Literature DB >> 21518407

Persistently autoantibody negative (PAN) type 1 diabetes mellitus in children.

Shihab Hameed1, Sian Ellard, Helen J Woodhead, Kristen A Neville, Jan L Walker, Maria E Craig, Taylor Armstrong, Liping Yu, George S Eisenbarth, Andrew T Hattersley, Charles F Verge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autoantibody-negative children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes might have unrecognized monogenic or type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: At diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (between ages 0.5 and 16.3 yr, n = 470), autoantibodies [glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), insulinoma-associated protein 2 (IA2), insulin autoantibodies (IAA), and/or islet cell antibody (ICA)] were positive (ab+) in 330 and negative in 37 (unknown in 103). Autoantibody-negative patients were retested at median diabetes duration of 3.2 yr (range 0.9-16.2) for autoantibodies (GAD, IA2, ZnT8), human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, non-fasting C-peptide, and sequencing of HNF4A, HNF1A, KCNJ11, and INS.
RESULTS: Nineteen (5% of 367) remained persistently autoantibody negative (PAN), 17 were positive on repeat testing (PORT), and 1 refused retesting. No mutations were found in PORT. One PAN was heterozygous for P112L mutation in HNF1A and transferred from insulin to oral gliclazide. Another PAN transferred to metformin and the diagnosis was revised to type 2 diabetes. The remaining 17 PAN were indistinguishable from the ab+ group by clinical characteristics. HLA genotype was at high risk for type 1 diabetes in 82% of remaining PAN and 100% of PORT. After excluding patients with diabetes duration <1 yr, C-peptide was detectable more frequently in the remaining PAN (7/16) and PORT (6/17) than in a random selection of ab+ (3/28, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes should be reevaluated in PAN patients, because a subset has monogenic or type 2 diabetes. The remaining PAN have relatively preserved C-peptide compared with ab+, suggesting slower β-cell destruction, but a very high frequency of diabetogenic HLA, implying that type 1B (idiopathic) diabetes is rare.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21518407     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00681.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes        ISSN: 1399-543X            Impact factor:   4.866


  20 in total

1.  Detection and analysis of glucose metabolism-related genes in childhood diabetes using targeted next-generation sequencing: In pediatric population-a hospital-based study.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Wang; Fengyun Wang; Haiying Wu; Xiuli Chen; Rongrong Xie; Ting Chen; Hui Sun; Dandan Zhang; Linqi Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Potential Applications of Gliclazide in Treating Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Formulation with Bile Acids and Probiotics.

Authors:  Momir Mikov; Maja Đanić; Nebojša Pavlović; Bojan Stanimirov; Svetlana Goločorbin-Kon; Karmen Stankov; Hani Al-Salami
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 3.  Genetics of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Maria J Redondo; Andrea K Steck; Alberto Pugliese
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.866

4.  Molecular genetic testing of patients with monogenic diabetes and hyperinsulinism.

Authors:  James T Bennett; Valeria Vasta; Min Zhang; Jaya Narayanan; Peter Gerrits; Si Houn Hahn
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 4.797

5.  Sulfonylurea challenge test in subjects diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Maria S Remedi; Mareen Thomas; Colin G Nichols; Bess A Marshall
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.866

6.  Comparison of autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative pediatric participants enrolled in the T1D Exchange clinic registry.

Authors:  Andrea Gerard-Gonzalez; Stephen E Gitelman; Peiyao Cheng; Stephanie N Dubose; Kellee M Miller; Beth A Olson; Maria J Redondo; Andrea K Steck; Roy W Beck
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.006

7.  Systematic Population Screening, Using Biomarkers and Genetic Testing, Identifies 2.5% of the U.K. Pediatric Diabetes Population With Monogenic Diabetes.

Authors:  Maggie Shepherd; Beverley Shields; Suzanne Hammersley; Michelle Hudson; Timothy J McDonald; Kevin Colclough; Richard A Oram; Bridget Knight; Christopher Hyde; Julian Cox; Katherine Mallam; Christopher Moudiotis; Rebecca Smith; Barbara Fraser; Simon Robertson; Stephen Greene; Sian Ellard; Ewan R Pearson; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Prevalence and special clinical and biochemical characteristics of familial type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus in pediatric patients in a tertiary care setting.

Authors:  Angham AlMutair; Norah AlSabty; Hala AlNuaim; Rawan Al Hamdan; Afaf Moukaddem
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 9.  Monogenic Diabetes: From Genetic Insights to Population-Based Precision in Care. Reflections From a Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum.

Authors:  Matthew C Riddle; Louis H Philipson; Stephen S Rich; Annelie Carlsson; Paul W Franks; Siri Atma W Greeley; John J Nolan; Ewan R Pearson; Philip S Zeitler; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Linkage Analysis of Genomic Regions Contributing to the Expression of Type 1 Diabetes Microvascular Complications and Interaction with HLA.

Authors:  Ettie M Lipner; Yaron Tomer; Janelle A Noble; Maria C Monti; John T Lonsdale; Barbara Corso; David A Greenberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 4.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.