Literature DB >> 16377608

Use and Impact of eHealth System by Low-income Women With Breast Cancer.

David H Gustafson1, Fiona M McTavish, William Stengle, Denise Ballard, Robert Hawkins, Bret R Shaw, Ellen Jones, Karen Julèsberg, Helene McDowell, Wei Chih Chen, Kanittha Volrathongchai, Gina Landucci.   

Abstract

This article is the second of a two-part series reporting on a population-based study intended to use an eHealth system to examine the feasibility of reaching underserved women with breast cancer (Gustafson, McTavish et al., Reducing the digital divide for low-income women with breast cancer, 2004; Madison Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin; Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System [CHESS]) and determine how they use the system and what impact it had on them. Participants included women recently diagnosed with breast cancer whose income was at or below 250% of poverty level and were living in rural Wisconsin (n = 144; all Caucasian) or Detroit (n = 85; all African American). Because this was a population-based study all 229 participants received CHESS. A comparison group of patients (n = 51) with similar demographics was drawn from a separate recently completed randomized clinical trial. Use rates (e.g., frequency and length of use as well as type of use) as well as impact on several dimensions of quality of life and participation in health care are reported. Low-income subjects in this study logged on and spent more time on CHESS than more affluent women in a previous study. Urban African Americans used information and analysis services more and communication services less than rural Caucasians. When all low-income women from this study are combined and compared with a low-income control group from another study, the CHESS group was superior to that control group in 4 of 8 outcome variables at both statistically and practically significant levels (social support, negative emotions, participation in health care, and information competence). When African Americans and Caucasians are separated the control group's sample size becomes 30 and 21 thus reducing power. Statistical significance is retained, however, in all four outcomes for Caucasians and in two of four for African Americans. Practical significance is retained for all four outcomes. We conclude that an eHealth system like CHESS will be used extensively and have a positive impact on low-income women with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16377608     DOI: 10.1080/10810730500263257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  78 in total

1.  Predictors of supportive message expression and reception in an interactive cancer communication system.

Authors:  Eunkyung Kim; Jeong Yeob Han; Dhavan Shah; Bret Shaw; Fiona McTavish; David H Gustafson; David Fan
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-06-22

2.  Predictors and Effects of Training on an Online Health Education and Support System for Women with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Helene McDowell; Eunkyung Kim; Bret R Shaw; Jeong Yeob Han; Lauren Gumieny
Journal:  J Comput Mediat Commun       Date:  2010-04

3.  Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model.

Authors:  Kuang-Yi Wen; David H Gustafson; Robert P Hawkins; Patricia F Brennan; Susan Dinauer; Pauley R Johnson; Tracy Siegler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Bridging the critical chasm between service and research: the Cancer Information Service's collaboratory.

Authors:  Linda Squiers; Nigel Bush; Robin Vanderpool; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Cecilia Fabrizio
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Frequency and type of use of a home-based, Internet intervention for adolescent smoking cessation.

Authors:  Christi A Patten; Emily Rock; Tracy M Meis; Paul A Decker; Robert C Colligan; Suzanne Pingree; Ellen A Dornelas; Kenneth P Offord; Eric W Boberg; David H Gustafson
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  The NCI Digital Divide Pilot Projects: implications for cancer education.

Authors:  Gary L Kreps; David Gustafson; Peter Salovey; Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia; Wayne Wilbright; Mary Anne Bright; Cathy Muha
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Engagement with INSPIRE, an Online Program for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors.

Authors:  Karen L Syrjala; Marie-Laure Crouch; Wendy M Leisenring; Mary E D Flowers; Samantha B Artherholt; Allison Stover Fiscalini; Eleni Romano; Joan M Romano; Paul J Martin; Jean C Yi
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jessica Weidmann; Kezhen Fei; Jenny J Lin; Howard Leventhal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Antecedent characteristics of online cancer information seeking among rural breast cancer patients: an application of the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) model.

Authors:  Bret R Shaw; Lori L Dubenske; Jeong Yeob Han; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Nigel Bush; David H Gustafson; Fiona McTavish
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-06

10.  Opinion Leaders in Online Cancer Support Groups: An Investigation of Their Antecedents and Consequences.

Authors:  Eunkyung Kim; Dietram A Scheufele; Jeong Yeob Han; Dhavan Shah
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.