Literature DB >> 21525048

Female but not male dogs respond to a size constancy violation.

Corsin A Müller1, Christina Mayer, Sebastian Dörrenberg, Ludwig Huber, Friederike Range.   

Abstract

Differences between sexes in cognitive processes are widespread in humans and permeate many, if not most, cognitive domains. In animal cognition research, however, possible sex differences are still often neglected. Here, we provide striking evidence for a sex-specific response in an object permanence task in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Female dogs responded with significantly increased looking times to a violation of expectancy--a ball 'magically' changing size while temporarily occluded. By contrast, male dogs, irrespective of their neuter status, did not respond to the size constancy violation. These results indicate that sex differences in basic cognitive processes may extend to mammals in general, and call for increased consideration of possible sex effects when analysing and interpreting data in animal cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21525048      PMCID: PMC3169075          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  18 in total

Review 1.  Social learning in animals: sex differences and neurobiological analysis.

Authors:  E Choleris; M Kavaliers
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count?

Authors:  Rebecca E West; Robert J Young
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Sex differences in chimpanzees' use of sticks as play objects resemble those of children.

Authors:  Sonya M Kahlenberg; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation.

Authors:  Gregor Schöner; Esther Thelen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Interpreting infant looking: the event set x event set design.

Authors:  R S Bogartz; J L Shinskey; C J Speaker
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1997-05

6.  Do dogs (Canis familiaris) understand invisible displacement?

Authors:  Emma Collier-Baker; Joanne M Davis; Thomas Suddendorf
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Foraging innovation in the guppy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Invisible displacement understanding in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): the role of visual cues in search behavior.

Authors:  Sylvain Fiset; Valérie Leblanc
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 9.  Sex differences in learning processes of classical and operant conditioning.

Authors:  Christina Dalla; Tracey J Shors
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-09

10.  Comparing dogs and great apes in their ability to visually track object transpositions.

Authors:  Eveline F Rooijakkers; Juliane Kaminski; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  21 in total

1.  Age influences domestic dog cognitive performance independent of average breed lifespan.

Authors:  Marina M Watowich; Evan L MacLean; Brian Hare; Josep Call; Juliane Kaminski; Ádám Miklósi; Noah Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Individual recognition and long-term memory of inanimate interactive agents and humans in dogs.

Authors:  Judit Abdai; Dalma Bartus; Sylvain Kraus; Zsuzsanna Gedai; Beatrix Laczi; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Recognition of rotated objects and cognitive offloading in dogs.

Authors:  Lucrezia Lonardo; Elisabetta Versace; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-01-26

5.  Dogs' ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience.

Authors:  Miina Lõoke; Orsolya Kanizsar; Cécile Guérineau; Paolo Mongillo; Lieta Marinelli
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Assessing sex differences in behavioural flexibility in an endangered bird species: the Southern ground-hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri).

Authors:  Samara Danel; Nancy Rebout; Lucy Kemp
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 2.899

7.  Sex, skull length, breed, and age predict how dogs look at faces of humans and conspecifics.

Authors:  Zsófia Bognár; Ivaylo B Iotchev; Enikő Kubinyi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  The use of a displacement device negatively affects the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) in visible object displacement tasks.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Stefanie Riemer; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Guppies Show Behavioural but Not Cognitive Sex Differences in a Novel Object Recognition Test.

Authors:  Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Marco Dadda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Investigating Empathy-Like Responding to Conspecifics' Distress in Pet Dogs.

Authors:  Mylene Quervel-Chaumette; Viola Faerber; Tamás Faragó; Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Friederike Range
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.