Literature DB >> 2233949

Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice--a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians.

B J Hillman1, C A Joseph, M R Mabry, J H Sunshine, S D Kennedy, M Noether.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess possible differences in physicians' practices with respect to diagnostic imaging, we compared the frequency and costs of imaging examinations as performed by primary physicians who used imaging equipment in their offices (self-referring) and as ordered by physicians who always referred patients to radiologists (radiologist-referring).
METHODS: Using a large, private insurance-claims data base, we analyzed 65,517 episodes of outpatient care by 6419 physicians for acute upper respiratory symptoms, pregnancy, low back pain, or (in men) difficulty urinating. The respective imaging procedures studied were chest radiography, obstetrical ultrasonography, radiography of the lumbar spine, and excretory urography, cystography, or ultrasonography.
RESULTS: For all four clinical presentations, the self-referring physicians obtained imaging examinations 4.0 to 4.5 times more often than the radiologist-referring physicians (P less than 0.0001 for all four). For chest radiography, obstetrical ultrasonography, and lumbar spine radiography, the self-referring physicians charged significantly more than the radiologists for imaging examinations of similar complexity (P less than 0.0001 for all three). The combination of more frequent imaging and higher charges resulted in mean imaging charges per episode of care that were 4.4 to 7.5 times higher for the self-referring physicians (P less than 0.0001). These results were confirmed in a separate analysis that controlled for the specialty of the physician.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians who do not refer their patients to radiologists for medical imaging use imaging examinations more frequently than do physicians who refer their patients to radiologists, and the charges are usually higher when the imaging is done by the self-referring physician. From our results it is not possible to determine which group of physicians uses imaging more appropriately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2233949     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199012063232306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  47 in total

1.  Conflict, what conflict?

Authors:  M S Wilkes
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-01

2.  Managed care and ethical conflicts: anything new?

Authors:  C Meyers
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Laboratory test ordering at physician offices with and without on-site laboratories.

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Alex D Federman; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Physician entrepreneurs, self-referral, and conflicts of interest: an overview.

Authors:  David M Zientek
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-06

5.  Challenges and strategies in the provision of high-quality nuclear cardiology imaging services in office-based cardiology practice.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gregory S Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Unregulated private markets for health care in Canada? Rules of professional misconduct, physician kickbacks and physician self-referral.

Authors:  Sujit Choudhry; Niteesh K Choudhry; Adalsteinn D Brown
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Utilization rates of neuroradiology across neuroscience specialties in the private office setting: who owns or leases the scanners on which studies are performed?

Authors:  L S Babiarz; D M Yousem; L Parker; D C Levin; V Rao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  The federal government's oversight of CT safety: regulatory possibilities.

Authors:  H Benjamin Harvey; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Health policy: if you don't know where you're going, any road will take you.

Authors:  H Sultz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  New business for ethics committees.

Authors:  S H Miles
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.