OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) with the rebound (TonoVet(®)) and applanation (TonoPen XL(®)) tonometers in beagle dogs. ANIMAL STUDIED: Both eyes of 60 clinically normal dogs were used. PROCEDURES: The IOP was measured by the TonoVet(®), followed by the TonoPen XL(®) in half of the dogs, while the other half was measured in the reverse order. All CCT measurements were performed 10 min after the use of the second tonometer. RESULTS: The mean IOP value measured by the TonoVet(®) (16.9 ± 3.7 mmHg) was significantly higher than the TonoPen XL(®) (11.6 ± 2.7 mmHg; P < 0.001). The IOP values obtained by both tonometers were correlated in the regression analysis (γ(2) = 0.4393, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the lower and upper limits of agreement between the two devices were -0.1 and +10.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean CCT was 549.7 ± 51.0 μm. There was a correlation between the IOP values obtained by the two tonometers and CCT readings in the regression analysis (TonoVet(®) : P = 0.002, TonoPen XL(®) : P = 0.035). The regression equation demonstrated that for every 100 μm increase in CCT, there was an elevation of 1 and 2 mmHg in IOP measured by the TonoPen XL(®) and TonoVet(®), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The IOP obtained by the TonoVet(®) and TonoPen XL(®) would be affected by variations in the CCT. Therefore, the CCT should be considered when interpreting IOP values measured by tonometers in dogs.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) with the rebound (TonoVet(®)) and applanation (TonoPen XL(®)) tonometers in beagle dogs. ANIMAL STUDIED: Both eyes of 60 clinically normal dogs were used. PROCEDURES: The IOP was measured by the TonoVet(®), followed by the TonoPen XL(®) in half of the dogs, while the other half was measured in the reverse order. All CCT measurements were performed 10 min after the use of the second tonometer. RESULTS: The mean IOP value measured by the TonoVet(®) (16.9 ± 3.7 mmHg) was significantly higher than the TonoPen XL(®) (11.6 ± 2.7 mmHg; P < 0.001). The IOP values obtained by both tonometers were correlated in the regression analysis (γ(2) = 0.4393, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the lower and upper limits of agreement between the two devices were -0.1 and +10.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean CCT was 549.7 ± 51.0 μm. There was a correlation between the IOP values obtained by the two tonometers and CCT readings in the regression analysis (TonoVet(®) : P = 0.002, TonoPen XL(®) : P = 0.035). The regression equation demonstrated that for every 100 μm increase in CCT, there was an elevation of 1 and 2 mmHg in IOP measured by the TonoPen XL(®) and TonoVet(®), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The IOP obtained by the TonoVet(®) and TonoPen XL(®) would be affected by variations in the CCT. Therefore, the CCT should be considered when interpreting IOP values measured by tonometers in dogs.
Authors: Eva Martín-Suárez; Carolina Molleda; Rodrigo Tardón; Alba Galán; José Gallardo; José Molleda Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Blanche D Rodrigues; Fabiano Montiani-Ferreira; Mariza Bortolini; André T Somma; András M Komáromy; Peterson Triches Dornbusch Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 1.644