Literature DB >> 25150093

The value and appropriateness of positron emission tomography: an evolving tale.

Robert C Hendel1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25150093     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-014-9962-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  34 in total

1.  Gender disparity and the appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Aarti Gupta; Sarah V Tsiaras; Shira I Dunsiger; Peter L Tilkemeier
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Correlation between clinical outcomes and appropriateness grading for referral to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Angela S Koh; Jennifer L S Flores; Felix Y J Keng; Ru San Tan; Terrance S J Chua
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Utilization management of cardiovascular imaging pre-certification and appropriateness.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03

5.  Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress.

Authors:  John K Iglehart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Impact of an automated multimodality point-of-order decision support tool on rates of appropriate testing and clinical decision making for individuals with suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Jagat Narula; Leslee J Shaw; Heidi Gransar; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Applicability of the appropriate use criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in Italy: preliminary results.

Authors:  G Medolago; C Marcassa; A Alkraisheh; R Campini; A Ghilardi; R Giubbini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Inappropriate utilization of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging on the USA-Mexico border.

Authors:  Omosalewa O Lalude; Mell F Gutarra; Eduardo N Pollono; Soyoung Lee; Patrick M Tarwater
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Clinical evaluation of the appropriateness use criteria for single-photon emission-computed tomography: differences by patient population, physician specialty, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Regina S Druz; Lawrence M Phillips; Gulru Sharifova
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-02
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2015. Part 1 of 2: Plaque imaging, positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Hybrid PET- and MR-driven attenuation correction for enhanced 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG quantification in cardiovascular PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Ronan Abgral; Maria Giovanna Trivieri; Marc R Dweck; Philip M Robson; Claudia Calcagno; Gilles Boeykens; Max L Senders; Willem J M Mulder; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  A Cohort Study of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Veteran Patients Without Symptoms: Contributing Factors and Results of Testing.

Authors:  David E Winchester; Pengcheng Zhang; Manoj P Jadhav; Rebecca J Beyth
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.