), lipid metabolism (33824 and 33839), amino acid
metabolism (41561), apoptosis and survival (35748), citrate cycle (42185),
and starch and sucrose metabolism (53507 and 326264).(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Regulatory process maps based on proteomic and transcriptomic
data. Statistically significant regulatory process maps
(networks) using genomic and proteomic data from Drosophila
melanogaster treated with METH. Microarray and protein chip
data are shown in red and blue, respectively. The networks maps were
identified using the MetaCore integrated knowledge database.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Regulatory metabolic maps based on proteomic and transcriptomic
data. Statistically significant metabolic maps (networks) in
Drosophila melanogaster associated METH treatment,
based on proteomic and transcriptomic data. Microarray and protein chip data
are shown in red and blue, respectively. Common pathways are given in green.
The network maps were identified using the MetaCore integrated knowledge
database.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Transcriptional factor binding motifs (TFBMs) impacted by METH
exposure. (A) TFBMs detected from 17 of up-regulated genes with
<5% FDR. (B) TFBMs detected from 5 of down-regulated genes with
<10% FDR. Sequence logo was generated using the WEBLOGO
program.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Transcriptional factor binding motifs (TFBMs) associated with
over-transcribed genes. Over-transcribed transcripts by
methamphetamine in Drosophila melanogaster and the possible
transcription factor binding motifs (TFBMs) relative to the gene
transcription start site (TSS). Different symbols represent possible motifs.
All transcripts are labeled with their respective gene names.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Transcriptional factor binding motifs (TFBMs) associated with
under-transcribed genes. Under-transcribed genes in
Drosophila melanogaster in response to treatment with
methamphetamines and the possible transcription factor binding motifs
(TFBMs) relative to the gene transcription start site (TSS). Different
symbols represent different possible motifs. All transcripts are labeled
with their respective gene names.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Trehalose levels of METH-fed insects monitored by gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). (A) GC/MS chromatogram
of trehalose (the x-axis represents the retention time);
the dotted line represents the control sample; the continuous line
represents the METH-fed sample at mass 73. (B) Log scale of the area of
control vs. METH with standard error bars (P<0.01). (C)
Spectrum of trehalose. (D) Structure of trehalose that had been silylated
using N-Methyl-N-trifluoroacetamide, Sialylation reagent (MSTFA)
reagent.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Pathways are ranked by the number of proteins represented on protein
chips and the number of genes represented on microarray.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Proteins observed over- and under-expressed in methamphetamine-fed
w1118
adults.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.genes and human gene orthologs were compared using David annotation
software.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Potential transcription factor binding motifs (TFBMs) observed from
over- and under-transcribed genes in w1118
adults treated with methamphetamine.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Genes that were differentially expressed in the microarray experiments,
based on FDR analysis, at the q<10% levels in
after 5-day-old flies were exposed to a diet containing 0.6%
methamphetamine, as compared with flies reared on control diet.
Members of this gene set were used to predict potential transcription factor
binding motifs.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.The lethal time 50 (LT50) of
mutants fed media containing methamphetamine.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.The reverse and forward primers used for the qRT-PCR
experiments.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Genes that were differentially transcribed (based on qRT–PCR) in
w1118
adults after 5-day-old virgin male flies were exposed to a diet
containing 0.6% methamphetamine, as compared with flies reared on
control diet.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Results.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Jeffrey M Grabowski; Rushika Perera; Ali M Roumani; Victoria E Hedrick; Halina D Inerowicz; Catherine A Hill; Richard J Kuhn Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2016-02-09
Authors: Isabel M Vincent; Darren J Creek; Karl Burgess; Debra J Woods; Richard J S Burchmore; Michael P Barrett Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2012-05-01