Literature DB >> 17165041

Invisible displacement understanding in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): the role of visual cues in search behavior.

Sylvain Fiset1, Valérie Leblanc.   

Abstract

Recently, (Collier-Baker E, Davis JM, Suddendorf T (2004) J Comp Psychol 118:421-433) suggested that domestic dogs do not understand invisible displacements. In the present study, we further investigated the hypothesis that the search behavior of domestic dogs in invisible displacements is guided by various visual cues inherent to the task rather than by mental representation of an object's past trajectory. Specifically, we examined the role of the experimenter as a function of the final position of the displacement device in the search behavior of domestic dogs. Visible and invisible displacement problems were administered to dogs (N = 11) under two conditions. In the Visible-experimenter condition, the experimenter was visible whereas in the Concealed-experimenter condition, the experimenter was visibly occluded behind a large rigid barrier. Our data supported the conclusion that dogs do not understand invisible displacements but primarily search as a function of the final position of the displacement device and, to a lesser extent, the position of the experimenter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17165041     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0060-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  15 in total

1.  Double invisible displacement understanding in orangutans: testing in non-locomotor and locomotor space.

Authors:  Suma Mallavarapu; Tara S Stoinski; Bonnie M Perdue; Terry L Maple
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Dogs are able to solve a means-end task.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Marleen Hentrup; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Ontogeny of object permanence in a non-storing corvid species, the jackdaw (Corvus monedula).

Authors:  Dorottya Júlia Ujfalussy; Ádám Miklósi; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Domestication has not affected the understanding of means-end connections in dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Helene Möslinger; Zs Virányi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Object permanence in dogs: invisible displacement in a rotation task.

Authors:  Holly C Miller; Cassie D Gipson; Aubrey Vaughan; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

6.  What do dogs know about hidden objects?

Authors:  Holly C Miller; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Female but not male dogs respond to a size constancy violation.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Christina Mayer; Sebastian Dörrenberg; Ludwig Huber; Friederike Range
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  The use of a displacement device negatively affects the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) in visible object displacement tasks.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Stefanie Riemer; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Prospective object search in dogs: mixed evidence for knowledge of What and Where.

Authors:  Juliane Kaminski; Julia Fischer; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Comparing dogs and great apes in their ability to visually track object transpositions.

Authors:  Eveline F Rooijakkers; Juliane Kaminski; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.