Literature DB >> 10665705

Sex differences in evaluation and outcome of unstable angina.

V L Roger1, M E Farkouh, S A Weston, G S Reeder, S J Jacobsen, A R Zinsmeister, B P Yawn, S L Kopecky, S E Gabriel.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The existence of sex bias in the delivery of cardiac care is controversial, and little is known about the association between sex and delivery of care and outcomes at an early point in the diagnostic sequence, such as when patients present for the evaluation of chest pain.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that female sex is negatively associated with care delivered to and outcomes of persons diagnosed as having unstable angina.
DESIGN: Inception population-based cohort study with an average of 6 years of follow-up.
SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) in Olmsted County, Minnesota. PATIENTS: A total of 2271 Olmsted County residents (1306 men and 965 women) who presented to the ED for the first time with symptoms meeting criteria for unstable angina between 1985 and 1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of cardiac procedures within 90 days of ED visit, overall mortality, and cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and congestive heart failure), compared by sex and Agency for Health Care Policy and Research cardiovascular risk category (low, intermediate, or high).
RESULTS: Women were older (P<.001), more likely to have a history of hypertension (P = .001), and less likely to present with typical angina (P = .004) than men. Men were more likely than women to undergo noninvasive cardiac tests (relative risk [RR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.40) as well as invasive cardiac procedures (RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.51-1.97). After adjustment, male sex was associated with a 24% increase in the use of cardiac procedures. Survival of both men and women in the high and intermediate risk categories was significantly lower than expected per the general population (P<.001). Women had a worse outcome than men, but after multivariate adjustment, male sex was associated with a trend toward an increase in the risk of death (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.99-1.54) and significantly associated with increased risk of cardiac events (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.42).
CONCLUSIONS: Our population-based data indicate that after an ED visit for symptoms of unstable angina, the use of cardiac procedures was lower in women, but after taking into account baseline characteristics, men experienced worse outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10665705     DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.5.646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  43 in total

1.  Gender disparity and the appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Aarti Gupta; Sarah V Tsiaras; Shira I Dunsiger; Peter L Tilkemeier
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1993-2001.

Authors:  F L Lucas; Michael A DeLorenzo; Andrea E Siewers; David E Wennberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Women and men with unstable angina and/or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Andreja Sinkovic; Martin Marinsek; Franc Svensek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Sex differences and attitudes toward living donor kidney transplantation among urban black patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Avrum Gillespie; Heather Hammer; Stanislav Kolenikov; Athanasia Polychronopoulou; Vladimir Ouzienko; Zoran Obradovic; Megan A Urbanski; Teri Browne; Patricio Silva
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Effect of gender on treatment and outcomes in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Maryanne Hartzell; Rajeev Malhotra; Kibar Yared; Hannah R Rosenfield; Jennifer D Walker; Malissa J Wood
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Utility of Imaging in Risk Stratification of Chest Pain in Women.

Authors:  Emily S Lau; Amy Sarma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09

7.  Differences in admission rates and outcomes between men and women presenting to emergency departments with coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Padma Kaul; Wei-Ching Chang; Cynthia M Westerhout; Michelle M Graham; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Risk-taking attitudes and their association with process and outcomes of cardiac care: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kathryn M King; Colleen M Norris; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berger; Laine Elliott; Dianne Gallup; Matthew Roe; Christopher B Granger; Paul W Armstrong; R John Simes; Harvey D White; Frans Van de Werf; Eric J Topol; Judith S Hochman; L Kristin Newby; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Richard C Becker; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Fabian Sanchis-Gomar; Carme Perez-Quilis; Roman Leischik; Alejandro Lucia
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.