Zhongxing Zhou1, Feng Gao, Huijuan Zhao, Lixin Zhang. 1. School of Precision Instrument and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China. zhouzhongxing@tju.edu.cn
Abstract
PURPOSE: Noise characterization through estimation of the noise power spectrum (NPS) is a central component of the evaluation of digital x-ray systems. Extensive works have been conducted to achieve accurate and precise measurement of NPS. One approach to improve the accuracy of the NPS measurement is to reduce the statistical variance of the NPS results by involving more data samples. However, this method is based on the assumption that the noise in a radiographic image is arising from stochastic processes. In the practical data, the artifactuals always superimpose on the stochastic noise as low-frequency background trends and prevent us from achieving accurate NPS. The purpose of this study was to investigate an appropriate background detrending technique to improve the accuracy of NPS estimation for digital x-ray systems. METHODS: In order to achieve the optimal background detrending technique for NPS estimate, four methods for artifactuals removal were quantitatively studied and compared: (1) Subtraction of a low-pass-filtered version of the image, (2) subtraction of a 2-D first-order fit to the image, (3) subtraction of a 2-D second-order polynomial fit to the image, and (4) subtracting two uniform exposure images. In addition, background trend removal was separately applied within original region of interest or its partitioned sub-blocks for all four methods. The performance of background detrending techniques was compared according to the statistical variance of the NPS results and low-frequency systematic rise suppression. RESULTS: Among four methods, subtraction of a 2-D second-order polynomial fit to the image was most effective in low-frequency systematic rise suppression and variances reduction for NPS estimate according to the authors' digital x-ray system. Subtraction of a low-pass-filtered version of the image led to NPS variance increment above low-frequency components because of the side lobe effects of frequency response of the boxcar filtering function. Subtracting two uniform exposure images obtained the worst result on the smoothness of NPS curve, although it was effective in low-frequency systematic rise suppression. Subtraction of a 2-D first-order fit to the image was also identified effective for background detrending, but it was worse than subtraction of a 2-D second-order polynomial fit to the image according to the authors' digital x-ray system. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this study, the authors verified that it is necessary and feasible to get better NPS estimate by appropriate background trend removal. Subtraction of a 2-D second-order polynomial fit to the image was the most appropriate technique for background detrending without consideration of processing time.
PURPOSE: Noise characterization through estimation of the noise power spectrum (NPS) is a central component of the evaluation of digital x-ray systems. Extensive works have been conducted to achieve accurate and precise measurement of NPS. One approach to improve the accuracy of the NPS measurement is to reduce the statistical variance of the NPS results by involving more data samples. However, this method is based on the assumption that the noise in a radiographic image is arising from stochastic processes. In the practical data, the artifactuals always superimpose on the stochastic noise as low-frequency background trends and prevent us from achieving accurate NPS. The purpose of this study was to investigate an appropriate background detrending technique to improve the accuracy of NPS estimation for digital x-ray systems. METHODS: In order to achieve the optimal background detrending technique for NPS estimate, four methods for artifactuals removal were quantitatively studied and compared: (1) Subtraction of a low-pass-filtered version of the image, (2) subtraction of a 2-D first-order fit to the image, (3) subtraction of a 2-D second-order polynomial fit to the image, and (4) subtracting two uniform exposure images. In addition, background trend removal was separately applied within original region of interest or its partitioned sub-blocks for all four methods. The performance of background detrending techniques was compared according to the statistical variance of the NPS results and low-frequency systematic rise suppression. RESULTS: Among four methods, subtraction of a 2-D second-order polynomial fit to the image was most effective in low-frequency systematic rise suppression and variances reduction for NPS estimate according to the authors' digital x-ray system. Subtraction of a low-pass-filtered version of the image led to NPS variance increment above low-frequency components because of the side lobe effects of frequency response of the boxcar filtering function. Subtracting two uniform exposure images obtained the worst result on the smoothness of NPS curve, although it was effective in low-frequency systematic rise suppression. Subtraction of a 2-D first-order fit to the image was also identified effective for background detrending, but it was worse than subtraction of a 2-D second-order polynomial fit to the image according to the authors' digital x-ray system. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this study, the authors verified that it is necessary and feasible to get better NPS estimate by appropriate background trend removal. Subtraction of a 2-D second-order polynomial fit to the image was the most appropriate technique for background detrending without consideration of processing time.