Literature DB >> 21524442

Impact of renal function before mechanical circulatory support on posttransplant renal outcomes.

Madhurmeet Singh1, Michael Shullo, Robert L Kormos, Kathleen Lockard, Rachelle Zomak, Marc A Simon, Christian Bermudez, Jay Bhama, Dennis McNamara, Yoshiya Toyoda, Jeffrey J Teuteberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is common before mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Mechanical circulatory support frequently improves renal function, but the impact of pre-MCS renal dysfunction on renal function after cardiac transplantation (CTX) is unknown.
METHODS: Patients with MCS from January 1995 until April 2008 at a single center were included if their MCS duration was at least 60 days and they underwent successful CTX. Patients were followed for 1 year after CTX.
RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included in the study. Mechanical circulatory support was biventricular assist device in 28% and left ventricular assist device in 72% (continuous flow left ventricular assist device, 14%). Mean duration of MCS was 124 days. Patients were grouped according to tertiles of pre-MCS creatinine clearance (CrCl): group 1, CrCl less than 45 mL/min; group 2, CrCl between 45 and 65 mL/min inclusive; and group 3, CrCl more than 65 mL/min. Group 3 had the best renal outcomes both after MCS and 1 year after CTX. Regardless of group, patients who had a CrCl of at least 60 mL/min before CTX had similar 1-year posttransplant CrCl (55 versus 53 versus 56 mL/min for groups 1 through 3, respectively; not significantly different). However, the ability to achieve this level of renal function after MCS was less likely in those with the worst renal function before the initiation of MCS (53% versus 74% versus 90% for groups 1 through 3, respectively; p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of MCS leads to improvements in renal function in patients after MCS. However, the renal outcomes after CTX seem to be more dependent on the level of renal function achieved during MCS than on the level of renal function before MCS.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21524442     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

Review 1.  Renal dysfunction and chronic mechanical circulatory support: from patient selection to long-term management and prognosis.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Jeffrey M Testani; Jennifer L Cook
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Hemodynamic Predictors of Renal Function After Pediatric Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Chiu-Yu Chen; Maria E Montez-Rath; Lindsay J May; Katsuhide Maeda; Seth A Hollander; David N Rosenthal; Catherine D Krawczeski; Scott M Sutherland
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Prevalence and prognostic importance of changes in renal function after mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Stephen E Kimmel; Steven G Coca; Mary E Putt; Mariell Jessup; Wilson W H Tang; Chirag R Parikh; Jeffrey M Testani
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 4.  Cardiorenal syndrome: pathophysiology and potential targets for clinical management.

Authors:  Parta Hatamizadeh; Gregg C Fonarow; Matthew J Budoff; Sirous Darabian; Csaba P Kovesdy; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices and the Kidney.

Authors:  Daniel W Ross; Gerin R Stevens; Rimda Wanchoo; David T Majure; Sandeep Jauhar; Harold A Fernandez; Massini Merzkani; Kenar D Jhaveri
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  The mid-term effect of left ventricular assist devices on renal functions.

Authors:  Mustafa Emre Gürcü; Özge Altaş Yerlikhan; Tanıl Özer; Atakan Erkılınç; Ece Altınay; Esin Erdem; Murat Gücün; Nural Bekiroğlu; Kaan Kırali
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 0.332

7.  Improvement in Kidney Function After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Its Influence on Thromboembolism, Hemorrhage, and Mortality.

Authors:  Brittney H Davis; Amelia K Boehme; Salpy V Pamboukian; Michael Allon; James F George; Chrisly Dillon; James K Kirklin; Jose Tallaj; Emily B Levitan; Russell Griffin; Gerald McGwin; T Mark Beasley; Nita A Limdi
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.826

Review 8.  Left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective.

Authors:  T R Tromp; N de Jonge; J A Joles
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  The influence of preoperative dialysis on survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Harveen K Lamba; Fadi I Musfee; Subhasis Chatterjee; Ajith P Nair; Andrew B Civitello; Leo Simpson; O H Frazier; George V Letsou
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 10.  Congestive nephropathy: a neglected entity? Proposal for diagnostic criteria and future perspectives.

Authors:  Faeq Husain-Syed; Hermann-Josef Gröne; Birgit Assmus; Pascal Bauer; Henning Gall; Werner Seeger; Ardeschir Ghofrani; Claudio Ronco; Horst-Walter Birk
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.