Literature DB >> 21519449

Predictive Value of the Rapid Whole Blood Agglutination D-Dimer Assay (AGEN SimpliRED) in Community Outpatients with Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis.

Julieta E Hayag, Prem P Manchanda.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: D-dimer assay has been used to screen patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Because both the predictive value and sensitivity/specificity of the test vary according to the type of assay, prevalence, and pretest probability of DVT, clinicians must know the local performance of the d-dimer assay.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of the rapid whole blood agglutination d-dimer Assay (AGEN SimpliRED) in community outpatients with suspected DVT in the Kaiser Permanente (KP) Mid-Atlantic Region.
DESIGN: Retrospective, randomized, cross-sectional review of electronic medical records of patients with suspected DVT who underwent d-dimer testing for venous thromboembolism.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 5104 patients with suspected venous thromboembolism underwent d-dimer testing using AGEN SimpliRED from April 2001 to December 2002. A total of 551 electronic medical records were reviewed, and results of d-dimer assay and compression ultrasonography were tabulated. Records were analyzed to determine later diagnosis of DVT or unexplained death occurring as late as six months after initial testing.
RESULTS: Electronic records showed a 5.3% disease prevalence. Ten patients were excluded from data analysis. A total of 129 (23.8%) patients had positive d-dimer; the positive predictive value was 20.2% (CI, 13.2% to 27%). A total of 412 (76.1%) patients had negative test results; three of these patients had DVT shown by compression ultra-sonography; negative predictive value was 99.3% (CI, 98.4% to 100%). Calculated sensitivity was 89.7%; specificity was 79.9%.
CONCLUSION: In the outpatient setting, the rapid whole blood agglutination d-dimer assay (AGEN SimpliRED) used in combination with both clinical judgment and compression ultrasonography exhibited a high negative predictive value comparable with previously reported values.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 21519449      PMCID: PMC3076977          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/04-154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  25 in total

1.  A negative SimpliRED D-dimer assay result does not exclude the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus in emergency department patients.

Authors:  S Farrell; T Hayes; M Shaw
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 2.  D-dimer testing in suspected venous thromboembolism: an update.

Authors:  H Bounameaux; P de Moerloose; A Perrier; M J Miron
Journal:  QJM       Date:  1997-07

3.  Comparison of four strategies for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N Perone; H Bounameaux; A Perrier
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Coagulation activation markers do not correlate with the clinical risk of thrombosis in pregnant women.

Authors:  T Bombeli; P Raddatz-Mueller; J Fehr
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  A Cogo; A W Lensing; M M Koopman; F Piovella; S Siragusa; P S Wells; S Villalta; H R Büller; A G Turpie; P Prandoni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-03

Review 6.  Plasma D-dimers in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  James Kelly; Anthony Rudd; Roger R Lewis; Beverley J Hunt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-04-08

Review 7.  Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative.

Authors:  C Kearon; J A Julian; T E Newman; J S Ginsberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Deep venous thrombosis: US assessment using vein compression.

Authors:  J J Cronan; G S Dorfman; F H Scola; B Schepps; J Alexander
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Plasma measurement of D-dimer as diagnostic aid in suspected venous thromboembolism: an overview.

Authors:  H Bounameaux; P de Moerloose; A Perrier; G Reber
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Withholding anticoagulation after a negative result on duplex ultrasonography for suspected symptomatic deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Scott M Stevens; C Gregory Elliott; Karen J Chan; Marlene J Egger; Kirmanj M Ahmed
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving D-dimer Positive Predictive Value for Outpatients with Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Craig M Nelson; Geary S Wright; Tom R Silbaugh; Louis J Cota
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2009

2.  An elevated D-dimer value: a burden on our patients and hospitals.

Authors:  Nitin Chopra; Pradeep Doddamreddy; Hermanjeet Grewal; Pratap C Kumar
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-01-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.