Literature DB >> 21517834

The relationship between low back magnetic resonance imaging, surgery, and spending: impact of physician self-referral status.

Jacqueline Baras Shreibati1, Laurence C Baker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and receipt of surgery for patients with low back pain. DATA SOURCES: Medicare claims for a 20 percent sample of beneficiaries from 1998 to 2005. STUDY
DESIGN: We identify nonradiologist physicians who appear to begin self-referral arrangements for MRI between 1999 and 2005, as well as their patients who have a new episode of low back pain care during this time. We focus on regression models that identify the relationship between receipt of MRI and subsequent use of back surgery and health care spending. Receipt of MRI may be endogenous, so we use physician acquisition of MRI as an instrument for receipt of MRI. The models adjust for demographic and socioeconomic covariates as well as month, year, and physician fixed effects. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We include traditional, fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with a visit to an orthopedist or primary care physician for nonspecific low back pain, and no claims for low back pain in the year prior. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: In the first stage, acquisition of MRI equipment is a strongly correlated with patients receiving MRI scans. Among patients of orthopedists, receipt of an MRI scan increases the probability of having surgery by 34 percentage points. Among patients of primary care physicians, receiving a low back MRI is not statistically significantly associated with subsequent surgery receipt.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthopedists and primary care physicians who begin billing for the performance of MRI procedures, rather than referring patients outside of their practice for MRI, appear to change their practice patterns such that they use more MRI for their patients with low back pain. These increases in MRI use appear to lead to increases in low back surgery receipt and health care spending among patients of orthopedic surgeons, but not of primary care physicians. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21517834      PMCID: PMC3207182          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01265.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

1.  Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice--a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians.

Authors:  B J Hillman; C A Joseph; M R Mabry; J H Sunshine; S D Kennedy; M Noether
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists' private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians.

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Effect of on-site facilities on use of diagnostic radiology by non-radiologists.

Authors:  S E Radecki; J P Steele
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. Terrific test or tar baby?

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; William Hollingworth; Brook Martin; Scott S Emerson; Darryl T Gray; Steven Overman; David Robinson; Thomas Staiger; Frank Wessbecher; Sean D Sullivan; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Physicians' utilization and charges for outpatient diagnostic imaging in a Medicare population.

Authors:  B J Hillman; G T Olson; P E Griffith; J H Sunshine; C A Joseph; S D Kennedy; W R Nelson; L B Bernhardt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain care for Medicare patients.

Authors:  Jacqueline D Baras; Laurence C Baker
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 8.  Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Low back pain: influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome--multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Adrian M Grant; Maureen G C Gillan; Luke D Vale; Marion K Campbell; Neil W Scott; David J Knight; Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Robert D Herbert; Chris G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09
View more
  12 in total

1.  Self-referral in neuroradiology.

Authors:  D Seidenwurm
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The catastrophization effects of an MRI report on the patient and surgeon and the benefits of 'clinical reporting': results from an RCT and blinded trials.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; S Dilip Chand Raja; Bhari Thippeswamy Pushpa; Kumar Behera Ananda; Shetty Ajoy Prasad; Mugesh Kanna Rishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of Physical Therapy Following Total Knee Replacement Surgery: Implications of Orthopedic Surgeons' Ownership of Physical Therapy Services.

Authors:  Jean M Mitchell; James D Reschovsky; Elizabeth Anne Reicherter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Environmental causes of breast cancer and radiation from medical imaging: findings from the Institute of Medicine report.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-09

5.  Lumbar MR imaging and reporting epidemiology: do epidemiologic data in reports affect clinical management?

Authors:  Brendan J McCullough; Germaine R Johnson; Brook I Martin; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Vertical Integration Versus Physician Owners: Trends in Practice Structure Among Breast Cancer Surgeons.

Authors:  Jean M Mitchell; Thomas DeLeire
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Iatrogenic consequences of early magnetic resonance imaging in acute, work-related, disabling low back pain.

Authors:  Barbara S Webster; Ann Z Bauer; YoonSun Choi; Manuel Cifuentes; Glenn S Pransky
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Evaluation of a Program for Improving Advanced Imaging Interpretation.

Authors:  Adam C Powell; James W Long; Erin M Kren; Amit K Gupta; David C Levin
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  The cascade of medical services and associated longitudinal costs due to nonadherent magnetic resonance imaging for low back pain.

Authors:  Barbara S Webster; YoonSun Choi; Ann Z Bauer; Manuel Cifuentes; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Comparison of Anesthesia Times and Billing Patterns by Anesthesia Practitioners.

Authors:  Eric C Sun; Richard P Dutton; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.