Literature DB >> 21530309

Photothermal ablation with the excimer laser sheath technique for embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: initial results from a prospective study.

William T Kuo1, Justin I Odegaard, John D Louie, Daniel Y Sze, Kamil Unver, Nishita Kothary, Jarrett K Rosenberg, David M Hovsepian, Gloria L Hwang, Lawrence V Hofmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the excimer laser sheath technique for removing embedded inferior vena cava (IVC) filters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 12 months, 25 consecutive patients undergoing attempted IVC filter retrieval with a laser-assisted sheath technique were prospectively enrolled into an institutional review board-approved study registry. There were 10 men and 15 women (mean age 50 years, range 20-76 years); 18 (72%) of 25 patients were referred from an outside hospital. Indications for retrieval included symptomatic filter-related acute caval thrombosis (with or without acute pulmonary embolism), chronic IVC occlusion, and bowel penetration. Retrieval was also performed to remove risks from prolonged implantation and potentially to eliminate need for lifelong anticoagulation. After failure of standard methods, controlled photothermal ablation of filter-adherent tissue with a Spectranetics laser sheath and CVX-300 laser system was performed. All patients were evaluated with cavography, and specimens were sent for histologic analysis.
RESULTS: Laser-assisted retrieval was successful in 24 (96%) of 25 patients as follows: 11 Günther Tulip (mean 375 days, range 127-882 days), 4 Celect (mean 387 days, range 332-440 days), 2 Option (mean 215 days, range 100-330 days), 4 OPTEASE (mean 387 days, range 71-749 days; 1 failed 188 days), 2 TRAPEASE (mean 871 days, range 187-1,555 days), and 2 Greenfield (mean 12.8 years, range 7.2-18.3 years). There was one (4%) major complication (acute thrombus, treated with thrombolysis), three (12%) minor complications (small extravasation, self-limited), and one adverse event (coagulopathic retroperitoneal hemorrhage) at follow-up (mean 126 days, range 13-302 days). Photothermal ablation of filter-adherent tissue was histologically confirmed in 23 (92%) of 25 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The laser-assisted sheath technique appears to be a safe and effective tool for retrieving embedded IVC filters, including permanent types, with implantation ranging from months to > 18 years.
Copyright © 2011 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21530309     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.01.459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  10 in total

Review 1.  Retrievable Filter Update: The Denali Vena Cava Filter.

Authors:  David Hahn
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  A 7-year retrospective review of the technical success of the "low-profile" hangman technique for complicated inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrievals.

Authors:  Heather Kate Moriarty; Elissa Marshall; Warren Clements
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Iatrogenic percutaneous vascular injuries: clinical presentation, imaging, and management.

Authors:  Benjamin H Ge; Alexander Copelan; Dominic Scola; Micah M Watts
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  Novel and Advanced Techniques for Complex IVC Filter Retrieval.

Authors:  Dania Daye; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04

5.  Feasibility and Acute Safety Study of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery to the Vena Caval Wall via an IVC Filter in Swine.

Authors:  Reza Seifabadi; William F Pritchard; Shelby Leonard; Ivane Bakhutashvili; David L Woods; Juan A Esparza-Trujillo; John W Karanian; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Eng Sci Med Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06-12

6.  IVC filter retrieval in adolescents: experience in a tertiary pediatric center.

Authors:  Anthony K Guzman; Mahmoud Zahra; Scott O Trerotola; Leslie J Raffini; Maxim Itkin; Marc S Keller; Anne Marie Cahill
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21

7.  An analysis of factors associated with increased fluoroscopy time or the need for complex techniques at IVC filter retrieval.

Authors:  Mark Kleedehn; Kelli Moore; Katherine Longo; Kaitlin Woo; Paul Laeseke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Can Pre-Retrieval Computed Tomography Predict the Difficult Removal of an Implementing an Inferior Vena Cava Filter?

Authors:  Shinho Hong; Keun-Myoung Park; Yong Sun Jeon; Soon Gu Cho; Kee Chun Hong; Woo Young Shin; Yun-Mee Choe
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2016-12-31

9.  Bidirectional Pull-Back Technique for Retrieval of Strut-Embedded Cylinder-Shaped Filters in Inferior Vena Cava.

Authors:  Xiaolong Du; Chenglong Li; Aimin Qian; Yeqing Zhang; Wendong Li; Huiying Yu; Xiaoqiang Li; Lingshang Kong
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-06-09

10.  Is external compression on the IVC a risk factor for IVC filter abutment? A single center experience of 141 infrarenal celect filter insertions.

Authors:  Sang Yub Lee; Jongmin Lee
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-05-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.