Linlin Zhang1, Li Ma, Qinghua Zhou. 1. Department of Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, #154 Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China. zllcaroline@163.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study compared the efficacy and toxicities of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of KRAS mutation status on the outcomes was also investigated. METHODS: Literature retrieval, trials selection and assessment, data collection, and statistical analysis were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2. The outcome measures were tumor response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials, comprising totally 2,912 patients, were included. Meta-analysis showed higher response rate (RR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.14-3.26) and significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.95) in cetuximab-chemotherapy groups versus chemotherapy groups. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding overall survival (OS; HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05). In wild-type KRAS patients, treatment with cetuximab plus chemotherapy significantly increased response rate (RR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.20-1.73) and improved PFS (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.84), as compared with chemotherapy groups, but not for OS (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.11). In mutant KRAS patients, there was no significant difference between those treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy and those with chemotherapy alone regarding response rate (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61-1.08), PFS (HR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.81-2.31), and OS (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.44). The risk of grade 3/4 rash, diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue was significantly increased in cetuximab combination groups as compared with chemotherapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cetuximab in addition to chemotherapy was a valid alternative for patients with mCRC. Benefit of cetuximab was only limited to patients with wild-type KRAS tumors.
PURPOSE: This study compared the efficacy and toxicities of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of KRAS mutation status on the outcomes was also investigated. METHODS: Literature retrieval, trials selection and assessment, data collection, and statistical analysis were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2. The outcome measures were tumor response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials, comprising totally 2,912 patients, were included. Meta-analysis showed higher response rate (RR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.14-3.26) and significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.95) in cetuximab-chemotherapy groups versus chemotherapy groups. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups regarding overall survival (OS; HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05). In wild-type KRASpatients, treatment with cetuximab plus chemotherapy significantly increased response rate (RR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.20-1.73) and improved PFS (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.84), as compared with chemotherapy groups, but not for OS (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.11). In mutant KRASpatients, there was no significant difference between those treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy and those with chemotherapy alone regarding response rate (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61-1.08), PFS (HR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.81-2.31), and OS (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.44). The risk of grade 3/4 rash, diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue was significantly increased in cetuximab combination groups as compared with chemotherapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cetuximab in addition to chemotherapy was a valid alternative for patients with mCRC. Benefit of cetuximab was only limited to patients with wild-type KRAS tumors.
Authors: Janja Ocvirk; Thomas Brodowicz; Fritz Wrba; Tudor E Ciuleanu; Galina Kurteva; Semir Beslija; Ivan Koza; Zsuzsanna Pápai; Diethelm Messinger; Ugur Yilmaz; Zsolt Faluhelyi; Suayib Yalcin; Demetris Papamichael; Miklós Wenczl; Zrinka Mrsic-Krmpotic; Einat Shacham-Shmueli; Damir Vrbanec; Regina Esser; Werner Scheithauer; Christoph C Zielinski Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: M Borner; D Koeberle; R Von Moos; P Saletti; D Rauch; V Hess; A Trojan; D Helbling; B Pestalozzi; C Caspar; T Ruhstaller; A Roth; A Kappeler; D Dietrich; D Lanz; W Mingrone Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Christos S Karapetis; John R Zalcberg; Dongsheng Tu; Heather-Jane Au; Scott R Berry; Marianne Krahn; Timothy Price; R John Simes; Niall C Tebbutt; Guy van Hazel; Rafal Wierzbicki; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 2.493