BACKGROUND: Epidemiological evidence supports a relationship between vitamin D and mental well-being, although evidence from large-scale placebo-controlled intervention trials is lacking. AIMS: To examine if vitamin D supplementation has a beneficial effect on mood in community-dwelling older women; if a single annual large dose of vitamin D has a role in the prevention of depressive symptoms; and if there is an association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and mental health. METHOD: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of women aged 70 or older (the Vital D Study: ISRCTN83409867 and ACTR12605000658617). Participants were randomly assigned to receive 500 000 IU vitamin D(3) (cholecalciferol) orally or placebo every autumn/winter for 3-5 consecutive years. The tools utilised at various time points were the General Health Questionnaire, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey, the Patient Global Impression-Improvement scale and the WHO Well-Being Index. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were measured in a subset of 102 participants. RESULTS: In this non-clinical population, no significant differences between the vitamin D and placebo groups were detected in any of the measured outcomes of mental health. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in the vitamin D group were 41% higher than the placebo group 12 months following their annual dose. Despite this difference, scores from the questionnaires did not differ. Furthermore, there was no interaction between those on antidepressant/anxiety medication at baseline and the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of improvement in indices of mental well-being in the vitamin D group does not support the hypothesis that an annual high dose of vitamin D(3) is a practical intervention to prevent depressive symptoms in older community-dwelling women.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological evidence supports a relationship between vitamin D and mental well-being, although evidence from large-scale placebo-controlled intervention trials is lacking. AIMS: To examine if vitamin D supplementation has a beneficial effect on mood in community-dwelling older women; if a single annual large dose of vitamin D has a role in the prevention of depressive symptoms; and if there is an association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and mental health. METHOD: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of women aged 70 or older (the Vital D Study: ISRCTN83409867 and ACTR12605000658617). Participants were randomly assigned to receive 500 000 IU vitamin D(3) (cholecalciferol) orally or placebo every autumn/winter for 3-5 consecutive years. The tools utilised at various time points were the General Health Questionnaire, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey, the Patient Global Impression-Improvement scale and the WHO Well-Being Index. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were measured in a subset of 102 participants. RESULTS: In this non-clinical population, no significant differences between the vitamin D and placebo groups were detected in any of the measured outcomes of mental health. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in the vitamin D group were 41% higher than the placebo group 12 months following their annual dose. Despite this difference, scores from the questionnaires did not differ. Furthermore, there was no interaction between those on antidepressant/anxiety medication at baseline and the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of improvement in indices of mental well-being in the vitamin D group does not support the hypothesis that an annual high dose of vitamin D(3) is a practical intervention to prevent depressive symptoms in older community-dwelling women.
Authors: L L N Husemoen; J F Ebstrup; E L Mortensen; P Schwarz; T Skaaby; B H Thuesen; T Jørgensen; A Linneberg Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Olivia I Okereke; Charles F Reynolds; David Mischoulon; Grace Chang; Nancy R Cook; Trisha Copeland; Georgina Friedenberg; Julie E Buring; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Malcolm P Forbes; Adrienne O'Neil; Melissa Lane; Bruno Agustini; Nick Myles; Michael Berk Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: G Michael Allan; Lynda Cranston; Adrienne Lindblad; James McCormack; Michael R Kolber; Scott Garrison; Christina Korownyk Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Olivia I Okereke; Charles F Reynolds; David Mischoulon; Grace Chang; Chirag M Vyas; Nancy R Cook; Alison Weinberg; Vadim Bubes; Trisha Copeland; Georgina Friedenberg; I-Min Lee; Julie E Buring; JoAnn E Manson Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 56.272