Literature DB >> 16870385

Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women.

Georgia N L Johnston Polacek1, Mary Carol Ramos, Robert L Ferrer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The impact of breast cancer is immense for all women, but the literature reveals an even greater impact on women of color and among socially and economically disadvantaged populations. Persistent differences in incidence and outcome are undoubtedly due to multiple factors, but one element in poor outcome may be treatment choice. Those treatments shown to be related to best outcomes are less likely to be chosen by certain groups of women. The effects of economic and cultural factors on breast cancer treatment choice have not been thoroughly explored; these factors must be understood if health care professionals are to intervene effectively to address disparities and improve breast cancer outcomes for all women.
METHODS: A review of the breast cancer literature was conducted in order to: (1) describe breast cancer disparities in the United States; (2) delineate factors that might contribute to those disparities; (3) assess possible mitigating factors for predominant causes; (4) begin to decide how health care interventions might allay the factors that contribute to disparities in breast cancer incidence and mortality.
RESULTS: Breast cancer incidence and outcome disparities in the United States are due to multiple interacting factors. These include information about treatment, different types of treatment, the emotional context of decision-making, and patient preference for level of involvement. Treatment decision-making is complex.
CONCLUSION: Health literacy and level of decision-making involvement, both embedded in social and economic reality, are key components in breast cancer treatment decision-making and may contribute to breast cancer disparities in the United States. Current models of shared decision-making may not be generalizable to all breast cancer patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Optimal breast cancer outcomes for all women depend on culturally and ethnically appropriate professional support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16870385     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  40 in total

1.  False-positive mammography and depressed mood in a screening population: findings from the New Hampshire Mammography Network.

Authors:  C J Gibson; J Weiss; M Goodrich; T Onega
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  "People Give Opinions, but the Decision Belongs to the Patient": Examining Cancer Treatment Decisions Among Latinos/as in Central Florida.

Authors:  Iraida V Carrion; Frances R Nedjat-Haiem; Tania Estapé; Lucia Franco-Estrada
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-08

3.  Living with Cancer: an Educational Intervention in Cancer Patients Can Improve Patient-Reported Knowledge Deficit.

Authors:  Leslie Padrnos; Robert Bennett; Heidi Kosiorek; Amylou C Dueck; Donald Northfelt; Joseph Mikhael; Raoul Tibes; Nandita Khera; Ruben A Mesa
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Responding to a Community's Concern: A Comparison of Breast Cancer Characteristics and Initial Treatment in Three Selected North Carolina Counties.

Authors:  Anissa I Vines; William R Carpenter; Ronald C Chen; Michele W Cherry; Debra G Long; Keith D Amos; Paul A Godley
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

5.  Health literacy and cancer prevention: two new instruments to assess comprehension.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Douglas W Roblin; Andrew E Williams; Sarah M Greene; Bridget Gaglio; Terry S Field; Mary E Costanza; Paul K J Han; Laura Saccoccio; Josephine Calvi; Erica Cove; Rebecca Cowan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-01-13

6.  Surgeon-level variation in patients' appraisals of their breast cancer treatment experiences.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Sarah E Lillie; Arden Morris; John J Graff; Ann Hamilton; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go?

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Angela Fagerlin; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Do racial/ethnic disparities exist in the utilization of high-volume surgeons for women with ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Michelle A Aranda; Marcia McGory; Evan Sekeris; Melinda Maggard; Clifford Ko; David S Zingmond
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-07-04

10.  Latina patient perspectives about informed treatment decision making for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Ann Hamilton; Jennifer J Griggs; Amy K Alderman; Mahasin Mujahid; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.