Literature DB >> 10650228

A negative SimpliRED D-dimer assay result does not exclude the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus in emergency department patients.

S Farrell1, T Hayes, M Shaw.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a negative SimpliRED D-dimer assay result excludes the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolus (PE) in emergency department patients.
METHODS: This prospective, institutional review board-approved, clinical trial enrolled consecutive adult ED patients with the suspected diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (DVT or PE). Initial ED evaluation included the SimpliRED D-dimer assay (American Diagnostica Inc, Greenwich, CT). Physicians were blinded to assay results. The diagnosis of DVT was made with positive findings on lower-extremity ultrasonography. PE was confirmed by a high-probability ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan, a positive pulmonary angiogram, or a positive finding on lower-extremity ultrasonography. A presumptive diagnosis of VTE was made in patients who had VTE at follow-up or unexplained death during the study period.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients were enrolled during the study period. Twenty-five patients were excluded from data analysis; 9 had no diagnostic testing and 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 173 patients analyzed, 57 (33%) had VTE-16 of 48 evaluated for DVT and 41 of 125 for suspected PE. The SimpliRED assay had a sensitivity of 65% and a negative predictive value of 81% for detection of VTE. In patients evaluated for DVT alone, the sensitivity was 56% and the negative predictive value was 77%. For patients with suspected PE, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were 68% and 83%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to earlier reports on the SimpliRED D-dimer assay, a negative result failed to exclude the diagnosis of VTE in our ED population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10650228     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70130-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of fibrin D-dimer testing in emergency medicine.

Authors:  A Wakai; A Gleeson; D Winter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  D-dimer testing: advantages and limitations in emergency medicine for managing acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sergio Siragusa
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Massive pulmonary embolus with hemodynamic compromise: therapeutic options.

Authors:  Derek G Lohan; Carmel G Cronin; Conor P Meehan; Stephen T Kee; Michael D Dake; Ian R Davidson; Gerard J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18

4.  When is a computed tomography angiogram necessary to rule out pulmonary embolus in the emergency department?

Authors:  Joel Handler
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Tonya L Fancher; Richard H White; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-21

6.  Predictive Value of the Rapid Whole Blood Agglutination D-Dimer Assay (AGEN SimpliRED) in Community Outpatients with Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis.

Authors:  Julieta E Hayag; Prem P Manchanda
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2006

7.  Unsuspected pulmonary embolism in observation unit patients.

Authors:  Alexander T Limkakeng; Seth W Glickman; Charles B Cairns; Abhinav Chandra
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.