OBJECTIVE: To compare health services utilization between the immigrant and indigenous populations in Spain. METHODS: We used information provided by the following four health surveys carried out around 2005: Catalonia 2005; city of Madrid 2005, Canary Islands 2004 and the Autonomous Community of Valencia 2005. The health services studied were general practice, specialist services, emergency services, hospitalization, and two preventive services: pap smear test and mammography. RESULTS: In general, most health services were less frequently used by the immigrant population than by the Spanish population. The health services showing the least differences between the two populations were general practice and hospitalization, while the greatest differences were found in the use of specialist and preventive services. The most heterogeneous results were found in general practice and hospitalization, since some immigrant groups showed a relatively high frequency of use in some geographical areas and a relatively low frequency in other areas. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study reproduce those found in other studies carried out in countries with similar social and economic characteristics to Spain. Like previous results, the present results are difficult to explain. Future research should aim to use other study designs and to test hypotheses not put forward by the scientific community to date.
OBJECTIVE: To compare health services utilization between the immigrant and indigenous populations in Spain. METHODS: We used information provided by the following four health surveys carried out around 2005: Catalonia 2005; city of Madrid 2005, Canary Islands 2004 and the Autonomous Community of Valencia 2005. The health services studied were general practice, specialist services, emergency services, hospitalization, and two preventive services: pap smear test and mammography. RESULTS: In general, most health services were less frequently used by the immigrant population than by the Spanish population. The health services showing the least differences between the two populations were general practice and hospitalization, while the greatest differences were found in the use of specialist and preventive services. The most heterogeneous results were found in general practice and hospitalization, since some immigrant groups showed a relatively high frequency of use in some geographical areas and a relatively low frequency in other areas. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study reproduce those found in other studies carried out in countries with similar social and economic characteristics to Spain. Like previous results, the present results are difficult to explain. Future research should aim to use other study designs and to test hypotheses not put forward by the scientific community to date.
Authors: Davide Malmusi; Dušan Drbohlav; Dagmar Dzúrová; Laia Palència; Carme Borrell Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Ana Clara Zoni; María Felicitas Domínguez-Berjón; María Dolores Esteban-Vasallo; Luis Miguel Velázquez-Buendía; Vendula Blaya-Nováková; Enrique Regidor Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2018-04
Authors: Miguel A Salinero-Fort; Rodrigo Jiménez-García; Carmen de Burgos-Lunar; Rosa M Chico-Moraleja; Paloma Gómez-Campelo Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: L A Gimeno-Feliu; R Magallón-Botaya; R M Macipe-Costa; L Luzón-Oliver; J L Cañada-Millan; M Lasheras-Barrio Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2013-06
Authors: Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez; Fernando G Benavides; Emily Felt; Elena Ronda-Pérez; Carmen Vives-Cases; Ana M García Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-12-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez; Diana Gil-González; Carmen Vives-Cases; John G Love; Peter Wimpenny; Elena Ronda-Pérez Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 2.655