Literature DB >> 21530381

Online health consultation: examining uses of an interactive cancer communication tool by low-income women with breast cancer.

Hsueh-Yi Lu1, Bret R Shaw, David H Gustafson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine how psychosocial variables predicted use of an online health consultation service among low-income breast cancer patients and in turn how using this service affected these same psychosocial outcomes.
METHOD: This retrospective study included 231 recently diagnosed, low-income (at or below 250% of the federal poverty level) breast cancer patients provided a free computer with 16 weeks of access to the Internet-based 'Ask an Expert' service offered as part of the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS) "Living with Breast Cancer" program. The use activity included a total of 502 messages submitted to the online health consultation service. The data included five psychosocial variables: information seeking, social support, health self efficacy, participation in health care, and doctor-patient relationship, were collected at both the pre-test and 16-week post-test after using the service. Correlation tests were conducted to examine the relationship between pre- and post-test, and use activity. A multiple regression model was formed for each of five psychosocial variables to examine how use activity of the consultation service was associated with various psychosocial measurements.
RESULTS: In total, 865 distinct consulting queries from 502 messages were identified as measurement of patients' use activities (3.74 consulting queries per participant). Use activity had significant negative relationships with pre-test scores across all five psychosocial variables. The regression models found significant positive main effects (use activity) associated with three of these psychosocial variables: health self efficacy, participation in health care and doctor-patient relationship. Use activity of the online consultation service did not have significant relationships with the dependent variables of information seeking and perceived social support.
CONCLUSION: Low-income breast cancer patients sought out information from an online cancer information expert. Patients with more negative perceptions at pre-test tended to use the service more. Greater use of the service was associated with improvement in patients' perception of health self-efficacy, participation in health care and doctor-patient relationship. Moreover, use of online health consultation appears to level the differences, narrowing the gaps between those who were worse and better off at pre-test. These findings suggest that online health consultation can serve as an effective complement to other resources, which help low-income, breast cancer patients feel more confident to participate more actively in their health care, become more actively involved in making decisions about their treatments and enhance the relationship with their doctors.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21530381      PMCID: PMC3627128          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  38 in total

1.  Health and the Internet for all.

Authors:  Antoine Geissbuhler; Celia Boyer
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Use and Impact of eHealth System by Low-income Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  David H Gustafson; Fiona M McTavish; William Stengle; Denise Ballard; Robert Hawkins; Bret R Shaw; Ellen Jones; Karen Julèsberg; Helene McDowell; Wei Chih Chen; Kanittha Volrathongchai; Gina Landucci
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005

3.  Reducing the digital divide for low-income women with breast cancer: a feasibility study of a population-based intervention.

Authors:  David H Gustafson; Fiona M McTavish; William Stengle; Denise Ballard; Ellen Jones; Karen Julesberg; Helene McDowell; Gina Landucci; Robert Hawkins
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005

4.  An exploratory study of predictors of participation in a computer support group for women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Bret R Shaw; Robert Hawkins; Neeraj Arora; Fiona McTavish; Suzanne Pingree; David H Gustafson
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women.

Authors:  Georgia N L Johnston Polacek; Mary Carol Ramos; Robert L Ferrer
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-25

Review 6.  Breast cancer. Part 3: Psychosocial care.

Authors:  S Carroll
Journal:  Prof Nurse       Date:  1998-09

7.  How women with breast cancer learn using interactive cancer communication systems.

Authors:  Bret R Shaw; Jeong Yeob Han; Timothy Baker; Jeffre Witherly; Robert P Hawkins; Fiona McTavish; David H Gustafson
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-07-07

8.  Enhancing cancer control: assessing cancer knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in disadvantaged communities.

Authors:  T G Scroggins; T K Bartley
Journal:  J La State Med Soc       Date:  1999-04

9.  The use of an Internet-based Ask the Doctor Service involving family physicians: evaluation by a web survey.

Authors:  Göran Umefjord; Katarina Hamberg; Hans Malker; Göran Petersson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Information needs and visitors' experience of an Internet expert forum on infertility.

Authors:  Wolfgang Himmel; Juliane Meyer; Michael M Kochen; Hans Wilhelm Michelmann
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  10 in total

1.  Interactivity, Presence, and Targeted Patient Care: Mapping e-Health Intervention Effects Over Time for Cancer Patients with Depression.

Authors:  Sojung Claire Kim; Bret R Shaw; Dhavan V Shah; Robert P Hawkins; Suzanne Pingree; Fiona M McTavish; David H Gustafson
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-11-14

Review 2.  A Scoping Review of Food Insecurity and Related Factors among Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Courtney A Parks; Leah R Carpenter; Kristen R Sullivan; Whitney Clausen; Tony Gargano; Tracy L Wiedt; Colleen Doyle; Kanako Kashima; Amy L Yaroch
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 3.  How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Safa ElKefi; Onur Asan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side Effects of Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lorraine Warrington; Kate Absolom; Mark Conner; Ian Kellar; Beverly Clayton; Michael Ayres; Galina Velikova
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Socio-economic differences in patient participation behaviours in doctor-patient interactions-A systematic mapping review of the literature.

Authors:  Sarah Allen; Simon N Rogers; Rebecca V Harris
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  An online Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eClinic (TrueNTH SHAReClinic) for prostate cancer patients: a feasibility study.

Authors:  A G Matthew; L J Trachtenberg; Z G Yang; J Robinson; A Petrella; D McLeod; L Walker; R Wassersug; S Elliott; J Ellis; L Jamnicky; N Fleshner; A Finelli; R Singal; G Brock; K Jarvi; J Bender; D Elterman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Beginning a patient-centered approach in the design of a diabetes prevention program.

Authors:  Richard W Seidel; Kimberlee A Pardo; Paul A Estabrooks; Emptyyn Y WenYou; Sarah S Wall; Brenda M Davy; Fabio A Almeida
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  TrueNTH sexual recovery study protocol: a multi-institutional collaborative approach to developing and testing a web-based intervention for couples coping with the side-effects of prostate cancer treatment in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  D Wittmann; A Mehta; L Northouse; R Dunn; T Braun; A Duby; L An; L Arab; R Bangs; S Bober; J Brandon; M Coward; M Dunn; M Galbraith; M Garcia; J Giblin; M Glode; B Koontz; A Lowe; S Mitchell; J Mulhall; C Nelson; K Paich; C Saigal; T Skolarus; J Stanford; T Walsh; C E Pollack
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Mobile Breast Cancer e-Support Program for Chinese Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy (Part 3): Secondary Data Analysis.

Authors:  Haihua Zhu; Xiuwan Chen; Jinqiu Yang; Qiaoling Wu; Jiemin Zhu; Sally Wai-Chi Chan
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Online Medical Record Nonuse Among Patients: Data Analysis Study of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Safa Elkefi; Zhongyuan Yu; Onur Asan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.