OBJECTIVE: To find out, from the health professionals' point of view, how different immigrant groups access and use the health services. DESIGN: Qualitative, descriptive and phenomenological study carried out in Barcelona between September and December of 2007. SETTING: The study was carried out in the 6 Basic Health Areas of Barcelona, where there is a higher percentage of immigrant population, and in 3 public hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 73 hospital and primary health care professionals. Theoretical sampling was carried out on respondents who defined 4 professional profiles: directors or coordinators, physicians, nurses, and cultural mediators. METHODS: There were 7 debate groups and 12 partly-structured interviews. Both the interviews and groups were analysed by a narrative analysis of the content. RESULTS: The outcomes indicate that, according to the professionals, the immigrant patients do not find barriers that can make their access to health services more difficult. The perception that the emergency service is their main access gate for them is unanimous, as well as that most of the immigrant patients have less continuity of care. Finally, professionals detect differences in the access and use of health services depending on their origin and the level of social integration of the immigrant group. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals attribute a higher use of emergencies, late access to the health services, and less continuity of care, to a series of factors related to economic precariousness and to aspects related to the social inclusion. There is the room for social inclusion policies to reduce these inequalities. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: To find out, from the health professionals' point of view, how different immigrant groups access and use the health services. DESIGN: Qualitative, descriptive and phenomenological study carried out in Barcelona between September and December of 2007. SETTING: The study was carried out in the 6 Basic Health Areas of Barcelona, where there is a higher percentage of immigrant population, and in 3 public hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 73 hospital and primary health care professionals. Theoretical sampling was carried out on respondents who defined 4 professional profiles: directors or coordinators, physicians, nurses, and cultural mediators. METHODS: There were 7 debate groups and 12 partly-structured interviews. Both the interviews and groups were analysed by a narrative analysis of the content. RESULTS: The outcomes indicate that, according to the professionals, the immigrant patients do not find barriers that can make their access to health services more difficult. The perception that the emergency service is their main access gate for them is unanimous, as well as that most of the immigrant patients have less continuity of care. Finally, professionals detect differences in the access and use of health services depending on their origin and the level of social integration of the immigrant group. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals attribute a higher use of emergencies, late access to the health services, and less continuity of care, to a series of factors related to economic precariousness and to aspects related to the social inclusion. There is the room for social inclusion policies to reduce these inequalities. Copyright Â
Authors: J Garcia Campayo; C González Broto; B Buil; M García Luengo; L Caballero; F Collazo Journal: Actas Esp Psiquiatr Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.196
Authors: Francesc Ramos-Roure; Maria Feijoo-Cid; Josep Maria Manresa-Dominguez; Jordi Segura-Bernal; Rosa García-Sierra; Maria Isabel Fernández-Cano; Pere Toran-Monserrat Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: M Provencio; N Romero; J Tabernero; R Vera; D V Baz; A Arraiza; C Camps; E Felip; P Garrido; B Gaspar; M Llombart; A López; I Magallón; V M Ibáñez; J M Olmos; C Mur; A Navarro-Ruiz; A Pastor; M Peiró; J Polo; Á Rodríguez-Lescure Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Isabel Cuadrado-Gordillo; Guadalupe Martín-Mora-Parra; Ismael Puig-Amores Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-10 Impact factor: 4.614