Literature DB >> 3183310

Age differences in encoding specificity.

J T Puglisi1, D C Park, A D Smith, W N Dudley.   

Abstract

In two experiments (one under full attention, the other under divided attention), old and young adults were presented with a cued recall task in an encoding specificity paradigm. Targets and associated cues were either pictures or matched words, and there was either a strong or weak semantic relationship between targets and cues. Additionally, cues presented at recall were either the same as or different from those presented at encoding, resulting in four encoding cue--retrieval cue combinations: (a) strong encoding cue and (same) strong retrieval cue; (b) weak encoding cue and (same) weak retrieval cue; (c) weak encoding cue and (different) strong retrieval cue; (d) strong encoding cue and (different) weak retrieval cue. For the most part, the results revealed strong encoding specificity effects for both age groups, as both old and young participants recalled more when the same cues were presented at encoding and retrieval than when different cues were presented. However, when elderly participants received verbal cues under divided attention conditions, evidence for general encoding rather than encoding specificity occurred. Results are discussed in terms of both the encoding specificity principle as well as a more process-oriented interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3183310     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/43.6.p145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  10 in total

1.  Effects of emotion and age on performance during a think/no-think memory task.

Authors:  Brendan D Murray; Keely A Muscatell; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-04-25

2.  Semantic context influences memory for verbs more than memory for nouns.

Authors:  Alan W Kersten; Julie L Earles
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

3.  Age-related differences in the specificity of verbal encoding.

Authors:  A Micco; M E Masson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

4.  Contextual interference in recognition memory with age.

Authors:  Angela H Gutchess; Andrew Hebrank; Bradley P Sutton; Eric Leshikar; Michael W L Chee; Jiat Chow Tan; Joshua O S Goh; Denise C Park
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Feature memory and binding in young and older adults.

Authors:  B L Chalfonte; M K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

6.  Knowing but not remembering: adult age differences in recollective experience.

Authors:  T Mäntylä
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

7.  Age trajectories of functional activation under conditions of low and high processing demands: an adult lifespan fMRI study of the aging brain.

Authors:  Kristen M Kennedy; Karen M Rodrigue; Gérard N Bischof; Andrew C Hebrank; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Denise C Park
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  When does prior knowledge disproportionately benefit older adults' memory?

Authors:  Stephen P Badham; Mhairi Hay; Natasha Foxon; Kiran Kaur; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-10-16

9.  Aging and memory as discrimination: Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge.

Authors:  Stephen P Badham; Marie Poirier; Navina Gandhi; Anna Hadjivassiliou; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-11

10.  Hypothesized Mechanisms Through Which Exercise May Attenuate Memory Interference.

Authors:  Lindsay K Crawford; Hong Li; Liye Zou; Gao-Xia Wei; Paul D Loprinzi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.