PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a modified low-profile hangman technique. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all filter retrieval procedures performed at a major trauma center, from 2012 to 2019. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, device type, device dwell time, device tilt, embedded hook, success of device retrieval, evidence of caval injury and occurrence of complications. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019 there were 473 filter retrieval attempts. An advanced technique was documented in 66 (14%). The low-profile hangman technique alone was documented in 23 procedures (5% of all procedures, 35% of advanced technique procedures). Average screening time was 28 minutes. At the time of retrieval attempt, 9 patients (41%) were anticoagulated. The hangman technique was employed as isolated maneuver in 23 patients and was successful on initial attempt in 22 cases (96%). The average dwell time of filters retrieved by the hangman technique was 228 days (range, 40-903 days; median, 196 days). No procedure-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The retrieval of IVC filters is an important part of offering an IVC filter service. Advanced techniques to retrieve caval filters are multiple, and the risk of complications is increased in these cases. We demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a new modified and lower-profile hangman technique. This new technique could be performed with only an 11 French venous access sheath using off-the-shelf equipment and it remains a cost-effective approach to complex filter retrieval.
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a modified low-profile hangman technique. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all filter retrieval procedures performed at a major trauma center, from 2012 to 2019. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, device type, device dwell time, device tilt, embedded hook, success of device retrieval, evidence of caval injury and occurrence of complications. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2019 there were 473 filter retrieval attempts. An advanced technique was documented in 66 (14%). The low-profile hangman technique alone was documented in 23 procedures (5% of all procedures, 35% of advanced technique procedures). Average screening time was 28 minutes. At the time of retrieval attempt, 9 patients (41%) were anticoagulated. The hangman technique was employed as isolated maneuver in 23 patients and was successful on initial attempt in 22 cases (96%). The average dwell time of filters retrieved by the hangman technique was 228 days (range, 40-903 days; median, 196 days). No procedure-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The retrieval of IVC filters is an important part of offering an IVC filter service. Advanced techniques to retrieve caval filters are multiple, and the risk of complications is increased in these cases. We demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a new modified and lower-profile hangman technique. This new technique could be performed with only an 11 French venous access sheath using off-the-shelf equipment and it remains a cost-effective approach to complex filter retrieval.
Authors: Rahil H Kassamali; Kateryna Burlak; Jonathan T L Lee; Georgina Aberdein; George Harisis; Gerard S Goh; Helen Kavnoudias; Warren Clements Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: S William Stavropoulos; Robert G Dixon; Charles T Burke; Joseph M Stavas; Anand Shah; Richard D Shlansky-Goldberg; Scott O Trerotola Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Orla Doody; Geertje Noë; Mark F Given; Peter T Foley; Stuart M Lyon Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: William T Kuo; Justin I Odegaard; John D Louie; Daniel Y Sze; Kamil Unver; Nishita Kothary; Jarrett K Rosenberg; David M Hovsepian; Gloria L Hwang; Lawrence V Hofmann Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: William Nicholson; W Jay Nicholson; Paul Tolerico; Bradley Taylor; Samuel Solomon; Thomas Schryver; Kevin McCullum; Howard Goldberg; James Mills; Brian Schuler; Larry Shears; Lyle Siddoway; Nikhilesh Agarwal; Christopher Tuohy Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-08-09
Authors: Hyun S Kim; Mark J Young; Anand K Narayan; Kelvin Hong; Robert P Liddell; Michael B Streiff Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Miguel A De Gregorio; Jose A Guirola; Sergio Sierre; Jose Urbano; Juan Jose Ciampi-Dopazo; Jose M Abadal; Juan Pulido; Eduardo Eyheremendy; Elena Lonjedo; Guadalupe Guerrero; Carolina Serrano-Casorran; Pedro Pardo; Micaela Arrieta; Jose Rodriguez-Gomez; Cristina Bonastre; George Behrens; Carlos Lanciego; Hector Ferral; Mariano Magallanes; Santiago Mendez; Mercedes Perez; Jimena Gonzalez-Nieto; William T Kuo; David Jimenez Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 4.241