Literature DB >> 32071027

A 7-year retrospective review of the technical success of the "low-profile" hangman technique for complicated inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrievals.

Heather Kate Moriarty1, Elissa Marshall1, Warren Clements2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a modified low-profile hangman technique.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all filter retrieval procedures performed at a major trauma center, from 2012 to 2019. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, device type, device dwell time, device tilt, embedded hook, success of device retrieval, evidence of caval injury and occurrence of complications.
RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019 there were 473 filter retrieval attempts. An advanced technique was documented in 66 (14%). The low-profile hangman technique alone was documented in 23 procedures (5% of all procedures, 35% of advanced technique procedures). Average screening time was 28 minutes. At the time of retrieval attempt, 9 patients (41%) were anticoagulated. The hangman technique was employed as isolated maneuver in 23 patients and was successful on initial attempt in 22 cases (96%). The average dwell time of filters retrieved by the hangman technique was 228 days (range, 40-903 days; median, 196 days). No procedure-related complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: The retrieval of IVC filters is an important part of offering an IVC filter service. Advanced techniques to retrieve caval filters are multiple, and the risk of complications is increased in these cases. We demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a new modified and lower-profile hangman technique. This new technique could be performed with only an 11 French venous access sheath using off-the-shelf equipment and it remains a cost-effective approach to complex filter retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32071027      PMCID: PMC7051261          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.19223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  23 in total

1.  The Safety of Continuing Therapeutic Anticoagulation During Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: A 6-Year Retrospective Review from a Tertiary Centre.

Authors:  Rahil H Kassamali; Kateryna Burlak; Jonathan T L Lee; Georgina Aberdein; George Harisis; Gerard S Goh; Helen Kavnoudias; Warren Clements
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Loop-snare technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrievals.

Authors:  Lisa Rubenstein; Albert K Chun; Megan Chew; Christoph A Binkert
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Wall-embedded recovery inferior vena cava filters: imaging features and technique for removal.

Authors:  S William Stavropoulos; Jeffrey A Solomon; Scott O Trerotola
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: use of endobronchial forceps.

Authors:  S William Stavropoulos; Robert G Dixon; Charles T Burke; Joseph M Stavas; Anand Shah; Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg; Scott O Trerotola
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Assessment of snared-loop technique when standard retrieval of inferior vena cava filters fails.

Authors:  Orla Doody; Geertje Noë; Mark F Given; Peter T Foley; Stuart M Lyon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Retrieval of an embedded suprarenal inferior vena cava filter using the Hangman technique.

Authors:  Warren Clements; Rahil Kassamali; Tim Joseph
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 1.735

7.  Prolonged balloon tamponade in the initial management of inferior vena cava injury following complicated filter retrieval, without the need for surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan Tl Lee; Gerard S Goh; Tim Joseph; Jim Koukounaras; Tuan Phan; Warren Clements
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 1.735

8.  Photothermal ablation with the excimer laser sheath technique for embedded inferior vena cava filter removal: initial results from a prospective study.

Authors:  William T Kuo; Justin I Odegaard; John D Louie; Daniel Y Sze; Kamil Unver; Nishita Kothary; Jarrett K Rosenberg; David M Hovsepian; Gloria L Hwang; Lawrence V Hofmann
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Prevalence of fracture and fragment embolization of Bard retrievable vena cava filters and clinical implications including cardiac perforation and tamponade.

Authors:  William Nicholson; W Jay Nicholson; Paul Tolerico; Bradley Taylor; Samuel Solomon; Thomas Schryver; Kevin McCullum; Howard Goldberg; James Mills; Brian Schuler; Larry Shears; Lyle Siddoway; Nikhilesh Agarwal; Christopher Tuohy
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-09

10.  A comparison of clinical outcomes with retrievable and permanent inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Hyun S Kim; Mark J Young; Anand K Narayan; Kelvin Hong; Robert P Liddell; Michael B Streiff
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ibero-American Society of Interventionism (SIDI) and the Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI) Standard of Practice (SOP) for the Management of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Miguel A De Gregorio; Jose A Guirola; Sergio Sierre; Jose Urbano; Juan Jose Ciampi-Dopazo; Jose M Abadal; Juan Pulido; Eduardo Eyheremendy; Elena Lonjedo; Guadalupe Guerrero; Carolina Serrano-Casorran; Pedro Pardo; Micaela Arrieta; Jose Rodriguez-Gomez; Cristina Bonastre; George Behrens; Carlos Lanciego; Hector Ferral; Mariano Magallanes; Santiago Mendez; Mercedes Perez; Jimena Gonzalez-Nieto; William T Kuo; David Jimenez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.