Literature DB >> 18410194

The moderating effects of stimulus valence and arousal on memory suppression.

Brian P Marx1, Peter J Marshall, Frank Castro.   

Abstract

This study examined the separate and combined effects of stimulus valence and arousal on retrieval inhibition. Participants performed Anderson and Green's (2001) memory suppression task with stimuli varying across dimensions of valence and arousal. Memory was tested through free and cued recall as well as speeded recognition. Results showed that both stimulus valence and arousal influenced the extent to which participants successfully inhibited retrieval, but not in the ways anticipated. Specifically, the strongest inhibition effects were for highly arousing, pleasant words. In addition, unpleasant stimuli that were suppressed were better recalled during both cued and free-recall tasks than pleasant stimuli that were suppressed. Across all tests of memory performance, there were no significant differences between the experimental conditions for highly arousing, unpleasant words. The implications of these findings are discussed. (Copyright) 2008 APA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18410194     DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  9 in total

1.  Effects of emotion and age on performance during a think/no-think memory task.

Authors:  Brendan D Murray; Keely A Muscatell; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-04-25

2.  ERP dynamics underlying successful directed forgetting of neutral but not negative pictures.

Authors:  Anne Hauswald; Hannah Schulz; Todor Iordanov; Johanna Kissler
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  The neural correlates of attempting to suppress negative versus neutral memories.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Karin H James
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Do Not Respond! Doing the Think/No-Think and Go/No-Go Tasks Concurrently Leads to Memory Impairment of Unpleasant Items during Later Recall.

Authors:  Cornelia Herbert; Stefan Sütterlin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-01

5.  Intentional suppression can lead to a reduction of memory strength: behavioral and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  Gerd T Waldhauser; Magnus Lindgren; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-16

6.  Images from a jointly-arousing collective ritual reveal affective polarization.

Authors:  Joseph A Bulbulia; Dimitris Xygalatas; Uffe Schjoedt; Sabela Fondevila; Chris G Sibley; Ivana Konvalinka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-24

7.  Successfully controlling intrusive memories is harder when control must be sustained.

Authors:  Kevin van Schie; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2017-02-21

8.  Memory suppression can help people "unlearn" behavioral responses--but only for nonemotional memories.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Christof Kuhbandner; Mara Mather; Reinhard Pekrun
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

9.  Emotions shape memory suppression in trait anxiety.

Authors:  Tessa Marzi; Antonio Regina; Stefania Righi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.