Literature DB >> 21517183

Effects of emotion and age on performance during a think/no-think memory task.

Brendan D Murray1, Keely A Muscatell, Elizabeth A Kensinger.   

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that young adults can voluntarily suppress information from memory when directed to. After learning novel word pairings to criterion, participants are shown individual words and instructed either to "think" about the associated word, or to put it out of mind entirely ("no-think"). When given a surprise cued recall test, participants typically show impaired recall for no-think words relative to think or "control" (un-manipulated) words. The present study investigated whether this controlled suppression effect persists in an aged population, and examined how the emotionality of the to-be-suppressed word affects suppression ability. Data from four experiments using the think/no-think task demonstrate that older and younger adults can suppress information when directed to (Experiment 1), and the age groups do not differ significantly in this ability. Experiments 2 through 4 demonstrate that both age groups can suppress words that are emotional (positive or negative valence) or neutral. The suppression effect also persists even if participants are tested using independent probe words that are semantically related to the target words but were not the studied cue words (Experiments 3 and 4). These data suggest that the cognitive functioning necessary to suppress information from memory is present in older adulthood, and that both emotional and neutral information can be successfully suppressed from memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21517183      PMCID: PMC3192292          DOI: 10.1037/a0023214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  52 in total

1.  Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control.

Authors:  M C Anderson; C Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory.

Authors:  S Hamann
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Older adults encode--but do not always use--perceptual details: intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments.

Authors:  Wilma Koutstaal
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

4.  Inhibitory deficits in older adults: list-method directed forgetting revisited.

Authors:  Martina Zellner; Karl-Heinz Bäuml
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Prefrontal regions orchestrate suppression of emotional memories via a two-phase process.

Authors:  Brendan E Depue; Tim Curran; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Inhibitory control of memory in normal ageing: dissociation between impaired intentional and preserved unintentional processes.

Authors:  Fabienne Collette; Sophie Germain; Michaël Hogge; Martial Van der Linden
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2008-12-22

7.  Directed forgetting and aging: the role of retrieval processes, processing speed, and proactive interference.

Authors:  Michaël Hogge; Stéphane Adam; Fabienne Collette
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2008-07

8.  An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm.

Authors:  Tracy D Tomlinson; David E Huber; Cory A Rieth; Eddy J Davelaar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Age differences in encoding specificity.

Authors:  J T Puglisi; D C Park; A D Smith; W N Dudley
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1988-11

10.  The moderating effects of stimulus valence and arousal on memory suppression.

Authors:  Brian P Marx; Peter J Marshall; Frank Castro
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-04
View more
  14 in total

1.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  The representational consequences of intentional forgetting: Impairments to both the probability and fidelity of long-term memory.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Michael A Lawrence; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01

3.  Older adults can suppress unwanted memories when given an appropriate strategy.

Authors:  Brendan D Murray; Michael C Anderson; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-01-19

4.  Parallel Regulation of Memory and Emotion Supports the Suppression of Intrusive Memories.

Authors:  Pierre Gagnepain; Justin Hulbert; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  What doesn't kill you makes you stronger: Psychological trauma and its relationship to enhanced memory control.

Authors:  Justin C Hulbert; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-07-19

6.  Aging and the prevalence of 'ironic' action errors under avoidant instruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Potter; Madeleine A Grealy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Memory suppression can help people "unlearn" behavioral responses--but only for nonemotional memories.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Christof Kuhbandner; Mara Mather; Reinhard Pekrun
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

8.  Strength of Coupling within a mnemonic control network differentiates those who can and cannot suppress memory retrieval.

Authors:  Pedro M Paz-Alonso; Silvia A Bunge; Michael C Anderson; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Emotions shape memory suppression in trait anxiety.

Authors:  Tessa Marzi; Antonio Regina; Stefania Righi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-03

Review 10.  Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting.

Authors:  Michael C Anderson; Simon Hanslmayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.