Literature DB >> 21514144

Intrinsically disordered proteins: regulation and disease.

M Madan Babu1, Robin van der Lee, Natalia Sanchez de Groot, Jörg Gsponer.   

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are enriched in signaling and regulatory functions because disordered segments permit interaction with several proteins and hence the re-use of the same protein in multiple pathways. Understanding IDP regulation is important because altered expression of IDPs is associated with many diseases. Recent studies show that IDPs are tightly regulated and that dosage-sensitive genes encode proteins with disordered segments. The tight regulation of IDPs may contribute to signaling fidelity by ensuring that IDPs are available in appropriate amounts and not present longer than needed. The altered availability of IDPs may result in sequestration of proteins through non-functional interactions involving disordered segments (i.e., molecular titration), thereby causing an imbalance in signaling pathways. We discuss the regulation of IDPs, address implications for signaling, disease and drug development, and outline directions for future research.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21514144     DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  210 in total

1.  Thermodynamic dissection of the intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain of human glucocorticoid receptor.

Authors:  Jing Li; Hesam N Motlagh; Carolyn Chakuroff; E Brad Thompson; Vincent J Hilser
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Agonism/antagonism switching in allosteric ensembles.

Authors:  Hesam N Motlagh; Vincent J Hilser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Allosteric modulators of steroid hormone receptors: structural dynamics and gene regulation.

Authors:  Raj Kumar; Iain J McEwan
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 4.  Interpreting functional effects of coding variants: challenges in proteome-scale prediction, annotation and assessment.

Authors:  Khader Shameer; Lokesh P Tripathi; Krishna R Kalari; Joel T Dudley; Ramanathan Sowdhamini
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Unraveling the complexities of DNA-dependent protein kinase autophosphorylation.

Authors:  Jessica A Neal; Seiji Sugiman-Marangos; Pamela VanderVere-Carozza; Mike Wagner; John Turchi; Susan P Lees-Miller; Murray S Junop; Katheryn Meek
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Regulation of the structurally dynamic N-terminal domain of progesterone receptor by protein-induced folding.

Authors:  Raj Kumar; Carmen M Moure; Shagufta H Khan; Celetta Callaway; Sandra L Grimm; Devrishi Goswami; Patrick R Griffin; Dean P Edwards
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Molecular Origins of Complex Heritability in Natural Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationships.

Authors:  Christopher M Jakobson; Daniel F Jarosz
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 10.304

8.  Arginine and disordered amyloid-β peptide structures: molecular level insights into the toxicity in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Orkid Coskuner; Olivia Wise-Scira
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 9.  Dynamic integration of splicing within gene regulatory pathways.

Authors:  Ulrich Braunschweig; Serge Gueroussov; Alex M Plocik; Brenton R Graveley; Benjamin J Blencowe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Enhanced Sampling of Intrinsic Structural Heterogeneity of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL.

Authors:  Xiaorong Liu; Zhiguang Jia; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.