| Literature DB >> 21533125 |
Shouki Yatsushiro1, Rie Akamine, Shohei Yamamura, Mami Hino, Kazuaki Kajimoto, Kaori Abe, Hiroko Abe, Jun-ichi Kido, Masato Tanaka, Yasuo Shinohara, Yoshinobu Baba, Toshihiko Ooie, Masatoshi Kataoka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is one of the most frequently employed assays for clinical diagnosis, since this enables the investigator to identify specific protein biomarkers. However, the conventional assay using a 96-well microtitration plate is time- and sample-consuming, and therefore is not suitable for rapid diagnosis. To overcome these drawbacks, we performed a sandwich ELISA on a microchip. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21533125 PMCID: PMC3080136 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Schematic process for detection of PICP on a microchip with deposition and fixation of 1st antibody by piezoelectric ink printing.
After fixation of antibody on the surface of the microchannel and sealing with a cover film, blocking solution was infused into each microchannel from the reservoir (wells 1, 3, 5, and 7) by use of a pipetman.
Reproducibility of luminescence intensity of PICP in 1 channel.
| Spot number | PICP (ng/ml) | |||
| 0 | 150 | 300 | 600 | |
| 1 | 4164 | 19292 | 61840 | 106188 |
| 2 | 3932 | 19304 | 62780 | 102992 |
| 3 | 3840 | 17352 | 54020 | 118584 |
| Average | 3979 | 18649 | 59547 | 109255 |
| RSD (%) | 4.2 | 6.0 | 8.1 | 7.5 |
Reproducibility of luminescence intensity of PICP in 3 different channels.
| Channel number | PICP (ng/ml) | |||
| 0 | 150 | 300 | 600 | |
| 1 | 4305 | 16661 | 55275 | 111513 |
| 2 | 4125 | 17923 | 65007 | 128005 |
| 3 | 3979 | 18649 | 59547 | 109255 |
| Average | 4136 | 17744 | 59943 | 116258 |
| RSD (%) | 4.0 | 5.7 | 8.1 | 8.8 |
Figure 2Detection of purified PICP by sandwich ELISA on a microchip.
Three deposits of 1st antibody were made into each microchannel, and 0 to 600 ng/ml PICP and peroxidase-conjugated 2nd antibody solution were then infused, allowing triplicate determinations to be made in 1 channel. (A) The luminescence increased in a PICP concentration-dependent manner. (B) Standard curve for the PICP concentration versus luminescence intensity obtained by the assay.
Figure 3Comparative analysis of the values obtained with the microchip method and the conventional microtitration plate method.
Linear regression analysis was used.
Reproducibility of microchip method for the determination of PICP in serum samples.
| Sample | PICP | |
| Mean ± S, ng/ml | CV, % | |
| Within day, n = 4 | ||
| 1 | 327.4±10.3 | 3.2 |
| 2 | 479.2±47.2 | 9.8 |
| 3 | 623.7±46.4 | 7.4 |
| Between days, n = 4 | ||
| 4 | 874.5±45.0 | 5.2 |
| 5 | 580.7±39.7 | 6.8 |
| 6 | 657.9±28.9 | 4.4 |